"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."
"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."
"Red Hat's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is good. It is a lightweight operating system. You don't have to worry about the security patches on the system. You can update the entire environment with security patches, which is a nice feature."
"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."
"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."
"From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them. So it is a simple matter of just using it with adequate network access, at the network level."
"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
Earn 20 points
Nutanix Karbon is ranked 5th in Container Management with 1 review while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 4 reviews. Nutanix Karbon is rated 0.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Karbon writes "Great that it's embedded in the hypervisor; GUI lacks sufficient information ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Completely removes overhead for our developers in terms of managing orchestration of Kubernetes clusters". Nutanix Karbon is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Rancher Labs, Kubernetes, VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and Amazon EKS, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Rancher Labs, HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Cisco Container Platform.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
