N-able MSP Manager vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL] comparison

N-able and OpenText are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Additionally, 75% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

N-able MSP Manager

Read 5 N-able MSP Manager reviews

1,562 Views
1,047 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Read 48 OpenText Service Manager [EOL] reviews

79% willing to recommend

N-able MSP Manager

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between N-able MSP Manager and OpenText Service Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM).

To learn more, read our detailed IT Service Management (ITSM) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,943 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able MSP Manager

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (24th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (22nd)

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

GeorgeKanellopoulos

CTO at InTTrust SA

Ticketing has helped prioritize support tasks while contract and project management have required better integration and pricing flexibility

I don't know if N-able MSP Manager could have some additional features in the future to make it more competitive because it might already be available and I'm not aware of it.I cannot say that N-able MSP Manager dashboard is intuitive, but I don't see any big difference with ManageEngine. From the deployment perspective with N-able MSP Manager, I cannot have higher expectations because it is a SaaS solution, so it was deployed as is from the technical perspective. From the business perspective, the deployment is complex, but I cannot tell you that it is less complex than ManageEngine. The main reason that made me change my mind and proceed with ManageEngine is the availability of add-ons in combination with their pricing.

Read full review

Dirk Leitermann

Senior Consultant Project Management & Transition at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It does what it should, but it's quite outdated.

I rate Micro Focus Service Manager four out of 10. I wouldn't recommend it. I would suggest ServiceNow. There may be solutions better suited for smaller companies. There are always alternatives because the architecture isn't terribly complex. The architecture is the same across solutions, and everything is linked. There are no modules to be bought from some other company in the past and integrated. ServiceNow also its disadvantages, but if you compare it to Service Manager, I can safely say ServiceNow is the future and Service Manager is the past.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"At a significantly lower price, I managed to get project management modules, contract management, and CMDB, which were not all available in N-able MSP Manager."

"The best advantage for us, since we use all N-able products, is that the MSP portal centralizes everything."

"This is a premier product and it has been around for a long time."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration with our mail system."

"Don't get scared of the price tag because it's definitely worth it."

"I like that you can do all the things with it. You can patch, and you can run the scheduled tasks. You can remote in, upload files, and download files. You can log onto a computer PowerShell, or command prompt, without having to log into RDP. I also like its ease of use."

"We are an MSP, and for what we do, we have one centralized dashboard, and even though we're a small IT team, we can manage a ton of clients with a lot of automated processes, even for patch management."

"It's mostly so reliable and has a lot of functionality. We're using a lot of HPE tools and we can do a lot with it. So, its functionality is the most valuable feature."

"It gives us better understanding and control of service management."

"HP products generally have always been stable, and this is no different."

"I advise others to use the HP Service Manager because it's a powerful and capable enterprise solution."

"We mostly use it as a platform for our service desk to streamline and optimize."

"Fast, responsive and modern design."

"Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."

"The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation, bringing efficiency as well as the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs, with productivity and collaborative capabilities being some of the key benefits."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] pros

Cons

"Its reporting is lousy and bad. It is not as good as it should be. There is too much work involved to get what you want. Most times, you have to call them to customize some stuff. I just don't like that part. They need to work on their reporting. They have a way to go."

"I'd like to see a way to import contacts in bulk using an Excel sheet or another import method."

"The tool needs to improve its customization of the user interface."

"There are too many products out there. What I would like to see is a simplified solution that is packaged better, where you can easily implement or turn on the functionality that you need."

"Comparing the pricing of N-able MSP Manager to ManageEngine, it is a little bit too high."

"Its reporting is lousy and bad. It is not as good as it should be."

"What I would like to see is a simplified solution that is packaged better, where you can easily implement or turn on the functionality that you need."

"My big concern is that HPE made a decision in its last dot release to change the way that these improvements and enhancements are done by the end user."

"Life cycle management is a drama."

"We had quite a lot of issues with stability and the quality of the product so far."

"It's not user friendly (too complex), and it gives limited guidance documentation of how to filter all the logs detected."

"Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required."

"Their end-user interface and technical support features could be improved."

"I think the best recommendation to Micro Focus would be to increase awareness and the marketing for this product."

"With the new version moving toward the codeless configuration is good, but it's losing flexibility."

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Don't get scared of the price tag because it's definitely worth it."

"I don't know the exact cost, but I know it's reasonable. Its cost of entry is not bad. I've had other organizations sign up for it. I don't know how much they paid, but it wasn't bad. You charge for every object. You charge for AV, and you charge for servers. There is a charge for everything or every object in that. I know we make money from it, but I don't know what it is."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten since it's not the cheapest one in the market."

"The license is not cheap."

"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."

"I pay for Service Manager on a yearly basis, and the price is reasonable - I would rate it five out of ten."

"HP Service Manager has moderate pricing."

"Micro Focus Service Manager is a little cheaper than other options. You have to pay a monthly subscription fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able MSP Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able MSP Manager?

I am deploying it for my company.I inherited an implementation with N-able MSP Manager that was not quite good. I faced problems managing the contracts, translating them into technical topics, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able MSP Manager?

I use N-able MSP Manager ticketing system.It has helped to prioritize tasks. At the level that I am aware of the product capabilities in N-able MSP Manager, I can't say that the centralized custome...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 17% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 15% of the time

TeamSupport vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 6% of the time

SysAid vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More N-able MSP Manager Competitors

ServiceNow vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

SCSM vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Service Management (SMAX) vs OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able MSP Manager

April 2026

Download N-able MSP Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Service Manager [EOL]

April 2026

Download OpenText Service Manager [EOL] product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds LOGICnow, SolarWinds MSP Manager

Micro Focus Service Manager, HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager

Overview

N-able MSP Manager provides centralized tool integration and ticket management, improving remote access, task scheduling, and file transfers. Features like real-time reporting and Passportal integration enhance performance for MSPs.

N-able MSP Manager supports Managed Service Providers with remote management, patch management, encryption, and network monitoring. It seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems such as RMM Insight and N-central. The SaaS platform ensures automatic updates, and features like automatic ticket creation and time-tracking optimize operations. Some challenges include reporting, agent deployment via Group Policy, and improving customization, particularly in Microsoft environments.

What are the key features of N-able MSP Manager?

Centralized Portal: Enables seamless tool integration and efficient ticket management.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy task scheduling and file transfers without RDP logins.
Real-Time Reporting: Offers network reporting with multi-tenant capability for better decision-making.
Customizable SLAs: Enhances service management tailored to client needs.
Passportal Integration: Provides quick and secure credential access.

What should users evaluate in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Look for improvements in remote management and integration ease.
Cost-Benefit: Assess functionality versus cost compared to alternatives.
SaaS Advantages: Continuous updates and support without manual intervention.
Task Optimization: Review features like time-tracking and task assignment accuracy.

N-able MSP Manager is often implemented in industries requiring robust remote management and network monitoring. Managed Service Providers leverage its integration capabilities for streamlined operations, while sectors needing complex contract management might encounter translation challenges in technical implementations.

N-able

Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Longleaf Systems, ITproMedia, Choice Technology, Halski Systems, Allixo Technologies, Nettech, Concept Technology

resultspositive, Globicon

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.