Pentera vs Veracode comparison

Read 197 Veracode reviews

233 Views
155 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Pentera

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Veracode and Pentera compete in the cybersecurity field, offering a range of security testing solutions. Veracode has a slight edge due to its comprehensive integration capabilities and cloud-based flexibility.

Features: Veracode offers a comprehensive static and dynamic code analysis for multiple programming languages. It integrates SAST, DAST, and Greenlight to support secure DevOps cycles. Its cloud-based deployment allows for seamless code assessment and automatic security updates. Pentera focuses on continuous automated vulnerability assessment, emphasizing credential and vulnerability management. Its simulation of attack scenarios reveals real-time vulnerabilities, with real-world exploitability demonstrations.

Room for Improvement: Veracode needs to reduce false positives and simplify its interface for better usability. Enhancements in support for modern languages like Ruby could also be beneficial. Pentera requires improvements in dashboards for clearer reporting and scalability for smaller networks. It also needs transparency in handling compromised credentials and virtual patching capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode provides flexible deployment across private, public, and hybrid clouds, backed by highly rated technical support. Pentera primarily employs an on-premises or hybrid cloud approach, offering reliable support but facing issues with feature licensing clarity.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode's pricing is considered expensive and more suitable for larger enterprises. Its ROI is driven by comprehensive security features improving developer efficiency. Pentera is generally more affordable, appealing to companies requiring automated penetration testing, despite high costs for some features.

To learn more, read our detailed Pentera vs. Veracode Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Pentera vs. Veracode

April 2025

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pentera

Ranking in Penetration Testing Services

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (1st)

Veracode

Ranking in Penetration Testing Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

197

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Penetration Testing Services category, the mindshare of Pentera is 14.7%, up from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Penetration Testing Services

Featured Reviews

Richard Marlow

Vulnerability Testing Manager at Frasers Group

Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization

The tool is quite scalable. There's a one-to-one relationship between the engine and how many scans we can do. We can only do one scan with one engine. We had some issues around the password assessments because we added a lot of users. It took a long time. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. We have three users in our organization.

Read full review

AkashKhurana

Senior Software Engineer at Publicis Sapient

Easy to configure, stable, and good vulnerability detection

Veracode's ability to prevent vulnerable code from being deployed into production is crucial. Typically, if a dependency we use has security issues or concerns, Veracode suggests upgrading to a more secure version. For example, if we're using a PayPal dependency with version 1.3 and it has a security bug, Veracode suggests upgrading to version 1.4 which fixes the issue. We usually make our project compatible with version 1.4, but sometimes Veracode recommends removing the dependent code altogether and adding the updated dependency from another repository. Veracode provides suggestions for resolving security issues and we implement them in our code after resolving any conflicts. We run the Veracode scan again and if it fails, we do not deploy the code to production. This is critical as it ensures that security issues such as bugs and fixes are addressed. Veracode consistently assists us in identifying security issues in third-party dependencies, while also ensuring the maintenance of code quality. Preventing security bugs and threats in our code improves the overall code quality of our company, which is essential given the significant concerns surrounding security today. Veracode's policy reporting is helpful for ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations. Veracode's solution plays a major role in achieving compliance, including HIPAA compliance. Without Veracode scans, identifying security threats and third-party dependencies would be a tedious task for DevOps professionals. Veracode provides visibility into the status of our application during every phase of development, including continuous integration and continuous development CI/CD pipeline stages. This includes builds, package creation for deployment, and various enrollment stages such as develop, queue, stage, above, and production enrollment. Prior to each stage, a Veracode scan is run. This can be accessed through Jenkins or the CI/CD pipeline by clicking on the Veracode scan option, which provides a detailed report highlighting any security issues and concerns. Veracode performs statistical analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, and manual penetration tests throughout our software development life cycle. Veracode scans not only for third-party security issues but also for possible issues in our own code. This occurs in every phase of development, including the SDLC. For example, if we use an encryption algorithm with a private or public key that is easy to decode, Veracode will identify this as an error or warning in the report and suggest using multiple layers of encryption for the keys. The entire CI/CD process is part of DevOps. Therefore, the responsibility of configuring the Veracode tool usually falls on the DevOps professional. It is essential to integrate Veracode with the CI/CD pipeline within the project to ensure it is always incorporated. Whenever there is a priority or mandatory check required before deployment, Veracode should run beforehand. This integration is carried out by our DevSecOps team. Veracode's false positive rate is good, as it helps us identify possible security concerns in our code. In my opinion, it is advisable to run a Veracode scan on all codes. I have worked in the IT industry for five years, and I have observed that Veracode has been implemented in every project I have worked on. If a tool is improving our code quality and providing us with insights into potential security issues, it is always beneficial to use it. The false positive rate boosts our developers' confidence in Veracode when addressing vulnerabilities. Veracode also provides suggestions when there is a security issue with a dependency in version 1.7, prompting us to consider using version 1.8, which does not have security issues. This process involves the developers, and it leaves a positive impression on our managers and clients, demonstrating our commitment to security. We can show them that we were previously using version 1.7 but updated to version 1.8 after identifying the security issue with Veracode's help. Unfortunately, there is no centralized platform to check for network issues or problems with dependencies and versions. Veracode provides a centralized solution where we can scan our project and receive results. Veracode has helped our organization address flaws in our software and automation processes. Its positive impact has been reflected in our ROI, which increased when we started using Veracode. Without Veracode, we would be susceptible to security issues and potential hacking. However, after implementing Veracode scans, we have not encountered any such problems. It is critical for us to use Veracode because we capture sensitive data such as pharmacy information for real-time users, including patient prescriptions and refill schedules. This sensitive data could pose a significant problem if our code or software has security vulnerabilities. Fortunately, Veracode scans allow us to prevent such issues. Veracode has helped our developers save time by providing a solution that eliminates the need to manually check for dependencies or search the internet for information on which dependencies have issues. Instead, Veracode provides a detailed report that identifies the issues and recommends the appropriate version to use. Using Veracode ensures the quality of our code and also saves time for our developers. In my career of five years, Veracode has helped me resolve code issues eight times. Veracode has reduced our SecOps costs by identifying security vulnerabilities in our code. Without Veracode, if we were to go live with these issues, it could result in a breach of our encrypted data, potentially causing significant harm to our organization. This would require significant time and cost to resolve the issue and restore the data. Veracode has improved the quality of our code and reduced the risk of such incidents occurring, thereby minimizing their impact on our organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."

"The solution is SaaS-based. From a cloud perspective, it has Pentera Surface and Pentera Core. The Core is the on-prem deployed solution, while the Surface is the cloud-hosted solution that scans your public infrastructure. From the Surface perspective, the most valuable feature so far has been the attack surface mapping."

"Pentera has many authentic features."

"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."

"The platform's most valuable features are credential management and vulnerability management."

"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."

"Pentera has many authentic features."

"The tool showed us that our ransomware protection wasn’t working on some machines."

More Pentera pros

"Veracode creates a list of issues. You can go through them one by one and click through to a new window with all the information about the issue discovered."

"Static Scanning is the most valuable feature of Veracode."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable feature is the security and vulnerability parts of the solution. It shows medium to high vulnerabilities so we can find them, then upgrade our model before it is too late. It is useful because it automates security. Also, it makes things more efficient. So, there is no need for the security team to scan every time. The application team can update it whenever possible in development."

"The centralized view of different testing types helps reduce our risk exposure. The development teams have the freedom to choose their own libraries and languages. What happens is sometimes developers feel like a particular library is okay to use, then they will start using it, developing some functionality around it. However, as per our mandate, for every new repository that gets added and scanned, a report gets published. Based on that report, we decide if we can continue. In the past, we have found, by mistake, some developers have used copyleft licenses, which are a bit risky to use. We immediately replace these with more permissive, open-source licenses, so we are safe in the end."

"We use it to get our scan results and see where our software is vulnerable or not vulnerable."

"The Security Labs [is] where I have the developers training and constantly improving their security, and remembering their security techniques. That way, they are more proactive and make sure things are correct. They're faster because they're doing it in the first place."

"I like Veracode's ease of integration and onboarding. You can quickly and easily get started with a new project or application. That's one area where Veracode shines relative to other tools we've evaluated. Other tools need more work or an engineer to do the setup. With Veracode, you can do the onboarding in a few steps quickly."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."

"One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring."

"One of the big issues we have is that the tool has an additional license for compromised credentials. Suppose compromised credentials for any of your domains appear in leaks, dumps, or are being sold. In that case, they try to aggregate that data and highlight that, for example, ten users appeared in recent dumps as compromised credentials. However, they don't provide much information about where those compromises came from or their source information, probably to protect their sources."

"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."

"The price could be improved."

"The licensing and IP management need improvement. When the IP is imported into a system, we cannot withdraw or revoke the license."

"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."

"The licensing and IP management need improvement."

More Pentera cons

"Veracode should include the feature to run multiple scales at a time."

"The interface is basic and has room for improvement."

"If Veracode was more diversified, as far as the number of platforms and the number of applications it could do in our favor, we would be using it even more. But there are a number of platforms it doesn't support. For example, I know they support C+, .NET, and Java, but there are certain platforms they don't support and that was disappointing."

"It's problematic if you want to integrate it with your pipelines because the documentation is not so well written and it's full of typos. It is not presented in a structured way. It does not say, "If you want to achieve this particular thing, you have to do steps 1, 2, and 3." Instead, it contains bits of information in different parts, and you have to read everything and then understand the big picture."

"The language version support could be improved."

"The feature that allows me to read which mitigation answer was submitted, and to approve it, requires me to use do so in different screens. That makes it a little bit more complicated because I have to read and then I have to go back and make sure it falls under the same number ID number. That part is a little bit complicated from my perspective, because that's what I use the most."

"Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them."

"The reports on offer are too verbose."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is relatively cheap."

"We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."

"It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."

"The product's cost is reasonable. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"It has good, fair licensing. If the price could depend on the scope of its scanning or the languages supported, then that would be better."

"I don't have firsthand knowledge of Veracode pricing, but based on client feedback, it seems to be expensive with additional fees for certain features."

"It's very expensive, especially when you are a very small organization. If you're using Veracode at an individual level, for example, you're a developer or you run agents, the pricing might not affect you, but if you're using it at a company level to troubleshoot security issues, the pricing is not quite favorable. It may affect ROI."

"The pricing is pretty high."

"No issues, the pricing seems reasonable."

"Pricing seems fair for what is offered, and licensing has been no problem. All developers are able to get the access they need."

"The price of Veracode Static Analysis is on the higher side."

"Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pentera?

What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.

What needs improvement with Pentera?

The licensing and IP management need improvement. When the IP is imported into a system, we cannot withdraw or revoke the license.

What is your primary use case for Pentera?

I am using the OpenIntra solution for pentesting and managing candidates in my environment. I also use this solution for house customers.

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What do you like most about Veracode?

The SAST and DAST modules are great.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?

The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.

Picus Security vs Pentera

Comparisons

Cymulate vs Pentera

Compared 22% of the time

Compared 13% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Pentera

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Pentera

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Pentera

Compared 8% of the time

More Pentera Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode

Compared 20% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

March 2025

Download Pentera product report

Download Veracode product report

April 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to evaluate its security readiness, to know its real security risk at any given moment. Test all cybersecurity layers across the attack surface – inside and out – by safely emulating attacks & prioritize patching with a risk-based remediation roadmap.

Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io

Pentera

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.