We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and OneSpan DIGIPASS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The single sign-on is very convenient for us."
"It's a very scalable solution."
"We have not had any formal issues with scalability."
"The scalability of the product is decent."
"The security and compliance features are very helpful. The online information on the site is well documented."
"It's very easy to run and it's part of their ecosystem and I don't think it's going anywhere anytime soon."
"Very stable and scalable IAM service with good SSO and authentication features."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to act as an identity provider for other cloud-based, SaaS applications. In our bank, this is the main identity provider for such features."
"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."
"Everything should be in one package. There are so many different packages. They need to provide guidance because there are so many features and we don't know how to implement them in our organization."
"Sometimes, the notifications and alerts are not delivered properly, and we end up missing them. Also, the overall graphical user interface needs to be improved."
"ESAE management, especially the admin tools, could be improved. It should be built in by the vendor, and I shouldn't have to add patches or updates to connect to my domain directly. It should be added by default. The price could be better."
"The product needs to be more user-friendly."
"The monitoring dashboard could be a bit better."
"There is a concept of cross-tenant trust relationships, which I believe Microsoft is actively pursuing. That is something which in the coming days and years to come by will be very key to the success of Azure Active Directory, because many organizations are going into mergers and acquisitions or spinning off new companies. They will still have to access the old tenant information because of multiple legal reasons, compliance reasons, and all those things. So, there should be some level of tenant-level trust functionality, where you can bring people from other tenants to access some part of your tenant application. So, that is an area which is growing. I believe Microsoft is actively pursuing this, and it will be an interesting piece."
"There is no documentation about how Microsoft will scale Azure AD for customers. It only mentions that it will scale out if you have a lot of requests but does not mention how in detail."
"In a hybrid deployment, when we update a license by changing the UPN or email address of a user, it does not get updated automatically during normal sync. This means that we have to update it manually from Azure, which is something that needs to be corrected."
"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Authentication Systems with 190 reviews while OneSpan DIGIPASS is ranked 22nd in Authentication Systems. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while OneSpan DIGIPASS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneSpan DIGIPASS writes "Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Yubico YubiKey and Cisco Duo, whereas OneSpan DIGIPASS is most compared with Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, RSA SecurID and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.