Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Precisely and Quorum are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Precisely is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Quorum is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3. Precisely holds a 1.2% mindshare in DRS, compared to Quorum’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Precisely users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Read 2 Precisely Assure QuickEDD reviews

490 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quorum OnQ

Read 22 Quorum OnQ reviews

529 Views
80 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Quorum OnQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Precisely Assure QuickEDD and Quorum OnQ offer data backup and disaster recovery solutions. Quorum OnQ is preferred for its enhanced capabilities, though it comes at a higher price, making it slightly superior in functionality.

Features: Quorum OnQ provides instant recovery, automated testing, and comprehensive data protection. Precisely Assure QuickEDD focuses on efficient data synchronization, high availability, and real-time data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Precisely Assure QuickEDD offers streamlined deployment and responsive customer support, integrating effectively into systems. Quorum OnQ requires more intricate setup but is supported by detailed assistance from their team.

Pricing and ROI: Precisely Assure QuickEDD is known for its reasonable setup costs and favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises. Quorum OnQ, while more costly upfront, offers significant long-term ROI with its advanced features, which some businesses find essential despite the initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quorum OnQ

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (46th), Cloud Backup (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2325741

Director of Information Technology at a construction company with 1-10 employees

Trustworthy and provides good availability

Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over. It could be more of a knowledge transfer situation that didn't happen, but we didn't know if it was easy to use. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The implementation of QLED helped us with our recovery time objective and was a seamless transition. In order to utilize the product to its fullest potential, users should be knowledgeable of what it offers. They should also form a relationship with the person who is their representative. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Mohamed Iqbal

Presales Information Technology Consultant at JBA

A stable and economical solution that provides quick disaster recovery

The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery. We call it a single-click recovery. If any server goes down, crashes, or experiences downtime, we can bring up the DR (Disaster Recovery) server in just two minutes. We also have a "Single Pane of Glass," wherein we work with only a single window. You don't have to use multiple windows to perform basic tasks like failover or failback.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."

"Synchronous applications are valuable."

"When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"I have used the BMR (Bare Metal Restore) in several emergencies and it has absolutely saved my bacon."

"The biggest feature is being able to do a file recovery to the original server. That is extremely useful and has saved us a few times when we've had ransomware. In some of those cases, people's computers were locked down by viruses which spread to things they had access to, including server shares. But we were easily able to just restore to four hours prior, instead of a day or two or more ago."

"It does automated tests to the systems to make sure that you could spin them up if you needed to. And if something doesn't come back up in those tests, we get a notification saying the system didn't come back up."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The solution offers good documentation."

"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"There should be more interactive dashboards."

"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."

"I paid for subscription of Firewall. I paid for subscription of endpoint protection. Thet should introduce single subscription for all services."

"We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them."

"They need integration with other platforms."

"I don't love the scheduler, as I think that interface could use an overhaul."

"There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone."

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"The price is high and could be more competitive."

"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements. If you want to manage it, there is an extra cost."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

We used Precisely Assure QuickEDD for our backups.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

See all answers

What do you like most about Quorum OnQ?

It is a very scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 100% of the time

More Precisely Assure QuickEDD Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 50% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 15% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 10% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

May 2025

Download Precisely Assure QuickEDD product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

May 2025

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA

OnQ

Overview

Protecting critical IBM i applications from downtime and guarding against data loss with simple, scalable, full-featured high availability and disaster recovery products

Precisely

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Quorum

Sample Customers

Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ

June 2025

Free Report: Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Quorum OnQ report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.