Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Auth0 Logo
9,464 views|6,237 comparisons
Red Hat Logo
1,458 views|1,072 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auth0 and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions).""It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features.""It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy.""The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients.""The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly.""The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase.""It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app.""The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."

More Auth0 Pros →

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well.""Good support for single sign-on protocols.""Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices.""The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.""It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Pros →

Cons
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved.""The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly.""The tool's price should be improved.""I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token.""This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced.""There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that.""There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product.""When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."

More Auth0 Cons →

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated.""Security could be improved.""They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords.""The product’s technical support services could be better."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."
  • "There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."
  • "Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."
  • "It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."
  • More Auth0 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."
  • "If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."
  • "The license is around $8000 USD."
  • "Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."
  • More Red Hat Single Sign On Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the product is scalability.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:It is expensive and not friendly to small developers. On the other hand, Clerk is user-friendly for smaller companies. Auth0 could become more easier. B2B organizations need to catch up with the… more »
    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive. There are similar local solutions available at low-cost.
    Top Answer:The product’s technical support services could be better. Additionally, they should add complimentary software security versions.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    9,464
    Comparisons
    6,237
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    556
    Rating
    8.4
    11th
    Views
    1,458
    Comparisons
    1,072
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    227
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management solution that securely authenticates and authorizes users on different platforms and applications. It offers seamless integration, easy configuration, and reliable performance for managing identity and access. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and support for multi-factor authentication. 

    With robust documentation and excellent customer service, Auth0 enables developers to efficiently implement authentication and authorization processes. Its valuable features include easy integration, robust security, seamless single sign-on, and customizable authentication options. Auth0 also enhances organizational operations and productivity by streamlining processes, improving collaboration and communication, reducing errors, and facilitating seamless integration with existing systems. 

    Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

    Sample Customers
    1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Auth0 vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Auth0 is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 13 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.4, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Provides interface application integration, but Management API needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and Salesforce Identity, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, PingFederate and AWS IAM Identity Center. See our Auth0 vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.