OpenESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

OpenESB and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. OpenESB is ranked #14, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenESB holds a 1.5% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenESB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

OpenESB

Read 4 OpenESB reviews

433 Views
115 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 19 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,052 Views
568 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and OpenESB compete in the integration solutions domain. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator holds the upper hand with its advanced features and deployment support, while OpenESB offers a cost-effective solution due to its open-source nature.

Features: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator provides robust integration with multiple cloud-native instances, managed API support, and extensive capability for seamless integrations. OpenESB is valued for its simplicity, strong enterprise message processing, and significant integration functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers comprehensive deployment flexibility across various environments, coupled with strong customer support. OpenESB provides straightforward deployment processes but has lower customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator involves a higher initial cost, justified by its extensive features and long-term benefits. OpenESB, being open-source, involves lower setup costs, making it attractive to budget-conscious users seeking reasonable return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of OpenESB is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 5.2%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

PaulPerez

Integration Architect at Pymma consulting

Easily define choreography and orchestration with this process-oriented solution

We provide contracted services for our customers that include coordinating with providers and implementing the solution. A current project includes using the solution to deploy 200 microservices. The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration. This feature…

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."

"The core is very stable."

"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."

"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"The installation process is easy."

"The solution's customer service is good."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"The stability is excellent."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"The documentation needs to be better."

"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."

"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."

"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are two versions. The first is the community version, which is free and contains the last part of the feature, but if you want to get the Enterprise version, you'll have to pay €60,000 which covers support and two instances on production."

"The Community Edition is a full product you can use in production, it does not have limitations like other alternatives."

"The cost for the prediction instrument is high because it is charged per instances based on prediction, but the rest of the solution is free."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Hospitality Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs OpenESB

Compared 41% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs OpenESB

Compared 27% of the time

More OpenESB Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 4% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB

May 2025

Download OpenESB product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

May 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

OpenESB is a Java-based open-source enterprise service bus. It can be used as a platform for both enterprise application integration and service-oriented architecture. OpenESB allows you to integrate legacy systems, external and internal partners and new development in your Business Process.

OpenESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

West

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

June 2025

Free Report: OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.