Palantir Gotham vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

"The tool's most valuable feature is BusinessConnect. It's an older product but still quite useful, especially for transferring files from one location to another."

"We are using only plugins for the database and SAP."

"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."

"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with."

"We use the solution to develop applications."

"It is very stable. It is a market leader, and it has connectors to many of the legacy systems. It also has enterprise cloud connectors."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."

"The high availability, tolerance, and load balancing features are top-notch. Its scalability features are also pretty cool."

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."

"Cloud fitness is lacking"

"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

"The container-based image is too large and this makes auto-scaling difficult."

"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."

"The creation of XSDs should be much simpler. They should ensure that what was working in the previous version must also work in the new version of BW six."

"There is room for improvement on the learning side."

"Improve Business Studio's stability to further minimize development time."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"Licensing scheme is too rigid"

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."

"The product is not cheap."

"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."