Palantir Gotham vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

"This solution is seamless; from one platform, we can do just about anything."

"I like TIBCO BusinessWorks because it has a user-friendly GUI for developing solutions."

"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with, and BusinessWorks is robust, flexible, and scalable."

"BusinessWorks reduces development time, helping developers to focus on business logic."

"We are using only plugins for the database and SAP."

"The most important thing is that it is easy for developers to work with."

"It is a market leader, and it has connectors to many of the legacy systems, and it also has enterprise cloud connectors."

"One of the most valuable features is data transformation; we have some legacy systems which are in old technology, like SOAP, whereas the new ones are in REST, so we use BusinessWorks to transform data from one format to another, from SOAP to REST."

"It is user friendly, it's not complex."

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"I think TIBCO needs to do a lot in terms of making it a first-class cloud solution."

"Pricing is not one of its strengths. Using Tibco BusinessWorks implies adopting a non-trivial set of products (Hawk, Rendez-vous, EMS in most cases), and previous cost models enabled scalability on installation and deployment."

"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."

"The solution’s customer support should be improved."

"Overall, TIBCO BusinessWorks has not evolved properly over time, and right now, if you compare it to other solutions that have evolved drastically, TIBCO BusinessWorks will pale in comparison; it's an outdated product."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"There is room for improvement on the learning side."

"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"Licensing scheme is too rigid"

"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"The license is expensive, and I would rate it one out of ten."

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."