Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Proxmox VE comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

StarWind Virtual SAN
Sponsored
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
187
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (1st), HCI (4th)
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructur...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
195
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (2nd), HCI (3rd), Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) (1st), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (4th)
Proxmox VE
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Server Virtualization Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

HCI
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

JG
Mar 28, 2022
Cost-effective with top-tier support and offers a highly available environment
The most valuable aspects are the support and the high availability. They offer top-tier support. The support staff is knowledgeable and very willing to help. The proactive support option is unlike any support I've ever dealt with. If anything gets out of sorts, the team is on top of it with an email. Achieving a highly available environment can be hard to execute and lead to a hardware vendor lockin. StarWind is hardware agnostic and supports as few as two hosts to create a fully functional, hyper-converged, highly available server cluster at a fraction of the cost of other vendors.
Giovanni SHOLAY - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 15, 2023
Easy to manage with a centralized dashboard and fast restore capabilities
The management is very easy. You can see everything within a single platform to manage your databases. Everything is there on a single dashboard. NCI's features helped our organization reduce downtime greatly. We use it effectively for replication as well. The ability to restore within seconds is great. It takes a few seconds to rewind back to a previous marker and have everything up and running again. We migrated other services over to Nutanix. For example, we migrated over from Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows us to manage everything from one single platform and to save on licenses. We no longer have to license all of these different types of hardware. It's easy to launch on demand if you are using a newer OS.
Saiful Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 22, 2023
Open-source, user-friendly, and offers good high availability
We use the solution for managing infrastructure like VMs It's really helped my day-to-day activities. I started my career ten years ago, and it's made my work very simple.  It's very user-friendly.  The solution is relatively easy to use. Migrations and backups are easy. It offers good high…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"High Availability is the best feature of product."
"The most valuable feature is the reliable storage replication, which enables me to create a robust infrastructure to run our business."
"The StarWind VSAN is always up and allows us to move VMS to other nodes for maintenance, without interruption to service."
"StarWind support has been great in helping resolve other issues not caused by their software."
"The iSCSI protocol is quite simple to configure."
"The available GUI is excellent for monitoring and operating the system in an easy and direct way."
"It has allowed us to save a lot of time and money by letting us create a vSAN within a Windows VM on the environment it controls."
"StarWind is very easy to use, even if you have had no experience using a SAN before."
"We really love the Lifecycle manager and one-click upgrades."
"Being able to upgrade our entire cluster with the click of a button during business hours with zero downtime has made managing our infrastructure so easy."
"The solution is well integrated with other vendors."
"The most valuable features are the user-friendly dashboard and that we don't need to move resources manually when adding new nodes into running clusters."
"You can be sure that whatever you patch is already compatible with the current firmware and the current version of the Acropolis that you're using."
"It has seamless expandability."
"Some of the most valuable features of Nutanix Acropolis are that it's free from Nutanix and it's very stable."
"The most valuable features are easy cloud administration and management."
"Proxmox allows us to achieve affordable performance while keeping high levels of data protection and flexibility."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it allows customers to use the power of KVM easily."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is migration."
"Proxmox VE has many containers. You need to download the image and do basic configuration, after which it is operational within a few minutes. The solution provides many containers that are light in use and don't use a lot of memory. You don't have to spend a lot of resources."
"The backup service, which was released recently, and that we are already using, is wonderful."
"The virtualization is good."
"We now have the ability to quickly build and deploy VM desktops for application testing with the snapshot ability to rollback, as required."
"It fits in well with our organization. It works and does what it says it does."
 

Cons

"I would like additional documentation regarding possible networking configurations with 10GbE switching."
"The only way I can see this product needing improvement is the consultation level of the StarWind sales and engineers."
"It would be helpful to have a little more insight into what kind of performance the VSAN cluster is utilizing; something that would be more proactive on our side, versus their ProActive Support."
"The documentation could be better."
"A great feature would be a wizard and to include a new disk in the SAN. At the moment, including a new disk requires several steps - some that must be done at the OS level and others in each node."
"Management of VSAN itself could be improved. A Web UI for management would be great rather than an application installation. StarWind is testing a command center virtual appliance that I have installed in my environment."
"This product could be improved with the inclusion of new health check procedures."
"It is difficult to control all of the hardware components."
"Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure's LTS version needs to be more reliable."
"I believe that improvements could be made in regards to the DR in addition to deduplication and integration with others platforms. They also do not offer opportunities for network virtualization so it would be nice to see that in the future."
"Notifications could be improved as they're not currently very useful."
"I would like to see official compatibility with Red Hat in the future."
"The ability to create clusters faster would be nice to see in a future release."
"In the future, I would like Acropolis to add support for publishing external storage."
"The patch updates of Nutanix Acropolis could be improved. I'm work on the corporate side, but I get feedback from our IT team that patch updates and other updates are taking a significantly longer time. This definitely needs to be resolved. We are in discussion with Nutanix regarding certain configuration issues we are having, so maybe something can be changed to ease these patch updates."
"Deployment could be more user-friendly - currently, it requires certain skills with the network and nodes."
"Its user interface can be improved. In the version that I am using, not all functions can be performed by using the UI. There can be some improvement on that. I'm assuming that it has already been improved in the latest version."
"The virtualization can be better."
"Proxmox VE needs to make a deal with Veeam. I was also unable to make version upgrades. I have also encountered backup problems."
"It is difficult to remove a virtual machine."
"I can't speak to any improvements. It is not lacking features."
"It might be interesting to have the ability to integrate with other cloud solutions."
"Its performance and support can be improved. Currently, there is a cost for support."
"My impression is that currently, this solution is not stable even after multiple versions of improvements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution has competitive prices and the implementation is very easy."
"There are two tiers of support and in my opinion, support is worth the cost."
"The free version is great to use for labs or test environments."
"The premium support from StarWinds is a must have. The ability to have access to a storage engineer 24/7 is a must for a production environment."
"The licensing is a bit weird. If you license the standard version of StarWind, it allows you four terabytes. Then, they have a pro version, but with the pro version, the only difference is it doubles the terabytes to eight."
"The StarWind VSAN business model is very cost-effective."
"The support contract is well worth it. The price for it was very reasonable and their team has been very engaged whenever we reach out."
"StarWind is best price/performance for SMB."
"There is a license required for this solution and my clients usually purchase a two-year license with extended support. The price of the solution could be reduced, it is more expensive than competitors."
"Pricing varies greatly between license and editions."
"It's a cost-effective solution"
"The price of the solution could improve. Nutanix has recently changed its pricing model from perpetual to subscription. They have identified there are challenges with the pricing model."
"They should lower the price. If they did they would fall into a more competitive market because the price does scare a lot of potential customers away when they get the quote."
"The price of the solution is high."
"The initial cost is affordable but the renewal fees are high."
"Able to grow with smaller, more linear increments of investment"
"The way the licensing of Proxmox is structured, you can use it for free. It is an open-source solution, and you can use it for free, but if you do need support, then you have to pay for the support. So, you can use it in a way that you don't have to pay anything, which is a plus point for me. For people or users who have huge and more intense use cases, the advice or the recommendation is to always pay for support. In case something goes wrong, you can fall back on the team that will attend to your request. For me, at the moment, the cost is zero."
"Proxmox VE is affordable. It's cheaper than Hyper-V, Huawei Desktop Protocol, and Huawei Desktop Cloud."
"The price of the solution is priced low."
"I cannot subscribe to Proxmox VE's support because it is expensive."
"I am not aware of the licensing cost, but there is a cost for support."
"The product is free."
"The tool is free."
"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.
800,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user244362 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 30, 2015
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about StarWind Virtual SAN?
It is easy to use and can monitor system synchronization and check Storage status. StarWind Virtual SAN (VSAN) combin...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StarWind Virtual SAN?
Pricing on this product is controlled largely by the number of nodes and the storage volumes involved. One of the cut...
What needs improvement with StarWind Virtual SAN?
In the next release, StarWind should include enhanced integration with cloud services for more seamless hybrid cloud ...
What is the biggest difference between Nutanix Acropolis and VMware vSphere?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interfa...
How do I choose between Cisco Hyperflex HX Series and Nutanix Acropolis AOS?
Cisco HyperFlex HS series vs Nutanix Acropolis AOS Cisco HyperFlex gives extended hyper-convergence functions from ...
Which would you choose - Nutanix Acropolis AOS or VMware vSAN?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interfa...
Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?
For me the biggest impact is the cost of licensing in the case of VMware despite its overall intuitiveness and ease o...
How does Proxmox VE compare with Hyper-V?
One of the best things about Proxmox VE is that it is open-source and very inexpensive. You get all of the same featu...
Proxmox VE or KVM?
I use Proxmox VE and have been very happy with it. In my opinion, it is a complete and stable solution with excellent...
 

Also Known As

StarWind SAN & NAS
Nutanix Acropolis AOS, Nutanix AOS, Nutanix Acropolis
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Baker Tilly BVI, CMS Internet, Board Harpeth Hall School
St. Lukes Health System, the City of Seattle, Yahoo! Japan, Sligro, Empire Life, Hyundai AUS, and many others.
Municipality of Trento, SwitchMIA, inDenova, Valmeita City Council, Alpha IT AS, Grupo Inversor Veracruzano S.A.P.I. de C.V. (GRIVER), Laut und Schoen, IT-Services - Hamburg e.K., KMI Learning, Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd., Serwise AG
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, VMware, Nutanix and others in HCI. Updated: August 2024.
800,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.