No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nanonets vs UiPath IXP comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Sponsored
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
670
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (1st), Agentic Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (2nd), AI Legal & Compliance (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (1st)
Nanonets
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath IXP
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nanonets is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath IXP is 4.8%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere3.4%
UiPath IXP4.8%
Nanonets1.5%
Other90.3%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Nadeem K. - PeerSpot reviewer
Rpa Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Automation has freed teams from repetitive finance and supply tasks and supports global operations
In the current organization, we had trouble initially because I think the documentation and support could be better than what it is now. This is one difference between Automation Anywhere and other RPA tools such as UiPath. In UiPath, if you have an issue, you go to the UiPath website and search for it, and you get lots of help materials. In Automation Anywhere, you do not get exactly what you are looking for. You get a very large number of results when you search for something, and from this large result set, you have to filter out what you need, or only partial information will be available. User handbooks are available for each product. In that regard, I would say Automation Anywhere is lagging compared to other RPA tools. It is difficult to get hold of their customer support team. I want to clarify that it is not a matter of us building logic on Automation Anywhere and it failing. When it is a product-related issue, they have to give us support because we only know how to develop within Automation Anywhere. We do not know how to fix Automation Anywhere itself. Whenever we have an issue, trying to get in touch with them always takes three to four business days.
reviewer2855805 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Automated invoice conciliation has reduced manual checks and now delivers accurate OCR data
The best features Nanonets offers are OCR and integrations. These features have reduced manual efforts significantly. Currently, manual checking of data between the database and invoices is no longer necessary, as AI is now performing that work. Nanonets is an AI OCR model that I trained to deliver purposeful output. As an AI model, I can briefly describe and extract data from documents. Nanonets is primarily focused on documents, allowing me to extract data, compare it, and it is also useful for handwritten documents. It delivers output that is 99% accurate for handwritten documents as well. I consider Nanonets a good tool that I have worked with, and I have worked on its integration using Python.
SE
Consultant at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Automation has transformed invoice extraction and has reduced manual processing time dramatically
When it comes to improvements in UiPath IXP, there is a challenge with different languages, particularly Arabic invoices or handwritten ones, where there is some mismatch or difference in extraction. This could be improved. For instance, if there is a "Z" available on the screen, it may be identified as "2." Improvements in these two areas from the extraction point of view are necessary, along with considerations regarding pricing levels. In terms of support, UiPath is performing very well. Whenever we require assistance from UiPath, it has been positive. However, I would suggest that there is room for improvement in identifying complex different layout invoices, particularly for handwritten text, since there is potential for improvement in that area.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can be used for customer service support, data extraction, data migration, and software installation."
"Automation Anywhere provides the best feature to make a software bot for processes."
"They can build an end-to-end solution with Automation Anywhere."
"We have leveraged automation to increase economies of scale and value-added work while reducing operating costs."
"I realized that Automation Anywhere is much easier, more reliable, and has value for money with good and vast customer support."
"With the rebate processing automation that we did, it has provided us a savings of around an hour or two a person on a daily basis, which is quite a lot of savings."
"The most valuable feature of Automation Anywhere is the ease with which it integrates with our existing APIs."
"Automation Anywhere has led to faster growth in our organization."
"The accuracy percentage of Nanonets was around 92-93%, which has had a high impact because it has reduced approximately 9.2 FTEs in manual efforts."
"The best features Nanonets offers include their workflow and OCR detection capabilities, which have positively impacted my organization by helping detect edge cases in OCR that require some post-processing or pre-processing and have improved efficiency and reduced errors."
"Nanonets has positively impacted my organization by providing a solution that works for us as developers."
"There are many features that can be added to the action center to keep humans in the loop to evaluate the accuracy of the extracted data."
"It shortens the time of extracting data by 70 to 80%."
"The solution removes manual processes and reduces human dependency. It takes a lot of effort to go through each physical mail or email, extract the data and transfer it to Excel. However, the solution automates the process and works 24/7. The tool gives a complete package to process and understand documents. The valuable features include taxonomy modification, classification, workstation, etc. There are out-of-the-box features like ML models which you can custom build. We have saved time with UiPath Document Understanding. We have seen a 50 percent improvement in scanning processes. Compared to humans, the tool runs 24/7. The human error rate has also been reduced. Our human error rate is five percent now compared to the previous 15 percent. UiPath Document Understanding has also freed up our staff who now spend more time on critical tasks."
"For me, the most valuable aspects of UiPath Document Understanding are its time efficiency and minimal human intervention."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good."
"We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft."
"UiPath enables us to automate manual tasks and duplicate them easily. The processes are highly accurate."
"UiPath Document Understanding cuts down a lot of order processing time and agents' time, saving both human effort, which in turn translates to better cost efficiency."
 

Cons

"IQ Bot should have an easier way to tag the document's source after extracting information from the document. (Which group does the document or a transaction belong to)."
"One aspect I don't appreciate about Automation Anywhere is the way variables are handled. Many things seem to become a string, which makes it hard to code and keep track of items when everything's a string."
"IQ Bot is pretty good, but we can only run a maximum 150 documents."
"Automation Anywhere could benefit from a more technical focus."
"As a developer, the biggest con is the lag; it's pretty inconvenient to face that delay in things happening."
"Web automation capability needs to be improved."
"We are having trouble creating a reliable and stable situation in our environment."
"I would like more integration with Microsoft Excel. More screenshots that can be integrated with Excel would help our customers too."
"Nanonets can be improved with a larger number of samples and test scenarios."
"I have observed that while training Nanonets, we must provide a larger number of examples or documents."
"I think Nanonets can be improved as the pricing seems to be a bit high, which is one of the things they should improve."
"The extraction can be better. ABBYY FlexiCapture has more capabilities than Document Understanding. It can also extract automatically without training, whereas with Document Understanding, we need to train everything."
"It would be ideal if they could include more packages for more use cases."
"The licensing model poses a significant challenge due to the fee charged for posting a model, which impedes the development of productivity-enhancing models."
"UiPath Document Understanding can improve its handwriting and signature recognition."
"The downsides are that it's wildly overpriced."
"I would like to see more integration of artificial intelligence. That's being implemented, but it would be a massive improvement to the solution's document processing. If UiPath achieves intelligent document processing, it will be far better than anything on the market. There are currently some limitations with the fields that could be addressed using a GPT engine. With an integrated AI model, you wouldn't need to create your taxonomy. You would only need to provide some prompts, such as "What is the property name?" It will store that as a variable."
"UiPath Document Understanding has challenges with handwriting and screenshots."
"UiPath Document Understanding's ability to read handwritten files has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not cheap, with costs ranging between 700 to 800 dollars per month. While Power Automate is cheaper at 15 dollars per month, Automation Anywhere offers superior features, user-friendliness, and smoothness."
"Automation Anywhere is expensive."
"I am not responsible for the pricing part, but I know the pricing is competitive compared to other tools."
"They recently launched a Community Edition, which is okay, but they should have done this a long time ago."
"Automation Anywhere is competitive... Pega is somewhat comparable, but Pega also requires a lot more infrastructure and a lot more experience to get up and running."
"The enterprise version is expensive for small businesses and individual users."
"I don't know exactly what the pricing schemes are for the product as this type of negotiation is not my responsibility, but I think the basic pricing comes to $15,000."
"From my experience, I can say that the initial setup cost is easily recovered over a period of time once the bots start running in production."
Information not available
"UiPath is a pricey tool for small customers."
"UiPath Document Understanding compared to the competitors is high."
"The price for UiPath Document Understanding is a bit expensive."
"We received a 60-day free trial before having to purchase a license to continue using UiPath Document Understanding."
"For the licensing part, in our company, we initially started off with a monthly plan, but yearly plans are also there. Cost-wise, UiPath Document Understanding is good since it provides flexibility in its pricing."
"While Robotic Process Automation tools can be expensive, UiPath Document Understanding is no exception."
"The solution’s cost increases for machine learning or artificial intelligence because we have to go for UiPath Orchestrator."
"The price is on the high end."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business163
Midsize Enterprise86
Large Enterprise566
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise26
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
What needs improvement with Nanonets?
Nanonets can be improved with a larger number of samples and test scenarios. I would suggest training Nanonets simila...
What is your primary use case for Nanonets?
I use Nanonets for OCR purposes, specifically for invoice conciliation. For invoice conciliation, I used Nanonets to ...
What advice do you have for others considering Nanonets?
Nanonets's AI capabilities are secure. Regarding Nanonets's accuracy and reliability of output, in my use cas...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been somewhat complex. I feel that the pricing structure is...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
When it comes to improvements in UiPath IXP, there is a challenge with different languages, particularly Arabic invoi...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Document Understanding?
We have been using UiPath IXP previously after utilizing UiPath's Document Understanding for one of our clients. ...
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)
No data available
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nanonets vs. UiPath IXP and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.