We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution with good support."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It is a scalable product."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"We use Trend Micro mainly to monitor user activities, such as tracking the websites they visit and purchase items. Additionally, we focus on identifying and addressing antivirus threats. We used to explore a feature related to proxy but decided against it as an enterprise solution wasn't readily available for us. Our primary use of Trend Micro revolves around end-user security. Integration with Active Directory has proven beneficial, allowing us to easily push updates or changes directly from the console."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"We find the initial setup to be very easy."
"The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
"Needs a remote login option."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Cyberhaven and Symantec Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian and Trellix DLP. See our Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
