Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pandora FMS vs Sysgem Logfile Concentrator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Pandora FMS
Ranking in Log Management
42nd
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (46th), Server Monitoring (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (39th), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)
Sysgem Logfile Concentrator
Ranking in Log Management
91st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Gabriel Glusgold - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
Personalized metrics; simplicity of data
My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…
Use Sysgem Logfile Concentrator?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."
"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."
"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."
"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."
"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."
"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."
"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."
"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Educational Organization
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pandora FMS?
Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data.
What needs improvement with Pandora FMS?
I would like for the solution to be faster and have a better tolerance between parallel servers for Pandora and Pest Control. In the next release, I'd like to see, when it comes to monitoring, the ...
What is your primary use case for Pandora FMS?
My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes
1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Apple 8. ATT 9. Autodesk 10. Bank of America 11. Barclays 12. Boeing 13. Cisco 14. Coca Cola 15. Comcast 16. Dell 17. Disney 18. ETRADE 19. ExxonMobil 20. FedEx 21. Ford 22. Google 23. HP 24. IBM 25. Intel 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Kraft Heinz 28. Lockheed Martin 29. McDonalds 30. Merck 31. Microsoft 32. Morgan Stanley
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2024.
812,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.