ManageEngine IT360 vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

ManageEngine and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #98, while PICO is ranked #73. ManageEngine holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

921 Views
479 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,486 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Pico Corvil Analytics compete in IT operations and network analytics. ManageEngine IT360 seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Pico Corvil Analytics leads in advanced features and value for complex network environments.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 offers specialized IT management functionalities, concentrating on network performance monitoring, server management, and integrating help desk software. Pico Corvil Analytics provides high-resolution network analytics, real-time application performance visibility, and advanced data analytics capabilities that benefit data-driven environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could enhance support for high-resolution analytics, advanced application performance features, and data-driven capabilities. Pico Corvil Analytics might improve its user-friendliness, simplify the deployment process for standard environments, and reduce dependency on extensive training for optimal use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 features a seamless deployment model with strong customer support, ideal for quick implementation. Pico Corvil Analytics is known for its robust deployment techniques for complex setups, requiring specialized handling and offering extensive training and support resources.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 offers competitive pricing with clear ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Pico Corvil Analytics involves a higher initial setup cost but yields significant ROI through advanced analytics, justifying investment for organizations with complex network needs.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

98th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (73rd)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.6%
ManageEngine IT360	0.4%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"The technical support is good."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"I have seen errors where the CNE and the CMC haven't synced because of something missing in the CMC, which was there in the CNE. We would get some type of error, but it doesn't actually say what exactly was missing in the CNE."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

46%

Computer Software Company

10%

Non Profit

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Comparisons

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 20% of the time

Kentik vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 12% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 11% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 11% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 11% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 11% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

January 2026

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

IT360

Corvil

Overview

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

December 2025

Free Report: ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine IT360 vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.