Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Procurement Cloud vs Procurify vs SAP Ariba Procurement comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Procurement Software category, the mindshare of Oracle Procurement Cloud is 11.3%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Procurify is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Ariba Procurement is 25.7%, up from 25.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Procurement Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Ariba Procurement25.7%
Oracle Procurement Cloud11.3%
Procurify0.8%
Other62.2%
Procurement Software
 

Featured Reviews

KM
Highly customizable, scalable and seamlessly integrates
Off late, most of my customers, where I see a trend, are long-standing heavily customized major customers on ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) on EBS who want to convert themselves to the cloud, and they expect us to provide the same level of customizations that EBS supports them in the cloud. So that's the challenge where we are currently. We have a few strategic advisory accounts like that, and we are evaluating those customizations to see how we can plug them as part of the solution offering so that the customer retains their current custom behavior and they don't have to deal with too many changes with their users. And that's the biggest change that we are working on. And there is a bundle of such initiatives that we do internally. Custom roles are one such thing. There are several areas of improvement. In the procurement cloud, we have today the landed cost management, where there's a lot of flexibility, which has been given on the cloud side in terms of costing. So the license and pricing have become a little complex area. And then auto management has completely changed in the cloud, the way the pricing strategy has been. It's been more complex and more flexible in the cloud. So that's the second area where we see challenges. These two, plus yes, now with self-service procurement, the dynamics have changed in global procurement, where the corporate will do the billing and invoicing, and we can do it from any big use, placing purchase orders and all that, the consolidation and the dynamics of testing. So these are some of the things which have greater flexibility, but at the same time, there is complexity in terms of implementation. We try to implement everything within the same window of the same customer window of six months. In future releases, I would like to see the idea of automating the period close process, which would be beneficial for sustenance after go-live. It is more like sustenance, both go live. If there is a mechanism where the period close can be automated, or it can be if the product can come up with a dashboard specifically for that, which ties with the sequence of the sub-ledgers, what are the conflicts to close the sub-ledger areas to facilitate and close the ledger area? Which consumer buying? That's one initiative or one idea that I'm thinking about. There are quite a few like that, which are more from the sustenance standpoint, more than the implementation standpoint.
Use Procurify?
Share your opinion
Marcel  Wagner - PeerSpot reviewer
The guided buying features are appreciated, but the solution is unstable and difficult to scale
My clients use the solution for indirect procurement. The solution is deployed in the SAP cloud environment I like the guided buying features. The creation tool is for HANA, and I would like the solution to be more automatic. I've worked with SAP Ariba Procurement for the past ten years. We…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Procurement Software solutions are best for your needs.
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SAP Ariba Procurement?
Salesforce is expensive, with a subscription-based model. This poses challenges for small and medium enterprises due ...
What is your primary use case for SAP Ariba Procurement?
The primary use case of Salesforce is in the B2B space. I use it to capture, analyze, summarize, and record customer ...
 

Also Known As

Procurement Cloud
No data available
Ariba Procurement
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BUYDEEM, Capgemini, Asahi Refining
ASCO USA, Legacy Traditional School, Stablegold Hospitality, LKQ Corporation, Sterling Bank Services, Intrinsic Schools, AltSchool
Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)