![Queplix Virtual Data Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/fhbYV1XmkShiK4xADa6WDhJm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![Queplix Virtual Data Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/fhbYV1XmkShiK4xADa6WDhJm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Queplix Virtual Data Manager [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_40/fhbYV1XmkShiK4xADa6WDhJm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.
