Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OP5 Monitor vs ScienceLogic comparison

ITRS and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ITRS is ranked #53, while ScienceLogic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.7. ITRS holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.
OP5 Monitor
Read 6 OP5 Monitor reviews
  • 1,009 Views
  • 123 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
ScienceLogic
Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 2,224 Views
  • 461 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and OP5 Monitor compete in the IT infrastructure management sector. ScienceLogic has the upper hand due to its advanced automation and integration capabilities.

Features: ScienceLogic offers superior automation capabilities, seamless hybrid cloud integration, and comprehensive monitoring solutions. OP5 Monitor provides strong customizable monitoring options, enhances process efficiency through tailored configurations, and ensures flexibility in monitoring tasks.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve user interface intuitiveness, enhance cost-effectiveness for smaller enterprises, and streamline deployment complexity. OP5 Monitor may benefit from expanding advanced automation features, improving scalability for large enterprises, and enhancing integration options with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic delivers robust support and a deployment approach ideal for complex enterprise environments. OP5 Monitor provides a straightforward setup process, flexible deployment options, and customer service that focuses on customization potential, resulting in a short deployment time conducive for businesses seeking easy implementations.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing model aligns with its advanced features, offering substantial ROI for businesses maximizing its capabilities. OP5 Monitor offers a cost-effective solution with lower initial setup costs, attractive to organizations seeking budget-friendly options with effective ROI from customized monitoring capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 858,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OP5 Monitor
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
72nd
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
53rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ScienceLogic
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
26th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (13th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th), AIOps (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of OP5 Monitor is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Harish Venkateshappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful online resources, customizable, and highly effective monitoring
The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users. If there are corrupt files the data can be extracted from them. Anyone who wants to see the performance of memory usage, such as whether it's at 80 to 90 percent, can use this tool. However, other tools can provide this information in two minutes, this tool is more time-consuming and the report it provides is not very effective for practical use. When it comes to reports, the tool falls short. During a recent call, it was noted that while the company has distributed servers across the globe, only the master server can accommodate the reports and events, causing delays. If other servers experience issues, the team cannot view the reporting or tag things, such as for troubleshooting purposes. If this aspect was improved it would be an excellent tool.
Read full review
Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With limited hardware or a virtual machine, you can address a huge network, hundreds of thousands of elements that need to be monitored. Other commercial software is not on that level."
"We can also observe whatever we want, and there are no limitations."
"The API makes it pretty easy to integrate with any system."
"The best feature is that it is very relatable, stable, and scalable. The logger is a part of the software, but it's not the most important point of it."
"It monitors and continuously tests everything that is of importance to you and your users. It could be everything from monitoring disk space to CPU usage to memory. It could include determining if the response time in your e-commerce platform is quick enough, or whether you have too many bounces from some of the pages on your website. You want to monitor anything that could cost you money or time or resources. You can do that with this system. It's very flexible."
"OP5 Monitor is a great choice due to its being built on an open-source monitoring tool and provides ample opportunity for customization based on specific support requirements. It is also user-friendly and easy to manage with a wide range of plugins available for use. In comparison to other enterprise tools, such as Micro Focus, OP5 Monitor stands out for its features and cost-effectiveness, making it the best tool in the market. Customization is one of the key strengths of the tool and provides a lot of capabilities. Additionally, it is easy to find support and plugins for the tool through online resources."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"Power packs."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."
"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
More ScienceLogic pros
 

Cons

"IT environments today are in constant flux. This is driven by the newer cloud technologies such as Kubernetes and Docker, etc. The whole Nagios-based monitoring system that OP5 is created on top of, is based on a host-service model. There is a need for a strategy on what to do with more dynamic environments. There is some cool stuff going on in that direction."
"They need to improve the dashboard interface."
"OP5 lacks some visualization, a feature that makes some other products nice. Op5 is built for purpose, which is fine, but if you compare it with some new products, the visualization is not so appealing, especially for management... If you don't need fancy visualizations, OP5 is fine."
"The solution is useful for tweaking. However, there have been some negative experiences, such as limited report capabilities. The only report available is in PDF format, making it difficult for teams managing multiple servers to extract data in Excel format. The speaker recommends that the team improve the report capabilities to better serve users."
"The user interface is not what we are used to these days, and should be improved."
"We do not get performance reports properly."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"They need a little more self-service."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
More ScienceLogic cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OP5 has a very low price as a solution, compared to many other solutions out there."
"The cost of the license and support are separate. If you want platinum call support, it will cost more than a regular call. I did not opt for it, as it is an additional cost."
"It was not expensive. And because it's less demanding in terms of hardware, you don't have to pay for another SQL or other database license, and you can have a huge installation on one machine..."
"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."
"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."
"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ScienceLogic?
The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 22% of the time
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 19% of the time
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Opsview vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 17% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs OP5 Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
More OP5 Monitor Competitors
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 14% of the time
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic
Compared 12% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic
Compared 10% of the time
Datadog vs ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog vs ScienceLogic
Compared 9% of the time
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 7% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor
June 2025
OP5 Monitor reportDownload OP5 Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
May 2025
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
 

Overview

OP5 Monitor - The Complete Monitoring Solution

OP5 Monitor is a flexible and highly scalable monitoring solution for all sizes of environments. Use just one product to monitor your IT environment regardless of location, whether on-premise, in dynamic environments, public cloud or a hybrid of these.

Digital transformation adds extra layers and complexity to the IT estate by creating a hybrid IT environment of both static and dynamic environments, that can be difficult to monitor efficiently. ITRS OP5 Monitor gives enterprises full visibility over their entire IT estate through a single pane of glass, allowing them to consolidate monitoring tools and cut down costs.

ITRS

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
  • Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
  • Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
  • Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
  • Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
  • Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.
What benefits and ROI should users look for?
  • Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
  • AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
  • Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
  • Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic
 

Sample Customers

Svenska Spel, Carus, VGL, Tele2, Viking Line, Clas Ohlson, Vanderlande, Försäkringskassan
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
May 2025
Free Report: OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
Find out what your peers are saying about OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.