Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete comparison

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete compete in the endpoint security category. Based on user reviews, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint holds the upper hand in integration and ease of use, while Symantec Endpoint Security Complete excels in threat intelligence and response capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates seamlessly with Windows, provides efficient threat detection, and automated investigations. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete offers advanced threat intelligence, detailed reporting capabilities, and in-depth threat response features.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve support for non-Windows operating systems, offer more granular control over policies, and enhance reporting features. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete needs to speed up software updates, reduce false positives, and simplify its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users find deployment straightforward, especially within Microsoft 365, and praise its responsive customer service. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete offers a more complex deployment but compensates with thorough support resources and proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is generally more cost-effective, noted for high ROI due to its lower price point and integrated features within Microsoft environments. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, though higher in initial cost, is considered valuable for its extensive security capabilities.