Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #52. Microsoft holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Microsoft DPM

Read 21 Microsoft DPM reviews

4,148 Views
3,775 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

7,451 Views
6,855 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft DPM

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Microsoft DPM and OpenText Data Protector are direct competitors in the data protection space. While Microsoft DPM is favored for its integration with Microsoft's suite, OpenText Data Protector offers advanced features for robust data management.

Features: Microsoft DPM is valued for integration with Microsoft technologies, efficient backup for Windows servers, and reliance on Azure for cloud-based services. It provides seamless backup and restore for Microsoft environments, excellent integration with System Center, and supports online backups. OpenText Data Protector excels in data scalability, cross-platform compatibility, and integration with various operating systems and applications. It supports SAP/Oracle backups, has a flexible and intuitive user interface, and provides reliable disaster recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft DPM could enhance its support for non-Microsoft platforms, improve reliability with fewer update issues, and offer better performance consistency. OpenText Data Protector might benefit from a simplified deployment process, improved integration with cloud services, and enhanced data backup speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft DPM is noted for straightforward deployment in Microsoft-centric infrastructures with minimal guidance due to its intuitive nature. OpenText Data Protector involves a more complex deployment process but offers comprehensive documentation and support to aid clients. Microsoft users find rapid setup, while OpenText provides expansive support for intricate deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft DPM traditionally offers a lower initial setup cost, particularly attractive to businesses in the Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing ROI through reduced integration expenses. OpenText Data Protector, despite higher upfront costs, often justifies its expense with extensive functionality and long-term scalability, beneficial for enterprises requiring advanced data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,394 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft DPM

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Microsoft DPM is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft DPM	0.9%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	98.1%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Nirukshitha Gamage

Senior Manager - System Infrastructure Software Support Team at DMS Electronics (Pvt) Ltd

User finds setup straightforward but seeks wider platform support and advanced features

Microsoft DPM could implement backup capabilities for third-party systems such as Linux. They also need to consider other features such as replication to DR sites, similar to what Veeam and other products offer. Microsoft DPM didn't have that capability at that time. If they want to remain competitive in the market, they need to observe the competition and implement improvements. The backup should have compression, deduplication, and DR replication. They should also improve monitoring of the environment. Microsoft DPM didn't have these basics at that time. If they had continued development on the products, they could have reached a higher level, especially given Microsoft's significant presence and majority of servers. Microsoft DPM didn't have any support structure in the backend. If they had a support structure, we could have escalated issues. I never received any support from Microsoft DPM.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution really does great recovery."

"I could back up all the stuff we had, even the VMs we have for Hyper V."

"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."

"Microsoft DPM is scalable."

"The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."

"It is almost perfect for Microsoft products. It is not a very powerful tool, but it is okay for small sites and small businesses with Microsoft products. It is easy to use for backup and restore. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers such as Exchange and SharePoint servers."

"The most valuable feature is the total integration of the System Center solution."

"The most valuable feature is the recovery."

More Microsoft DPM pros

"Overall, this is a good product and it hasn't given us any problems."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"I've used the product for a long time and am very familiar with all its features."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"Data Protector is very good at automation; from the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good, and I don't need to touch it because it will do it by itself."

"The database it provides is the most valuable feature for us."

"It is more user-friendly."

"The most valuable features include Sharepoint item-level restore and integration with the vSphere hypervisor."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The DPM is pretty good, but when it comes to external devices, you can't back up to the external device."

"You have only a few settings and if you change them for some special configurations, it's very difficult."

"Optimization of fabric administrator cause management problem to arise in backup administrator as it leads to the backup software failure in a manner that cannot be foreseen or anticipated finding backup administrators unawares."

"Setting up the solution can be complex."

"The user interface can be improved quite a bit."

"The solution isn't completely stable."

"The real hands-on experience with DPM is that it's difficult to set up unless you get it right first time, the agent processes gobble CPU and i/o, and if you're unfortunate enough for your DPM primary to go awol, you're faced with building a complete DPM network again because the secondary/ies will refuse full backups if the primary isn't there."

"They could improve the compatibility and integration with other products and the ability to do file-to file backups of other products."

More Microsoft DPM cons

"I think their support is OK, but not very good."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"This tool is also missing some configurations and functionalities that I want."

"Some security aspects in Data Protector could be improved."

"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."

"Data Protector is great software, but after we started getting support from Micro Focus, it was taking too much time, there was too much delay."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"A lot of internal database corruptions (sometimes it becomes serious); the user has to back up the IDB daily and do the daily maintenance."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support."

"Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support."

"Microsoft DPM can be considered as an expensive solution for smaller or medium enterprises, but we have been satisfied with the price structure as it is fixed and it offers a variety of useful features"

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft DPM?

The pricing of Microsoft solutions rates in the middle range at five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities. AI integration is not necessary for backups as this is not a security solution.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft DPM?

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

Catalogic DPX vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft DPM Competitors

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

VM Explorer vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM

September 2026

Download Microsoft DPM product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Microsoft DPM is a comprehensive backup and recovery software that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, providing efficient recovery capabilities and ensuring compatibility across workloads.

Microsoft's Data Protection Manager offers significant integration capabilities with Microsoft applications and Azure Active Directory for Single Sign-On, enhancing scalability through integration with System Center. It supports streamlined backup solutions for both physical and virtual Microsoft environments, with automated operations and a user-friendly interface. While DPM showcases robust file search capabilities, time-saving functionalities, and enhanced security measures, improvements are needed in third-party integrations, backup for external devices, and affordable cloud storage options. Enterprises might face challenges due to complex configurations and limited user-community support.

What are the key features of Microsoft DPM?

Seamless integration with Microsoft Apps: Provides straightforward integration for enhanced operational efficiency.
Efficient Recovery Capabilities: Enables quick data restoration to minimize downtime.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Facilitates Single Sign-On for easier access control.
Compatibility with System Center: Enhances scalability and management efficiency.
Automated Operations: Streamlines backup processes, reducing manual effort.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Strong file search capabilities contribute to data protection.
Time-Saving: Quick recovery processes improve operational efficiency.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies backup management for IT teams.

In industries such as consulting, local government, and data centers, Microsoft DPM plays a critical role in managing backup and recovery operations. Organizations rely on it to safeguard environments, including ERP systems and virtual machines, by supporting daily, weekly, and incremental backups, disaster recovery, and data replication across physical Windows Servers, Hyper-V Servers, SharePoint, and more.

Microsoft

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft DPM vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.