Palantir Gotham vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

"I work in operations, so I value BusinessWorks' performance the most."

"XML to JSON transformations, out-of-the-box, helps to build REST services."

"The most valuable feature is the low-code platform."

"The high availability, tolerance, and load balancing features are top-notch. Its scalability features are also pretty cool."

"I like TIBCO BusinessWorks because it has a user-friendly GUI for developing solutions."

"The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance."

"The most valuable part of the solution is the ease-of-use and ease of deployment."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

"The cost has room for improvement."

"I'd like to see a new cloud approach in the next release. They need to work on integrations, stability and management issues on their cloud platform."

"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."

"There are not many plugins available to integrate the databases. We have to write it in Java and integrate it. The developers should have more knowledge. These are the three main aspects that they could improve."

"Technical support is average. It's not the best."

"Performance and latency could be enhanced. Additionally, having signaling stack support would be beneficial."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost depends on the components required."

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"The payments made for service are the only addition to the standard licensing fees that we pay for the solution."