Palantir Gotham vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

"We are using only plugins for the database and SAP."

"I like TIBCO BusinessWorks because it has a user-friendly GUI for developing solutions."

"It is user friendly, it's not complex."

"It is very valuable for my work, helping me communicate with other branches, parse data, and change data formats to respond to the front channels with the correct format."

"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."

"The initial setup of TIBCO BusinessWorks was straightforward since we have used the solution in our organization for a long time."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten…On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the initial setup a nine."

"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"The creation of XSDs should be much simpler. They should ensure that what was working in the previous version must also work in the new version of BW six."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks could be improved with cloud support."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks needs to improve its digital IDs and data processing capabilities. It will benefit small and medium businesses."

"The creation of XSDs should be much simpler."

"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."

"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."

"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."

"The product is not cheap."

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."

"The payments made for service are the only addition to the standard licensing fees that we pay for the solution."

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."