We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Mindjet MindManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"I like the product's screen share feature since we can explain things to the users at the other end using it. The solution helps me to establish a virtual connection with my team."
"It's great for meetings and even hybrid classes, for example, where the teacher has students attending in person and online at the same time. It's really convenient for that too, and I like that you can easily share presentations."
"Microsoft Teams has helped us improve collaboration through the use of chats, as well as conferencing, voice calls, knowledge management, and maintaining a repository."
"There is a new Skype feature in Teams that is excellent."
"Message and chat retention is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collaborate."
"The solution integrates with project management products like Jira."
"The most valuable feature is being able to export to Microsoft Project."
"We have experienced response delays with the product. It can be hard to understand where to click in the solution. Also, the solution should incorporate videos like 'How to use Teams' that can be popularized among customers."
"It takes me time to adapt to the new improvements in the product, and they don't add too much value for me. I would prefer Microsoft Teams to reduce their frequent updates."
"Microsoft Teams could work faster if set up on other devices like cell phones."
"There needs to be a robust change management platform that offers training to keep the user community aware of upcoming updates and features."
"Since Microsoft Teams is a typical Microsoft product, inviting guest users to the conversation can be problematic if they're not in the active directory."
"In future releases, short voice messages would be useful."
"It may be a little daunting to learn and is still a tool in development."
"I would like to see more customization options in the product such as more integration with other tools."
"Since I have been using such an old version, most of the improvements have already been made, but I would suggest moving forward with the times and creating a cloud-based solution for universal access."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while Mindjet MindManager is ranked 4th in Mind Mapping Software. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Mindjet MindManager is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mindjet MindManager writes "An Easy to use tool for brainstorming and planning, compatible with Microsoft Project". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Mindjet MindManager is most compared with Visio, draw.io, Office 365 and Atlassian Confluence.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
