Oracle GoldenGate vs VMware Tanzu Data Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GoldenGate
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (6th)
VMware Tanzu Data Services
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (6th), Data Warehouse (5th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle GoldenGate is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Services is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Database Development and Management
3.6%
Data Warehouse
8.1%
 

Featured Reviews

GS
Jan 12, 2024
A robust and reliable data replication and integration providing real-time, heterogeneous data movement that significantly streamlines development and ensures cost-effectiveness
Having a graphical interface would greatly enhance the tool. A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial. While the current interface is functional, incorporating a more visually intuitive design, perhaps inspired by widely used interfaces, would make it even more straightforward. Looking ahead to future releases, there are specific features I'd appreciate having. One such feature is the incorporation of pipelines, similar to those in Java, for seamless integration. Additionally, configuring for the Amazon Cloud is currently not straightforward; it often requires adding Python code to customize integrations. I would like to see an enhancement in this aspect, making the configuration process more straightforward and less reliant on intricate coding, particularly during meetings or collaborative sessions.
VB
Mar 9, 2023
Great queues and publishing capabilities with good reliability
We use the solution for event-driven programming. We have multiple queues and channels to provide scenarios for publishing into containers. You have to communicate the microservices, and consumers consume the services.  We were using the solution to setting the tenant settings into the service.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"The solution's existing SaaS platform for data integration gives us an edge."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"Many of the features of Oracle GoldenGate are valuable. We use Oracle databases and this tool is from Oracle, making it have superior compatibility."
"The most valuable feature is data replication capability."
"I like that the product transforms data and provides real-time applications."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"It works very well with large database queries."
"The loading speed is very good."
"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."
 

Cons

"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"Oracle GoldenGate's installation is not user-friendly, we had to read a lot of documentation for the setup and configuration."
"Regarding improvements, the focus should be on addressing data quality issues and minimizing delays, particularly in Oracle databases. The technical support should be improved as well. Additionally, in terms of features, it would be great if the solution could support APIs. The support is not friendly. They don’t respond on time."
"Additional performance metrics should be added and visible in a dashboard, displayed in a detailed manner."
"VMware Tanzu Greenplum needs improvement in the memory area and improved methods for quick access to the disc. So, one of the quick goals of Greenplum must work on enhancing access to the disc by adding hints in the database."
"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"they need to interact more with customers. They need to explain the features, especially when there are new releases of Greenplum. I know just from information I've found that it has other features, it can be used to for analytics, for integration with Big Data, Hadoop. They need to focus on this part with the customer."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The return on investment would make it a worthwhile deal."
"Pricing is based on anual licensing with additional costs for support packages."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Oracle GoldenGate, which is very expensive."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing."
"The one feature that I think Oracle could perhaps consider is, at the moment, the Veridata option is an extra cost. Golden Gate is an expensive product. You pay a lot for the best. But not including the Veridata license to prove that everything is working correctly... The big improvement for me would be to have that license built in. That would take it to the next level. That would make it a much better product. You may want to look at buying term licenses if you've just got a single migration to do. In that situation, you might want a term license for perhaps a year to save a lot of money, rather than buying a perpetual license."
"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective for the end users."
"Its price can be better. It is a bit crazy, and its licensing is very difficult to understand. I would rate it one out of five in terms of pricing. There don't seem to be any additional costs."
"We have purchased corporate licensing to use Oracle GoldenGate."
"The pricing is okay."
"It is an open-source product."
"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
"This is an open source solution."
"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle GoldenGate?
The product is reliable for data integrity.
What needs improvement with Oracle GoldenGate?
The documentation could be improved. The product is not easy to use. The knowledge required for the product is high. There are open-source products in the market that are easier to use than Oracle ...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

GoldenGate
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Japan Exchange Group, Daewoo E&C, Herbalife, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Canon, Turk Telekom
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.