We performed a comparison between Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"There is a single pane of glass for user access and a single sign-on facility for the user. If you have already logged in to Microsoft Azure or on-premises, you can redirect directly to Microsoft Endpoint Manager, monitor all your security threats, and analyze the data associated with the application in a single, unified way."
"It's normally able to meet 100% expectations of our customers."
"At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"The solution is easy to use and it has good performance."
"Technical support, in general, has been quite helpful."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"The mobile and tablet-based versions need improvement because they are not completely user-friendly, compared to the web version. Also, data synchronization with our existing asset manager, the synchronization between multiple assets and multiple devices, takes a lot of time due to the security scanning. It should be reduced."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 165 reviews. Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.