FME vs Palantir Gotham comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Safe Software Logo
3,029 views|2,359 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Palantir Logo
1,922 views|1,313 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FME and Palantir Gotham based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.""The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process.""It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources.""All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable.""It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

More FME Pros →

"This solution is seamless. From one platform, we can do just about anything."

More Palantir Gotham Pros →

Cons
"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions.""The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point.""FME's price needs improvement for the African market.""To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues.""Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

More FME Cons →

"I think there should be less coding involved. Currently, using it involves a tremendous amount of coding."

More Palantir Gotham Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."
  • "The product's price is reasonable."
  • "FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."
  • More FME Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
    Top Answer:The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's… more »
    Top Answer:The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    25th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    3,029
    Comparisons
    2,359
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    605
    Rating
    8.3
    33rd
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    1,922
    Comparisons
    1,313
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    279
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

    The Palantir Gotham platform comprises a suite of capabilities for integrating many different data sources for secure, collaborative analysis. The platform serves as an enterprise knowledge base, containing the full record of an organization's collective analysis.

    Sample Customers
    Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System
    Team Rubicon, CGI
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government29%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FME is ranked 25th in Data Integration with 5 reviews while Palantir Gotham is ranked 33rd in Data Integration with 1 review. FME is rated 8.6, while Palantir Gotham is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palantir Gotham writes "A seamless all-in-one solution ". FME is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Alteryx Designer, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Palantir Gotham is most compared with Palantir Foundry, Stone Bond Enterprise Enabler, Azure Data Factory and SAS Data Management.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.