"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The solution has very helpful technical support."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"The initial setup takes time."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.
Pega BPM is ranked 5th in Rapid Application Development Software with 27 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while QuickBase is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Excellent machine learning, automation intelligence, DevOps for larger organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "A low-code platform for creating apps quickly and connecting work activities, but it needs a modern UI and better connectivity with other platforms". Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda Platform, Appian, ServiceNow, Microsoft PowerApps and IBM BPM, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, ServiceNow, OutSystems, Appian and Zoho Creator.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.