MSP360 Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

MSP360 and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. MSP360 is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. MSP360 holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of MSP360 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

827 Views
632 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,381 Views
837 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and MSP360 Backup are key competitors in the data protection and backup market. OpenText Data Protector appears to hold an advantage due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, although MSP360 Backup is favored for its user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers advanced functionalities such as automated backup, comprehensive data recovery options, and solid integration with various systems. MSP360 Backup is noted for its simplicity, efficiency in backup processes, and support for multiple cloud storage options.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing OpenText Data Protector's performance regarding backup speeds and modernizing some of its older components. MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved reporting functionalities and more detailed technical support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText Data Protector requires more time and expertise due to its complex configurations, but users commend its customer service for being responsive and knowledgeable. MSP360 Backup is simpler to deploy, appealing to less tech-savvy users, though some have noted that customer service could be more proactive and thorough.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features. MSP360 Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup that aligns well with its target market of small to mid-sized businesses. Users feel that MSP360 Backup's lower costs and ease of use deliver good value.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

55th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (43rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (28th), MSP Backup (4th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"Technical support is very good."

"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

More MSP360 Backup pros

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"It works excellently only with Oracle."

"Backup of SAP/Oracle -- they are more robust than the competition."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"If you have an idea of what you are doing, it's very flexible and very stable."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."

"The solution's pricing is very high."

"We could basically use just a more concise visual dashboard reporting on the status of the various machines."

"The main improvement is that it should have GDPR compliance. That's the problematic point. They say they are GDPR compliant, but they are not."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"The product could be more user-friendly."

"The initial setup is a little complex as it has to be done in the office and requires someone to come in and install the solution on your server, then configure the scheduling, backup pushing, and so on."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

More MSP360 Backup cons

"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."

"Virtualization."

"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."

"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."

"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MSP360 Backup?

MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MSP360 Backup?

I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MSP360 Backup?

The product could be more user-friendly. Its pricing needs improvement as well.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 29% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 22% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 15% of the time

NinjaOne vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 14% of the time

Comet Backup vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 11% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 65% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

April 2025

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Cloudberry Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

StratX

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.