Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs Okta Platform comparison

Microsoft and Okta are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Okta is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 3.4% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Okta’s 13.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Okta users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Read 8 Microsoft Entra Verified ID reviews

1,165 Views
419 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Read 87 Okta Platform reviews

7,630 Views
1,297 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Okta Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Okta Platform and Microsoft Entra Verified ID compete in the identity and access management category. Okta seems to have the upper hand with its flexibility and comprehensive feature set, especially in environments that require diverse application integration, while Microsoft Entra shines in environments centered heavily around Active Directory.

Features: Okta Platform provides extensive automation and user provisioning, adaptive multi-factor authentication, and efficient lifecycle management. It offers seamless integration with a wide range of applications and centralized app management. Microsoft Entra Verified ID specializes in seamless integration with Active Directory and offers robust on-premises and cloud feature support, benefiting environments reliant on Microsoft services.

Room for Improvement: Okta needs improvements in lifecycle management and third-party tool integrations, with a call for more customizable reporting capabilities and pricing concerns. Microsoft Entra Verified ID faces challenges in hybrid cloud setups and complex policy requirements and needs enhancements in its biometric features and API integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta's deployment versatility across hybrid and multi-cloud environments is noteworthy, with commendable customer service and technical support, albeit with occasional delays. Microsoft Entra Verified ID provides solid cloud capabilities, but its hybrid cloud integration can be complex, though its customer service remains consistently supportive.

Pricing and ROI: Okta's pricing is considered high, especially for SMEs, but users justify the cost with its robust features and security, resulting in time savings and improved IT efficiency. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is also viewed as expensive but offers strong ROI through integration with Microsoft services and enhanced identity management. Both solutions are valued for their security and operational efficiency despite cost concerns.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (20th)

Okta Platform

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (6th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (6th), AI IT Support (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra Verified ID is 3.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Platform is 13.3%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Okta Workforce Identity	13.3%
Microsoft Entra Verified ID	3.4%
Other	83.3%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

MuhammadWaqar

IT Director at Interwood Mobel Pvt Ltd

Supports user management and authentication but needs simpler hybrid integration for broader adoption

I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions. An ease for hybrid integration would greatly help the technical teams. I believe the policy implementation is a little bit complex on the Microsoft side; there should be a simpler way to implement policies, utilizing standardized templates for compliance, such as industry-specific templates for the service industry, which would be helpful for HIPAA and other compliances.

Read full review

SumitMundik

Lead Admin Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Authentication process improves security with quick and intuitive user interface

The best feature is the speed and execution of Okta Workforce Identity. The moment you click on single sign-on, you immediately get the notification on your mobile phone, then you do the authentication and within a second you get authenticated. The entire customer experience is very good. The user interface is pretty simple, straightforward, and really good. Multi-factor authentication in Okta Workforce Identity is very useful so people who do not have access or are trying to access using just a user ID and password will be completely blocked because of this two-factor authentication. You will get the code, and as your device is authorized in the system, only that device can be used for the authentication purpose. A third person trying to access or hack your data will not be able to do that anymore. Additionally, you don't have to remember your passwords going forward. Previously, every 60 days or 90 days, passwords kept changing. With the two-factor authentication or single sign-on option in Okta Workforce Identity, you don't have to remember it anymore or write down passwords in plain text. If something goes wrong, we have the IAM team which can unlock your account immediately if you have issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are mainly in the areas of security and auditing."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has smoothed out our identity verification process and made it easier for us to authenticate users, making us more confident about our users being who they say they are so we can trust that we have secure logins for all our users."

"Microsoft Entra Verified ID has helped reduce fraud or impersonation attacks because if you are using a government-sanctioned ID, what is more secure than that?"

"I find Microsoft Dynamics 365 very easy and useful because most of the users on our end are using Microsoft, thus they are very familiar with the Microsoft Office stack, and some of SharePoint and Teams."

"The authentication features of Microsoft Entra Verified ID are valuable. As an infrastructure professional, I appreciate the exceptional integration between on-premises Active Directory features and Entra ID."

"The MFA number matching feature effectively prevents unauthorized access by phishing bad actors who might obtain email credentials. This feature requires users to verify a number on their screen, ensuring they only approve genuine requests."

"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it's simple enough to deploy."

"It is very seamless."

"The impact of SSO on my IT overhead and user experience has been significant because it reduced authentication fatigue, password sharing, and password reusing."

"The product requires very little maintenance."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."

"The feature that is most valuable to me is the automated user provisioning that we set up using Okta as a major part of that process."

"The most valuable feature of Okta is its security."

"The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."

More Okta Platform pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, particularly in the integration with other platforms, as they could do better with the API, for example."

"There are issues with the integration of Microsoft Entra Verified ID and MFA. Sometimes, the MFA process doesn't succeed, requiring users to sign out and log back in."

"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."

"Microsoft products basically have no support other than the knowledge base, so I would give it a two out of 10."

"The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"While Microsoft continues to improve the solution, integrating the ID with biometric features could be enhanced, especially in terms of standard B2C flows for multi-factor authentication. Improvements in remembering devices and the timing of MFA triggers could also be beneficial."

"I believe there should be an easy provision for the on-premises and for the hybrid environment in Microsoft Entra Verified ID, as there seems to be some difficulty with hybrid implementations, especially in a country like Pakistan where most are transitioning to cloud but not fully migrating, instead opting for hybrid solutions."

"I have not really seen return on investment with Microsoft Entra Verified ID."

"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."

"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."

"Okta has a limitation with directory integrations. If you have multiple Active Directory integrations, the user distinguished name (DN) and the manager DN don't get imported properly into the Okta user profile."

"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."

"The initial setup could be easier to do."

"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."

"The initial setup can be complex at first."

"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."

More Okta Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and setup are standard. With Entra, you choose between P1 and P2 licenses. We recommend having at least one P2 license in a company for better alert management, even though P2 is more expensive."

"If one is cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the product price as seven."

"I still feel the pricing is on the higher side for larger customers. They don't pay anything for on-prem Active Directory. Although we receive additional features with Microsoft’s SSO, pricing is an area Microsoft can work on."

"Though I don't know about the licensing model of the product, I wouldn't be surprised if Okta offers a per user license subscription model."

"This solution is costly. Pricing is decent if you have less users, but it significantly goes up the more users you have, with its cost not justified."

"Okta's pricing is right where it needs to be and right in the middle of the market."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Okta has fairly competitive pricing."

"Workforce Identity is well-priced."

"It has a yearly subscription. As compared to its competitors, it is quite expensive. It also has a complex licensing model."

"Price-wise, Okta Workforce Identity is a cheap solution. The overall cost depends on the license since you can negotiate with Okta or any of Okta's partners only if you opt for many licenses."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

It is hard for me to say how Microsoft Entra Verified ID can be improved. I really do not know the extent of how that can benefit everything. I am trying to learn that here at the Ignite conference.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My main use cases for Microsoft Entra Verified ID are verifying the end user saying who they are and being able to back that up with government-issued proof.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Entra Verified ID?

My organization has not implemented the Face Check feature yet; we are using YubiKeys. My organization's trust in digital interactions really has not changed since implementing Microsoft Entra Veri...

See all answers

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 11% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 10% of the time

Onfido Real Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Verified ID Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 11% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Saviynt vs Okta Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID

December 2025

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

December 2025

Download Okta Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

Overview

Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a managed verifiable credential service that lets organizations build unique user-owned identity scenarios designed for trustworthy, secure, and efficient interactions between people and organizations. Transform the way you perform identity verification with verifiable credentials.

Face Check with Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a premium privacy-respecting facial matching feature powered by Azure AI services that unlocks high-assurance identity verification at scale. It matches a user's real-time selfie with a trusted identity document – such as a driver’s license or a passport – without ever passing or storing personal data, providing secure, trustworthy verifications for organizations and a quick, simple experience for users.

Learn more about Microsoft Entra Verified ID

Microsoft

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Platform report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.