OpenText Functional Testing and OpenText Silk Test compete in the functional testing category, providing automation and integration capabilities. OpenText Functional Testing has the advantage due to its broad technology support and unified platform for GUI and API testing.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is recognized for its wide compatibility, supporting GUI, API, and database testing from one platform. LeanFT and object spy enhance its functionality. OpenText Silk Test users value its object recognition, support for multiple scripting languages like Java and C#, and easy installation, with an efficient management of test cases.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing faces criticism for high memory usage, slow script execution, and non-intuitive interface. Users desire better tool integration. In contrast, OpenText Silk Test struggles with browser compatibility and documentation support, needing improved Git and Maven integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing often deploys on-premises but allows cloud flexibility. It is noted for straightforward deployment although customer service receives mixed reviews for response times. OpenText Silk Test's installation is seamless, yet feedback on technical support remains inconsistent, requiring faster complexity resolutions.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing's extensive feature set is seen as cost-justified in enterprises despite its high price. It supports legacy systems enhancing ROI. OpenText Silk Test is also costly but competitive, offering favorable ROI due to quick automation capabilities, though initial costs may deter some organizations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.4% |
| OpenText Silk Test | 1.2% |
| Other | 90.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
