We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Salesforce based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Low-Code Development Platforms."In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"The solution helps to build mobile and web applications on SOAP and REST. You can integrate it with backend systems by submitting a code."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"OutSystems is a low-code solution. Most features are like drag-and-drop, so it's pretty easy to work. Thus it helps the organization by saving time for developers."
"OutSystems is easy to use."
"The solution's analytics reporting features are quite good."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"We can manage opportunities easily."
"The tool's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."
"Salesforce provides opportunity management, including stage management. It offers basic functions to categorize opportunities as lead, qualified, or committed. I can share these opportunities with my peers and managers."
"We use the solution to map the sales pipeline and see how it is going and where it is pending."
"As a manager, the dashboard is valuable for me."
"This automation has been incredibly beneficial, reducing our workload and time spent."
"The new version could be improved."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"The integration Studio could be improved. It needs a tool in which we could develop C# code and then integrate into OutSystems. The application could have a better UI."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"I would say the areas of concern in the product that require improvement revolve around its integration capabilities with third-party systems."
"My customers wanted to see more analysis, like integration with another system or a third-party system."
"The platform flow for the product could be better. It is cluttered with a lot of components."
"The tool needs to improve its UI."
"There have been occasional issues with multiple tickets being generated for the same incident."
"Salesforce gives you a lot of messages, and you don't know what the messages mean."
"The solution could be more intuitive with regard to customization and navigation."
"The product needs to improve integration."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews while Salesforce is ranked 4th in Customer Experience Management with 32 reviews. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Salesforce is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce writes "Offers various aspects like process improvement, control, performance evaluation and more". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX), whereas Salesforce is most compared with .
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
