Opsview vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

ITRS and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0, while PICO is ranked #68. ITRS holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

4,172 Views
2,920 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

2,653 Views
2,414 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opsview

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Opsview and Pico Corvil Analytics are competitive products in the network monitoring and data analytics space. Pico Corvil Analytics seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced analytical features, appealing to customers needing superior performance.

Features: Opsview provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities and is easy to integrate with various platforms, ideal for complex IT environments. It offers flexible pricing and has strong support services. On the other hand, Pico Corvil Analytics offers real-time data analysis and high-performance packet monitoring, providing detailed insights into network activities with robust analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could improve in the depth of its analytics features and real-time monitoring capabilities. Additionally, enhancing its performance monitoring could increase its appeal. Pico Corvil Analytics could focus on simplifying its deployment process and optimizing its pricing for budget-conscious clients. Streamlining its extensive documentation could also improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview is known for straightforward deployment and excellent support, providing responsive and personalized assistance. Pico Corvil Analytics requires a more complex setup but compensates with extensive documentation and skilled support for handling complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview is characterized by flexible pricing with a lower entry cost, appealing to a wide range of budgets, leading to quicker ROI. Pico Corvil Analytics, though higher in cost, is favored for its long-term ROI due to its powerful analytics capabilities, making it a valuable investment for enterprise-level demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (20th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (36th), Cloud Monitoring Software (25th)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

68th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.6%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Very easy-to-use interface, especially starting from v5 onwards Advanced tweaking possibilities Netflow"

"Afterwards, they were impressed by how easy monitoring could be, and they no longer had to edit large text files in order to configure hosts and service checks."

"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider, and we also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."

"Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does."

"The dashboards are the real value add for this product in my opinion and enhance customer experience if done properly."

"What was very compelling about OpsView was that we could dial out the noise and have meaningful and actionable alerts."

"With the monitoring capabilities, I can tell when things happen and be proactive about them instead of constantly putting out fires."

"I like its scalability thanks to slaves, as you can add as many as you want, which also allows you to reach and monitor devices running on the network that are not accessible by the master."

More Opsview pros

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"Corvil is really useful, if you want to produce statistics for your application across different platforms then I would definitely recommend it."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"My advice is "Go for it." It's an amazing product."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"In the sense that it helps us identify performance issues, it does give us a performance advantage over competitors."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"It can be a little bit flaky with the agent on VMware."

"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."

"We have had some stability issues, but that is largely because we're using an unsupported database."

"I wish they'd update the iOS app, which, I think, is the same version I used back in 2012 or so."

"Often the webpage becomes inaccessible and you need to refresh the page."

"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."

"Some aspects of the GUI functionality need improvement."

"The graphing feature needs work, although it has been rewritten in release 5.0 and we have yet to deploy it."

More Opsview cons

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting... The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky and I find that, whereas on the GUI you can pull out all the metrics you want and it's very flexible and nice and easy to customize, the reporting is not very intuitive."

"It is perceived as an expensive option, even in the financial services sector."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

"I have seen errors where the CNE and the CMC haven't synced because of something missing in the CMC, which was there in the CNE. We would get some type of error, but it doesn't actually say what exactly was missing in the CNE."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"Sometimes, when you are saving any configuration and making changes, there are times something is missing. An error comes up, or sometimes there is no error, and the errors are not very straightforward as to the issue."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

cPacket cClear vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

April 2026

Download Opsview product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2026

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

Corvil

Overview

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Pico Corvil Analytics offers advanced capabilities in latency measurement, data analysis, and real-time packet decoding. Its intuitive dashboards and comprehensive analytics support latency management and customizable metrics, enhancing performance monitoring and infrastructure optimization.

Designed to assist in latency monitoring and benchmarking, Pico Corvil Analytics is essential for tracking server and exchange latency, client connectivity, electronic trading environments, and order flows. It provides features like real-time analytics, custom dashboards, and anomaly detection, aiding in transaction scrutiny and market activity predictions. Users note the depth of analytics features, although there is a desire for iHub functionality within the app, simpler configurations, and more intuitive performance analytics and reporting.

What are the core features of Pico Corvil Analytics?

Latency Measurement: Precision tracking for server and exchange latency.
Data Analysis: Granular insights for enhanced trading efficiency.
Real-Time Packet Decoding: Immediate packet analysis for troubleshooting.
Visualization: Advanced dashboards enhancing data communication.
Intelligent Alerts: Proactive performance monitoring and collaborations.

What benefits can users expect from Pico Corvil Analytics?

Enhanced Trading Efficiency: Drives strategic upgrades and operational improvements.
Nuanced Network Analysis: Empowers detailed troubleshooting and network management.
Performance Monitoring: Aids infrastructure optimization through informed decisions.

Pico Corvil Analytics is widely implemented in industries requiring high-performance trading infrastructures, such as financial services and electronic trading environments. It supports users in predicting market activities and ensuring reliable, efficient trade execution. Custom dashboards and real-time analysis provide a competitive edge in these high-stakes arenas.

PICO

Sample Customers

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2026

Free Report: Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Opsview vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.