Microsoft Azure VMware vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 2.7% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Red Hat’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure VMware

Read 3 Microsoft Azure VMware reviews

234 Views
36 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 62 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

120 Views
93 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VMware

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift and Microsoft Azure VMware are competing in the cloud infrastructure space, offering container and virtualization solutions. Red Hat OpenShift has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas Microsoft Azure VMware excels in features due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift provides a robust Kubernetes-based platform with extensive tools for container orchestration, management, and development, adaptable across hybrid cloud environments. Microsoft Azure VMware delivers seamless compatibility with VMware infrastructures, a strong suite of virtualization tools, and integration with Azure's ecosystem, efficiently extending legacy workloads to the cloud.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift simplifies application development with a container-focused deployment model and unified management interface, supporting diverse cloud infrastructures for flexibility. Microsoft Azure VMware offers a familiar virtualization environment, easing the transition to cloud services with native Azure integration and featuring responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift has a scalable pricing structure suitable for varying enterprise needs, offering cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI. Microsoft Azure VMware involves higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI through operational efficiency and comprehensive virtualization support, justified for businesses seeking expansive virtualization solutions with Azure services integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure VMware

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (9th), Container Management (12th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure VMware is 2.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 3.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

BachirAbderrahmani

Cloud Architect at CGI

Offers a lot of flexibility during the migration to users

I cannot tell you exactly what will be added except one thing. The tool already did a great job integrating the native Azure SaaS and PaaS solutions. I think the tool can do better integration. We need to have a dedicated network connectivity with a dedicated ExpressRoute circuit. For example, in our experience with this client, we ended up with two circuits for ExpressRoute. If the tool can do better and flawless integration with the native Azure services, it will be a good enhancement. What we have right now is not bad, but it is an area where the tool can do a little bit of enhancements.

Read full review

Pratul Shukla

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management

Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The capabilities are like a lift-and-shift operation for moving existing VMware environments to the cloud. The time for migration onto the cloud has substantially reduced."

"For new users, if you have a scalable environment where a VMware data center makes sense for your business, I definitely recommend AVS."

"Regarding stability, it is like a five-star solution."

"The integration is very good."

"Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."

"OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes."

"OpenShift is more enterprise-oriented, offers good support, and provides integration with multiple solutions."

"The solution offers ease with which we can define how to run applications and configure them. It's much more convenient than creating a virtual machine and configuring application servers, making the process faster and simpler."

"The developers seem to like the source-to-image feature. That makes it easy for them to deploy an application from code into containers, so they don't have to think about things. They take it straight from their code into a containerized application. If you don't have OpenShift, you have to build the container and then deploy the container to, say, EKS or something like that."

"The virtualization of my APIs means I no longer have to pay VMware large amounts of money to only run in-house solutions."

"It has features that enhance security, ease of deployment, and service exposure compared to Kubernetes."

"Its interface is good. The other part is the seamless integration with the stack that I have. Because my stack is mostly of Red Hat, which is running on top of VMware virtualization, I have had no issues with integrating both of these and trying to install them. We had a seamless integration with the other non-Red Hat products as well."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"Well, sometimes they release product after product, so it's it's kind of hard to keep an overview of all the different aspects of of the solutions."

"Azure VMware needs to cater to smaller enterprises, as it is currently meant for larger entities. One improvement could be more support for mid-sized or scalable environments."

"Azure VMware needs to cater to smaller enterprises, as it is currently meant for larger entities."

"The only issue is that a small challenge was found regarding the network...to have extended, smooth VLANs and everything else was a little bit complicated."

"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."

"I think that OpenShift has too many commands for running services from the CLI, and the configuration files are a little complicated."

"The GUI could have more capabilities, particularly around virtualization."

"OpenShift requires a very expensive and complex infrastructure. These demands can deter people from learning OpenShift."

"The solution needs to support the new features in Kubernetes more quickly."

"They could work on the pricing model, making it more flexible and possibly lower."

"The solution only offers support for one server."

"The metrics in OpenShift can use improvement."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To be honest, the tool comes at a high price."

"The solution is very competitive."

"The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 per month."

"The model of pricing and buying licences is quite rigid. We are in the process of negotiating on demand pricing which will help us take advantage of the cloud as a whole."

"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"The product’s pricing is expensive."

"It's expensive. It may be cheaper to invest in building Vanilla Kubernetes, especially if security is not the number one motivation or requirement. Of course, that's difficult, and in some business areas, such as banking, that's not something you can put as a second priority. In other situations, a Vanilla Kubernetes with a sufficiently strong team can be cheaper and almost as effective."

"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period."

"The cost is quite high."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure VMware?

The integration is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure VMware?

The pricing is high, rated around nine to 9.5 out of ten. The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 pe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VMware?

Azure VMware needs to cater to smaller enterprises, as it is currently meant for larger entities. One improvement could be more support for mid-sized or scalable environments. The licensing policy ...

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 60% of the time

VMware Cloud on AWS vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 15% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Stack vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 13% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VMware Competitors

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

May 2025

Download Microsoft Azure VMware product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

May 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Microsoft Azure VMware provides a seamless integration of VMware environments into Azure, offering enterprises an efficient way to extend workloads and optimize their IT infrastructure. This facilitates a native VMware experience within Azure, ideal for scaling and modernizing services.

Azure VMware enables businesses to leverage existing investments in VMware tools and skills while taking advantage of Azure's scalability and global reach. Users find it valuable for disaster recovery, datacenter extension, and application modernization. It supports consistent operations and reduces complexity by simplifying operations and cutting IT costs. Additionally, users appreciate its ability to integrate with other Azure services for increased functionality and performance.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure VMware?

Hybrid Platform: Integrates on-premise VMware tools with Azure for consistent management.
Scalability: Easily scale VMware-based applications leveraging Azure's infrastructure.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust solutions for backup and recovery scenarios, ensuring business continuity.
Flexibility: Supports various VMware workloads, optimizing performance and costs.

What benefits should you evaluate in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Potential for reduced IT expenses by utilizing cloud resources for scaling.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations time with easy management and deployment.
Seamless Integration: Preserves existing investment in VMware tools and skills.
Enhanced Security: Utilizes Azure's comprehensive security features to protect workloads.

In industries like healthcare and finance, Microsoft Azure VMware is implemented to enhance datacenter capacities and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Its ability to integrate with existing resources allows companies to transition workloads without significant disruption, providing a flexible and scalable solution that supports innovation while maintaining operational continuity.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.