MSP360 Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

MSP360 and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. MSP360 is ranked #54 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. MSP360 holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of MSP360 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

853 Views
370 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,359 Views
719 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and MSP360 Backup are key competitors in the data protection and backup market. OpenText Data Protector appears to hold an advantage due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, although MSP360 Backup is favored for its user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers advanced functionalities such as automated backup, comprehensive data recovery options, and solid integration with various systems. MSP360 Backup is noted for its simplicity, efficiency in backup processes, and support for multiple cloud storage options.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing OpenText Data Protector's performance regarding backup speeds and modernizing some of its older components. MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved reporting functionalities and more detailed technical support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText Data Protector requires more time and expertise due to its complex configurations, but users commend its customer service for being responsive and knowledgeable. MSP360 Backup is simpler to deploy, appealing to less tech-savvy users, though some have noted that customer service could be more proactive and thorough.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features. MSP360 Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup that aligns well with its target market of small to mid-sized businesses. Users feel that MSP360 Backup's lower costs and ease of use deliver good value.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

54th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (42nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (29th), MSP Backup (4th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to access and handles things efficiently."

"Provides connectivity to a lot of different cloud storage solutions."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"The most valuable feature for me is that I can see what has has been successfully backed up and what not. I do not mean the file or folder view, because that's problematic with GDPR, but I mean which machines have successfully backed up. It's very valuable because you don't have to check the machines. The second feature is that you can change backup settings in the portal."

"Technical support is very good."

More MSP360 Backup pros

"The stability of the product seems to be quite good."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"The initial setup is straightforward if you understand Data Protector."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"If you have an idea of what you are doing, it's very flexible and very stable."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"The product could be more user-friendly."

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"The initial setup is a little complex as it has to be done in the office and requires someone to come in and install the solution on your server, then configure the scheduling, backup pushing, and so on."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

More MSP360 Backup cons

"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MSP360 Backup?

MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MSP360 Backup?

The product could be more user-friendly. Its pricing needs improvement as well.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MSP360 Backup?

We use the platform for VM and SQL backup purposes.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 22% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 20% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 12% of the time

NinjaOne vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 10% of the time

Comet Backup vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 9% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 53% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

June 2025

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Cloudberry Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

StratX

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.