Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nutanix Logo
447 views|341 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Quorum Logo
587 views|295 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding.""It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites.""The solution is stable.""The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use.""Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful.""We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pros →

"It is a stable solution.""When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy.""The solution offers good documentation.""One of the biggest features is that, even on the absolutely run-of-the-mill box, if I lose any one of my servers I can automatically bring it up virtually on the physical onQ Quorum device.""Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery.""Being able to spin up a machine in a sandbox is amazing because it allows us to test things that we otherwise would not be able to do.""It's easy to implement, easy to spin up, easily configurable, to drop-in appliances and network. There wasn't a lot of time needed to spin it up.""I like this product because it is easy to use."

More Quorum OnQ Pros →

Cons
"The pricing could be better.""For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us.""The solution needs improvement in cost.""I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers.""They need better reporting on the environment.""The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Cons →

"They need integration with other platforms.""The cost could be reduced.""We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them.""The price is high and could be more competitive.""There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond.""The user interface needs to be improved.""There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone.""One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

More Quorum OnQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."
  • "I always want it to be cheaper."
  • "One-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received."
  • "It is a little bit cheaper than the other products in the market. It is affordable."
  • More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."
  • "When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."
  • "The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."
  • "The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."
  • "The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."
  • "The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."
  • "When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."
  • "The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
  • More Quorum OnQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use.
    Top Answer:Nutanix may be perceived as expensive compared to local vendors. Additionally, one-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received.
    Top Answer:The solution needs improvement in cost.
    Top Answer:Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product. I think it is a very cost-effective solution because it has two parts, one of which is an instant backup, and the other is sending your backup… more »
    Top Answer:There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond. After that, everything was fine with the tool. The response time of the support… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    341
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    834
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    587
    Comparisons
    295
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    438
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nutanix Xi Leap
    OnQ
    Learn More
    Overview
    Nutanix Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) is a fully managed DR service that eliminates the need for a dedicated DR site, minimizes data loss and downtime, and helps organizations meet RTO/RPO SLAs confidently.

    Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

    Sample Customers
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
    LCL Bulk Transport
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Logistics Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Individual & Family Service11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business86%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. Quorum OnQ
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 6 reviews while Quorum OnQ is ranked 20th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 21 reviews. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.6, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Affordable, highly scalable, and outstanding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Took us just hours to do a complete server restore, with minimal downtime". Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with Zerto, VMware SRM, Azure Site Recovery, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Acronis Cyber Protect and N-able Cove Data Protection. See our Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. Quorum OnQ report.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.