Oracle Hyperion vs SAP Business Planning and Consolidation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
3,345 views|2,180 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
336 views|251 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Hyperion and SAP Business Planning and Consolidation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Hyperion Planning or SAP BPC?
Answer: The only reason to consider BPC at this point is if you are locked into an SAP architecture. SAP is re-architecting BPC to utilize their HANA memory-resident database, which is basically a heart-lung transplant - long, costly and complex. BPC is also known as one of the most costly CPM implementations in the market, which is not likely to get better as SAP rejiggers it for HANA. Hyperion Planning is a long-time leader in on-premise CPM, and Oracle is 2-3 years ahead of SAP in moving to the Cloud. Oracle's PBCS product is basically Hyperion Planning with an HTML5 user interface, and is substantially more mature than BPC at this point. Gartner judged it to be one of 4 apps in it's Strategic CPM Magic Quadrant this past June. (SAP was not even listed by Gartner.) It's also priced very aggressively, like all of the new Oracle Cloud Service apps - $14-30K per year, list. So if there are strong reasons for you to go with either SAP or Oracle, and you're OK with a cloud solution, then Oracle PBCS would be the better choice at this point. If you're not locked into these two vendors, as the responder above mentioned, there are some other cloud CPM vendors like Host Analytics or Adaptive insights in the Gartner MQ that have lower cost of ownership than on-premise solutions.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."
  • "Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."
  • "To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."
  • "We pay for licensing yearly."
  • "Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."
  • "The licenses cost approximately $1,000."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."
  • More Oracle Hyperion Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Anonymous User
    it_user722142 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user722142 (Chairman Of The Executive Board with 1-10 employees)
    Vendor

    I have hands-on experience using both products. However, I wish there were cloud-based tools available during that time. I am currently working with a client where we completed an assessment of four major players in the CPM space. Your company may want to consider a similar approach prior to making this capital expenditure. The results may surprise you. If you are a growing company, you may want to consider products that have the flexibility to change as your company's needs will change.

    it_user647802 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user647802 (SAP Sales Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees)
    MSP

    Hi

    It depends on a few factors:

    1. Is their backend ERP SAP? If so then SAP BPC has a “chance”. If not, go Hyperion as it is the market leader and accountants are more familiar with the tool.

    2. If they do have SAP, then

    a. What version of SAP? If they are on or are intending to go S/4 HANA then I would go BPC as it is integrated and is much improved on previous versions.

    b. If they are not intending on going to S/4 now but intend on staying on SAP, then in most likelihood they will be going S/4 in the next 2 years. If they can wait… then I would wait to avoid the costs of a “double” implementation.

    it_user741864 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user741864 (Director Of Business Development with 11-50 employees)
    Vendor

    I like Hyperion because of the pre-set modules. CFOs seem to like it.

    it_user524019 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user524019 (Works)
    Vendor

    I would agree with Tanbir. It really depends on the need of the client.

    it_user199395 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user199395 (Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees)
    Vendor

    A choice between two vendors rarely comes down to the tool (software) itself. This is usually because they both have strong selling points that got you to thus point.
    I have not used thesee two personally but offer you thus advise.
    1. If you have the time request a demo based in what you leadership team would need to see. Never accept the canned demo which shows the app in the best possible light. Use your data if possible.
    2. An application is only as good as its usefulness to its users. I have bought great software and no one really used it. So again whatever the choice ensure that you get the buy-in from your user community.
    3. Let the vendor explain how they can fill the gap between your expectations and the app capabilities (always is something ).
    4. Ensure that you will be able to access the needed support post implementation. This will allow for the continued success of the app use.

    Lastly trust your gut and spend time doing the research and asking the questions.
    Noone else does it like you and your team is depending on you to paint a way forward.

    Remember it's just a tool. Right now you got it down to 2. So review the above and take your shot.

    Good luck, let me know how it works out.

    Regards,
    Andrew

    it_user490053 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user490053 (EPM & Analytics Consultant at a consultancy)
    Consultant

    Depends. In terms of functionality, they both do similar things. I'm sure a lot of users can give you a long list of pros and cons of both, but the choice often comes down to what works well in your environment. The best way to find out is by getting your hands on it and try a proof of concept. I would start by defining exactly what you will be using it for, you may find that lighter weight cloud CPM solutions may be a better fit and with a faster deployement.

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting.
    Top Answer:Integrating Oracle Hyperion, a multidimensional database, with relational databases poses challenges due to the differing database structures.
    Top Answer:We use the solution for partition planning, HCM, and financial reporting.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,345
    Comparisons
    2,180
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    630
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    336
    Comparisons
    251
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hyperion
    SAP BPC
    Learn More
    Overview
    Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

    The SAP Business Planning and Consolidation (SAP BPC) application delivers planning, budgeting, forecasting, and financial consolidation capabilities, so you can easily adjust plans and forecasts, speed up budget and closing cycles, and ensure compliance with financial reporting standards.

    Sample Customers
    ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.
    Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Retailer15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Performance Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 49 reviews while SAP Business Planning and Consolidation is ranked 5th in Financial Performance and Strategy Management. Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0, while SAP Business Planning and Consolidation is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A world-class solution that provides a lot of functionality out of the box and also allows you to customize it to meet your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business Planning and Consolidation writes "​​It's a robust solution with no issues​. In my view, it is necessary to introduce another way to create reports apart from MS Excel". Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Tableau, Anaplan, IBM Cognos, Oracle HFM and Infor dEPM, whereas SAP Business Planning and Consolidation is most compared with CCH Tagetik, Longview Analytics, LucaNet, Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud and Workiva Wdesk.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.