Qlik Compose vs SSIS comparison

Qlik and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #49, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. Qlik holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Microsoft’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,319 Views
1,948 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SSIS

Read 76 SSIS reviews

16,841 Views
13,810 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SSIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SSIS and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration and transformation domain. Qlik Compose appears to have an edge due to its superior automation capabilities, particularly beneficial for complex data transformation tasks.

Features: SSIS offers seamless integration with SQL Server and Azure, robust data cleaning, and transformation capabilities, as well as a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop features. It excels in parallel processing for high data transfer efficiency. Qlik Compose provides advanced automation, real-time data integration, and the ability to create data marts without writing code, which differentiates it significantly. Its drag-and-drop interface and automatic data modeling are key benefits.

Room for Improvement: SSIS could enhance its initial setup process and expand its capabilities for complex transformation tasks. More robust real-time data processing and an improved user interface could be potential improvements. Qlik Compose could benefit from broader ETL functionalities, a more intuitive user interface for detailed custom configurations, and better integration options for non-SAP platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, ideal for organizations with limited technical resources. SSIS, while requiring more extensive setup, integrates smoothly within Microsoft environments leveraging its familiarity and support within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: SSIS typically presents lower initial setup costs for those already in the Microsoft ecosystem, making it a cost-effective choice with its affordable licensing. Qlik Compose might require a higher upfront investment, but its advanced automation can deliver a favorable ROI in complex environments. The efficiency in data transformation tasks makes Qlik Compose a valuable long-term investment despite the initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SSIS Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SSIS

Ranking in Data Integration

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SSIS is 3.6%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SSIS	3.6%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	95.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Chris Farris

Manager, Data Operations at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

User-friendly interface facilitates efficient data migration and reduces operational overhead

Its usability and ease of use are standout features. It is really easy to use - almost too easy at times. Users don't have to be experts to use their tool set and utilize the clicking mechanisms, drop down boxes, and other features to build a package and run it. The configuration is very easy and the system is very stable. I would rate it at a 10 as it is highly reliable; we have never had any problems with it. Very little maintenance is required on my side. While you need to keep the product up to date, the maintenance requirements are minimal. SSIS integrates with all Microsoft tools seamlessly. We have used it against Oracle, DB2 and SQL. It integrates and can move data around from any data platforms, making it very diverse in that standpoint. It is a very robust tool that can work with many data sources, and its main strength is that it is extremely easy to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"It's a stable solution."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"It is a scalable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It can scale."

More Qlik Compose pros

"Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services is one of the most effective ETL tools available in the market."

"It's already very user-friendly and has a good dashboard."

"The scalability of SSIS is good."

"This is one of the best analytic tools for a person or enterprise."

"The most valuable thing is that it is easy to connect with Microsoft tools. In Europe, particularly in France, a lot of companies use Excel, SQL Server, and other Microsoft tools, and it is easier to connect SSIS with Microsoft tools than other products."

"We can connect with multiple data sources easily using an external connector in SSIS."

"SSIS' best feature is SFTP connectivity."

"It is well designed and quite straightforward, with not much of a learning curve involved, and it is a well-documented solution."

More SSIS pros

Cons

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would also like to see full integration with our BI because then our full load of data will be available in our organization. They should incorporate an ATL process."

"This solution is stable, but the performance is not good."

"Another consideration is real-time processing needs. If this is a requirement then I would recommend against using this solution, unless the next version has a new set of features specifically for real-time processing."

"SSIS doesn't have a very good user interface, but if you can work with it, it'll provide you with almost all of the functionality."

"SSIS is not stable."

"Connectivity to databases other than Microsoft. This is the Achilles' heel."

"When I compare Talend and SSIS, Talend provides more features."

"We have faced some problems, mostly from a different provider with different language handling."

More SSIS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"People have to opt for a perpetual-based licensing model."

"The solution comes free of cost."

"Depending on the arrangement that a certain company has with Microsoft, it may supply the permanent license that is included in the SQL server license, or it may be a time-bound license if it is a partner license or other enterprise license."

"This solution is a free of charge addition to our SQL licence. However, the only way this tool can be utilized is as a feature of the SQL licence, which may make it unattractive to organizations who don't wish to purchase the wider-ranging licence."

"SSIS' licensing is a little high, but it gives good value for money."

"This solution is included with the MSSQL server package."

"It would be beneficial if the solution had a less costly cloud offering."

"The solution is available at a lesser price than that of Informatica."

More SSIS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user90069

BI Expert at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 20, 2014

Informatica PowerCenter vs. Microsoft SSIS - each technology has its advantages but also have similarities

Technology has made it easier for businesses to organize and manipulate data to get a clearer picture of what’s going on with their business. Notably, ETL tools have made managing huge amounts of data significantly easier and faster, boosting many organizations’ business intelligence operations…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	57

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Which is better - SSIS or Informatica PowerCenter?

SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free compo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SSIS?

Pricing is pretty reasonable, so I would rate it at a 5. However, it could be a bit cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SSIS?

SSIS could be integrated with more services, such as Power BI, to make the reporting structures more user-friendly. The initial setup for SSIS is somewhat complex in the beginning, but once you und...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SSIS

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SSIS

Compared 4% of the time

Skyvia vs SSIS

Compared 3% of the time

Fivetran vs SSIS

Compared 3% of the time

dbt vs SSIS

Compared 3% of the time

More SSIS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

June 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

SSIS

May 2026

Download SSIS product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

SQL Server Integration Services

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

SSIS is a versatile tool for data integration tasks like ETL processes, data migration, and real-time data processing. Users appreciate its ease of use, data transformation tools, scheduling capabilities, and extensive connectivity options. It enhances productivity and efficiency within organizations by streamlining data-related processes and improving data quality and consistency.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

1. Amazon.com 2. Bank of America 3. Capital One 4. Coca-Cola 5. Dell 6. E*TRADE 7. FedEx 8. Ford Motor Company 9. Google 10. Home Depot 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Foods 15. Lockheed Martin 16. McDonald's 17. Microsoft 18. Morgan Stanley 19. Nike 20. Oracle 21. PepsiCo 22. Procter & Gamble 23. Prudential Financial 24. RBC Capital Markets 25. SAP 26. Siemens 27. Sony 28. Toyota 29. UnitedHealth Group 30. Visa 31. Walmart 32. Wells Fargo

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

June 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SSIS and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SSIS report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.