We performed a comparison between OpenESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)."The core is very stable."
"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."
"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."
"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"It is stable."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."
"The documentation needs to be better."
"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."
"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
OpenESB is ranked 13th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 4 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 25 reviews. OpenESB is rated 8.6, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Enables us to define the business process and integrate it with other software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". OpenESB is most compared with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Mule ESB and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and Fiorano ESB.
See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.