Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Nutanix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 51 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

6,332 Views
6,269 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform compete in container orchestration, with OpenShift having the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust security appealing to enterprises prioritizing security and flexibility.

Features: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine integrates seamlessly with Nutanix infrastructure, offering simplified management and scalability as well as quick provisioning. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift boasts strong security features, extensive ecosystem integrations, and developer tools that provide an edge in flexibility and enterprise level security.

Room for Improvement: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine could enhance integration with non-Nutanix environments and expand its feature set for more diverse use cases. Red Hat OpenShift, while feature-rich, could benefit from simplifying its user interface and decreasing the complexity of its learning curve. Additionally, improving cost efficiency could enhance OpenShift's offering for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is praised for seamless deployment within Nutanix environments with effective support tailored to its platform. Red Hat OpenShift provides flexible deployment over a variety of infrastructures and offers broad ecosystem support, appealing to a diverse range of IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine is known for its cost-effective setup that results in a faster ROI within Nutanix infrastructure. Red Hat OpenShift, despite higher initial costs, demonstrates substantial ROI through feature richness and scalability, catering to businesses seeking long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,623 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.

Read full review

Rifat Rahman

Infrastructure Architect & CEO at Tirzok Private Limited

Integration and automation have transformed deployment and maintenance

Regarding the learning curve, the customers actually do not need the technical nitty-gritty details; they need to know about the containerization journey because they are not familiar with it. They know it as a theory, but they don't understand anything about its practical implications. That's the main challenge. The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage. However, application developers and managers have to understand the beauty of it, and that is the challenge. If Red Hat can execute some programs regarding that, it will help. Regarding Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, it is expensive according to market feedback. Notably, the platform plus is perceived as quite expensive and some features from an infrastructure perspective are lacking.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"My experience with Nutanix's technical support is excellent."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"It automates rolling out new features, packaging the code, conducting security scans, and deploying to OpenShift."

"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."

"Dashboards... give us all the details we need to see about the microservices."

"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."

"I think it's a pretty scalable tool...The solution's technical support has been pretty good."

"OpenShift provides tools that tell me everything I have on a container, and I can make it on-premise or on a cloud infrastructure."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"It's mostly for lab purposes; we haven't seen a lot of traction in the market from enterprise customers yet."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."

"We've encountered challenges when transitioning applications between these environments."

"In my experience, the issues are not always simply technical. They do stem from technical challenges, but they struggle with the topic of adoption. When you encounter all of the customer pull, there are normally several tiers of your client pop that can adopt either the fundamental features or a little more advanced ones. The majority of the time, the challenge is determining how to drive adoption, how to sell the product to the customer, and how much time they can spend to really utilize those advanced features. If we get into much more detail, but this is from my perspective as the platform engineer and not the end customer, the ability of the end user to be able to debug potential issues with their application That is arguably the most important, let's say, work throughput in my area."

"I believe that the documentation part is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."

"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."

"OpenShift Container Platform needs to work on integrations."

"The stability needs improvement."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."

"The product is expensive."

"We currently have an annual license renewal."

"Its licensing is completely incomprehensible. We have special people within our company. They discuss with Red Hat subscription managers. It is too complex, and I do not understand it. We are from the government, and we are trying to be as cheap as possible. Sometimes, I am just amazed at the amount of money that we have to pay. It is crazy."

"We have to pay for the license."

"It largely depends on how much money they earn from the application being deployed; you don't normally deploy an app just for the purpose of having it. You must constantly look into your revenue and how much you spend every container, minute, or hour of how much it is working."

"The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins."

"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?

The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Docker vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 58% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 11% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

September 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

September 2025

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon

No data available

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Broadcom and others in Container Management. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.