MSP360 Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

MSP360 and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. MSP360 is ranked #58, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. MSP360 holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of MSP360 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

2,414 Views
1,569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

3,326 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and MSP360 Backup are key competitors in the data protection and backup market. OpenText Data Protector appears to hold an advantage due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, although MSP360 Backup is favored for its user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers advanced functionalities such as automated backup, comprehensive data recovery options, and solid integration with various systems. MSP360 Backup is noted for its simplicity, efficiency in backup processes, and support for multiple cloud storage options.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing OpenText Data Protector's performance regarding backup speeds and modernizing some of its older components. MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved reporting functionalities and more detailed technical support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText Data Protector requires more time and expertise due to its complex configurations, but users commend its customer service for being responsive and knowledgeable. MSP360 Backup is simpler to deploy, appealing to less tech-savvy users, though some have noted that customer service could be more proactive and thorough.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features. MSP360 Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup that aligns well with its target market of small to mid-sized businesses. Users feel that MSP360 Backup's lower costs and ease of use deliver good value.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

58th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (47th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (33rd), MSP Backup (7th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
MSP360 Backup	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature."

"One massive advantage of this solution, as compared to more enterprise products, is that no firewall changes are needed on the client's premises. For the product to back up from the client's premise to the cloud, it just needs port 8 and port 443, which are anyway always open. This was one of the things that made us decide to go with the product. It is very difficult to justify a firewall change for a small client who doesn't even know what a firewall is and how to maintain a firewall, or doesn't have anybody maintaining their firewall. You then have to maintain the firewall. MSP360 Backup takes away firewall change requirements, VPNs, or channels that are needed for the backup."

"The best feature is that it's very user-friendly to do scheduled backups and version maintenance."

"I was mainly concerned with cloud backups, OneDrive backups, consumer OneDrive, business OneDrive, Google backups, and SharePoint backups. The solution did a good job of the backup."

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

More MSP360 Backup pros

"The initial setup wasn’t that complex, because Data Protector recognized all the tapes automatically, and we could adapt some settings."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"It is our enterprise backup solution centralizing all backup needs."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"Data Protector allows us to improve our SLA in successful backups and the reporting tools integrated with our management console make possible 99% backup success in our clients."

"Reading the manual and following instructions will result in a working version."

"Data Protector is absolutely stable for us."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."

"The main improvement is that it should have GDPR compliance. That's the problematic point. They say they are GDPR compliant, but they are not."

"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."

"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"We could basically use just a more concise visual dashboard reporting on the status of the various machines."

More MSP360 Backup cons

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

"Faster VEAgent Restores"

"We think troubleshooting is one of the most difficult parts in this product. It is hard to find any signs for job errors and why a job did not run successfully."

"Technical support is OK. They responded to me within a reasonable time, but the person with whom I spoke didn't really know how to do or understand what I was doing."

"The technical support is poor and should be improved."

"It took a long time to resolve some of the implementation issues."

"A lot of internal database corruptions (sometimes it becomes serious); the user has to back up the IDB daily and do the daily maintenance."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"The solution is expensive."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"We have a very good return on investment."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 5% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 4% of the time

BDRShield vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 3% of the time

Backup4all vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 2% of the time

Comet Backup vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 2% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Dell Data Protection Advisor vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

March 2026

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Cloudberry Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

StratX

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.