MSP360 Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

MSP360 and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. MSP360 is ranked #51, while OpenText is ranked #47. MSP360 holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of MSP360 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

6,852 Views
4,180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

8,800 Views
8,096 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and MSP360 Backup are key competitors in the data protection and backup market. OpenText Data Protector appears to hold an advantage due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, although MSP360 Backup is favored for its user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers advanced functionalities such as automated backup, comprehensive data recovery options, and solid integration with various systems. MSP360 Backup is noted for its simplicity, efficiency in backup processes, and support for multiple cloud storage options.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing OpenText Data Protector's performance regarding backup speeds and modernizing some of its older components. MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved reporting functionalities and more detailed technical support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText Data Protector requires more time and expertise due to its complex configurations, but users commend its customer service for being responsive and knowledgeable. MSP360 Backup is simpler to deploy, appealing to less tech-savvy users, though some have noted that customer service could be more proactive and thorough.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features. MSP360 Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup that aligns well with its target market of small to mid-sized businesses. Users feel that MSP360 Backup's lower costs and ease of use deliver good value.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (36th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (30th), MSP Backup (6th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.1%
MSP360 Backup	1.1%
Other	97.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One massive advantage of this solution, as compared to more enterprise products, is that no firewall changes are needed on the client's premises. For the product to back up from the client's premise to the cloud, it just needs port 8 and port 443, which are anyway always open. This was one of the things that made us decide to go with the product. It is very difficult to justify a firewall change for a small client who doesn't even know what a firewall is and how to maintain a firewall, or doesn't have anybody maintaining their firewall. You then have to maintain the firewall. MSP360 Backup takes away firewall change requirements, VPNs, or channels that are needed for the backup."

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"

"MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface."

"Technical support is very good."

"I liked the way the product worked, its flexibility on the storage and cost, and the way it was supported."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

More MSP360 Backup pros

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"The database it provides is the most valuable feature for us."

"The initial setup wasn’t that complex, because Data Protector recognized all the tapes automatically, and we could adapt some settings."

"Data Protector is a very mature product that allows custom backups, scheduling, and copying in a manner that reduces the amount of time spent with backups from an administrative point of view."

"For us, disaster recovery is the most valuable feature."

"We rely on generating daily reports on our stocks for auditing purposes, and those reports are useful, so I would say they are the most valuable feature."

"The file system backup (by far, the most used) is the most valuable feature."

"Data Protector helps us to maintain data consistency and recover data with minimum downtime."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"We could basically use just a more concise visual dashboard reporting on the status of the various machines."

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"The main improvement is that it should have GDPR compliance. That's the problematic point. They say they are GDPR compliant, but they are not."

More MSP360 Backup cons

"I don't use it today on a regular basis, but there are always feature improvements that our customers are looking for, such as more integration from an API perspective with different applications and cloud platforms."

"The biggest area of improvement for Data Protector would be the proper functioning and ease of configuration of clients behind firewalls and other security mechanisms."

"In v7, some W2012 clients fail occasionally."

"Data Protector's main single point of weakness is its GUI."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

"Unfortunately, Data Protector is not exactly the tool for that task."

"It works with virtual machines, but it's way too complex right now."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 4% of the time

Backup4all vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

GoodSync For Business vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

October 2026

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

October 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Cloudberry Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

MSP360 Backup offers peer-to-peer backup, client-side encryption, and seamless integration with top cloud storage providers, appealing for its ease of use, minimal setup, and robust capabilities.

MSP360 Backup is designed for disaster recovery, workstation, and server backup in cloud environments. Organizations benefit from its compatibility with storage options such as OneDrive, Google Drive, and AWS, supporting incremental backups and ensuring secure data with client-side encryption. The platform facilitates error notifications and corrections, making it a reliable choice for backing up critical information. Despite its effectiveness, users see room for improvement in interface design, bug fixes in the Linux version, and support for more cloud providers.

What are the key features of MSP360 Backup?

Peer-to-Peer Backup: Enables direct data transfer between systems without intermediary servers.
Client-Side Encryption: Protects data by encrypting it before transmission.
Block-Level Transfers: Reduces backup times by only transferring parts of changed files.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with OneDrive, Google Drive, AWS for flexible storage choices.
Incremental Backups: Streamlines configuration and minimizes storage by updating only changes.
Reliable Scheduling: Offers robust scheduling options for automated backups.

What benefits should users look for in MSP360 Backup reviews?

User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of navigation with minimal learning curve.
Efficient Error Alerts: Helps quickly identify and resolve backup errors.
Technical Support: Provides excellent customer service for troubleshooting and guidance.
Backup Flexibility: Offers varied backup methods tailored to individual organizational needs.

In industry applications, organizations employ MSP360 Backup for virtual machine, physical computer, and confidential data management. It is used extensively for offsite backups by micro enterprises and integrates well for client data management, virtual machine, and SQL backup purposes, especially useful for daily monitoring post migrations.

MSP360

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

StratX

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

November 2026

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.