Palantir Gotham vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palantir Gotham and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

More Palantir Gotham Pros →

"Areas for improvement would be the cloud fitness of the product and the ease of migrating to newer versions.""It is a seamless and sophisticated tool.""The high availability, tolerance, and load balancing features are top-notch. Its scalability features are also pretty cool.""The most valuable features are the stability and the time to market.""The initial setup of TIBCO BusinessWorks was straightforward since we have used the solution in our organization for a long time.""Good performance and reliability.""The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance.""Customer support is very efficient."

More TIBCO BusinessWorks Pros →

Cons
"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

More Palantir Gotham Cons →

"There are not many plugins available to integrate the databases. We have to write it in Java and integrate it. The developers should have more knowledge. These are the three main aspects that they could improve.""The cost of the solution has room for improvement.""There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations.""There is room for improvement on the learning side.""Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved.""I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud.""The initial setup is not easy.""This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

More TIBCO BusinessWorks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."
  • "It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."
  • "Its price policy has changed quite a lot in the last two years. It was extremely expensive previously. Nowadays, you can buy a license for BusinessWorks for €2000. Looking at what you get in return in terms of support, TIBCO community, and stability, it is fairly reasonable. It is not too expensive."
  • "I think BusinessWorks is more expensive compared to other products. We have the ELA, so at least we have some sort of bargain or discount with that. But for a start-up, it's very expensive compared to other ESBs."
  • "Licensing scheme is too rigid"
  • "I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."
  • "The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."
  • "I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."
  • More TIBCO BusinessWorks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule… more »
    Top Answer:The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us.
    Top Answer:The product is not cheap. However, the pricing is reasonable.
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    1,998
    Comparisons
    1,381
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    279
    Rating
    8.0
    17th
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,305
    Comparisons
    1,277
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    455
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Palantir Gotham platform comprises a suite of capabilities for integrating many different data sources for secure, collaborative analysis. The platform serves as an enterprise knowledge base, containing the full record of an organization's collective analysis.

    TIBCO BusinessWorks allows to connect applications, whether on-premises or in the cloud, providing proven reliability and scalability, out-of-the-box. With a drag-and-drop graphical development environment, TIBCO BusinessWorks eliminates the pain and cost of point-to-point application integration, connecting and unifying business processes across applications, data sources, and APIs, with access to real-time data across all your platforms.
    Sample Customers
    Team Rubicon, CGI
    Euler Hermes, QSuper, Scandinavian Airlines
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Transportation Company16%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Palantir Gotham is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 17th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. Palantir Gotham is rated 8.0, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palantir Gotham writes "A seamless all-in-one solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". Palantir Gotham is most compared with Palantir Foundry, Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler, Azure Data Factory, SAS Data Management and FME, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Confluent and Informatica PowerCenter.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.