We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The solution is scalable."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
