OP5 Monitor vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

11,308 Views
5,541 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OP5 Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and OP5 Monitor compete in the IT infrastructure management sector. ScienceLogic has the upper hand due to its advanced automation and integration capabilities.

Features: ScienceLogic offers superior automation capabilities, seamless hybrid cloud integration, and comprehensive monitoring solutions. OP5 Monitor provides strong customizable monitoring options, enhances process efficiency through tailored configurations, and ensures flexibility in monitoring tasks.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve user interface intuitiveness, enhance cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises, and streamline deployment complexity. OP5 Monitor may benefit from expanding advanced automation features, improving scalability for large enterprises, and enhancing integration options with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic delivers robust support and a deployment approach ideal for complex enterprise environments. OP5 Monitor provides a straightforward setup process, flexible deployment options, and customer service that focuses on customization potential, resulting in a short deployment time conducive for businesses seeking easy implementations.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing model aligns with its advanced features, offering substantial ROI for businesses maximizing its capabilities. OP5 Monitor offers a cost-effective solution with lower initial setup costs, attractive to organizations seeking budget-friendly options with effective ROI from customized monitoring capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2026).

OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OP5 Monitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

42nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.8%
OP5 Monitor	0.7%
Other	97.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sumanth Arshanapally

Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Monitoring ease and cost-saving benefits enhance operational efficiency

The monitoring in OP5 Monitor is very easy because we can directly use custom plugins. We can write custom scripts and use those scripts directly. It's very low cost, open, and the dashboards are easy to see. We can extract the reports easily, and this is very easy to compare. Real-time monitoring in OP5 Monitor provides data every one minute or every five minutes, enabling us to get live data from the last one minute or last five minutes. OP5 Monitor gave us proper server availability, so we can always check whether a server goes down or the server CPU and memory decreases. Before reaching a particular bottleneck situation, we identified and fixed the issue, which helped us from a cost-saving business perspective. It helped us avoid application downtime.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."

"Especially with the API, where I can use the data with many other systems, it's great."

"Its open-source environment is accessible to everyone."

"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."

"The monitoring in OP5 Monitor is very easy because we can directly use custom plugins; we can write custom scripts and use those scripts directly, it's very low cost, open, and the dashboards are easy to see."

"Instead of checking the logs each Monday, or checking that applications are running, and checking your ticketing system for angry users, you put this system in place and it monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users."

"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."

"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."

More OP5 Monitor pros

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"The Power Packs that are available are amazing."

"We lacked the power or features that the EM7 dashboards provide, and have won more than one account based on that alone."

"It has allowed us to grow, as we’re able to offer new services to our customers that they didn't have in the past, opening a whole new door of monitoring offerings to our customers and what we can provide for them on top of what we already are providing."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"Customer Service is fantastic."

"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."

"After deploying ScienceLogic in our infrastructure and configured IT services around our critical applications we have experienced a considerable drop in major incidents which impact our customers."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"They need to improve the dashboard interface."

"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."

"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."

"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."

"OP5 Monitor could include application monitoring in addition to infrastructure monitoring. If application business transactions were monitored, it would be helpful."

"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."

"We do not get performance reports properly, which needs improvement."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"Reporting needs to be improved. It was sold as a tool we could use for our clients and it was a complete failure."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"They need a little more self-service."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."

"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."

"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OP5 Monitor?

The price for OP5 Monitor is fine, but we don't know the exact price because it was managed by us; the customer themselves bought it and gave it to us to monitor.

What needs improvement with OP5 Monitor?

OP5 Monitor could include application monitoring in addition to infrastructure monitoring. If application business transactions were monitored, it would be helpful. For application-related issues, ...

What is your primary use case for OP5 Monitor?

Our previous use case for OP5 Monitor was server monitoring.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor

Comparisons

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

Opsview vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs OP5 Monitor

Compared 2% of the time

More OP5 Monitor Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

OP5 Monitor

Download OP5 Monitor product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

OP5 Monitor delivers real-time IT infrastructure monitoring with extensive customization options through open-source plugins. Its intuitive interface and cost-effectiveness make it a preferred choice for efficient performance monitoring and task automation.

OP5 Monitor integrates seamlessly with systems, offering customizable dashboards and efficient performance tracking for networks, servers, applications, databases, and cloud environments. It supports LDAP and local user accounts, providing timely insights to prevent downtime. The documentation enhances integration ease, though its user interface could benefit from updates. Improved APIs, better report capabilities, and enhanced platform integration are needed. Effective in healthcare, maritime, and diverse sectors, it provides global deployments with tailored monitoring solutions.

What are the key features of OP5 Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Tracks performance and alerts users immediately on anomalies.
Seamless Integration: Works effectively with existing systems and infrastructure.
Extensive Customization: Offers open-source plugins for personalized configurations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews for OP5 Monitor?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust features at a competitive price.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies monitoring processes for administrators.
Efficiency in Performance Monitoring: Automates tasks and optimizes resource use.

In industries like healthcare, maritime, and others, OP5 Monitor automates tracking and alerts, easing manual checks to enhance quality. Its global deployments provide tailored monitoring for CPU, memory, and disk space, efficiently managing both on-premise and cloud environments for large-scale operations.

ITRS

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic