Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros and cons

Vendor: Red Hat
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
665 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform features automated scalability and different deployment routes which enhance service continuity for end-users.
It integrates well with existing CI/CD pipelines, enhancing developer productivity by automating deployments and operations.
Security is robust, offering full-stack protection and seamless updates that simplify maintenance.
It supports easy application scaling, enabling efficient handling of varying workloads and potential cost savings.
Offers centralized control and management of container resources, reducing overhead for developers.

CONS

OpenShift Container Platform's routing capability requires further maturity and better management of IP restrictions.
Identity and access management integration with public cloud services like AWS is difficult and requires improvement.
High complexity in installation, setup, and adoption, including transitioning applications and deploying services, presents challenges.
OpenShift Container Platform is considered expensive with high support costs and pricing plans that could improve.
Documentation, particularly for integration and migration use cases, requires enhancement to aid users effectively.
 

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Pros review quotes

Vlado Velkovski - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2022
The stack in the software supply chain is one of the main reasons that we use OpenShift. When I came to this company, we bought hardware from IBM named Bluemix, and they used ICP, which stands for IBM Cloud Private.
CN
Jun 7, 2021
Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers.
MS
May 9, 2024
For us, the fully automated upgrades are valuable. We have to maintain the clusters in production. For us, it is very important that it does not take too much time to manage all the clusters and do life cycle management and upgrades.
Learn what your peers think about Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
817,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AA
May 4, 2022
The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users.
Ritesh Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 13, 2022
The console or the GUI of OpenShift is awesome. You can do a lot of things from there. You can perform administration tasks as well as development tasks.
reviewer2399271 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 8, 2024
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot to offer to developers, so they don't need to care about the infrastructure or basic setup of the containers, so you can just jump in and develop.
reviewer2060967 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2022
The solution's security throughout the stack and the software supply chain is very reliable. When it was on-prem, it was by default secured by our company firewalls and security tools, and now it's in the cloud, which has its security and systems in place. This provides stability to our infrastructure.
Raju Polina - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2022
The software is user-friendly and straightforward to use, which is favorable to a developer.
Iwona Z - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 22, 2022
The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency.
Xavier J - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 21, 2022
On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down.
 

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Cons review quotes

Vlado Velkovski - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 23, 2022
OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account.
CN
Jun 7, 2021
With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat.
MS
May 9, 2024
We are not big customers of Red Hat, but sometimes, we have severe bugs. We are very innovative, and sometimes, we have to wait for a long time to get proper attention. Red Hat should improve on that.
Learn what your peers think about Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
817,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AA
May 4, 2022
From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them. So it is a simple matter of just using it with adequate network access, at the network level.
Ritesh Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 13, 2022
OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement.
reviewer2399271 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 8, 2024
I believe that the documentation part is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.
reviewer2060967 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2022
Whenever we onboard or deploy services that talk to Oracle Database, they take a lot of time to become active and serve the incoming request, so it would be good to see some improvement here. This could be an OpenShift issue or an internal network problem within our organization.
Raju Polina - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2022
I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process.
Iwona Z - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 22, 2022
In my experience, the issues are not always simply technical. They do stem from technical challenges, but they struggle with the topic of adoption. When you encounter all of the customer pull, there are normally several tiers of your client pop that can adopt either the fundamental features or a little more advanced ones. The majority of the time, the challenge is determining how to drive adoption, how to sell the product to the customer, and how much time they can spend to really utilize those advanced features. If we get into much more detail, but this is from my perspective as the platform engineer and not the end customer, the ability of the end user to be able to debug potential issues with their application That is arguably the most important, let's say, work throughput in my area.
Xavier J - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 21, 2022
The initial setup can be hard.