Lumu vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Lumu Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Lumu Technologies is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trellix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Lumu Technologies holds a 1.4% mindshare in XDR, compared to Trellix’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumu Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,503 Views
1,022 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

8,852 Views
2,390 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Lumu

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 14, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Lumu are competitors in the cybersecurity solutions market. Trellix is viewed as having an edge due to its comprehensive features, whereas Lumu is recognized for its real-time threat intelligence capabilities.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform boasts advanced threat detection, integrated EDR capabilities, and automated response mechanisms. Lumu provides continuous network visibility and efficient threat identification powered by sophisticated analytics.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could streamline its cloud-native capabilities and simplify automation processes. Additionally, enhancing real-time threat intelligence could be advantageous. Lumu can improve its complex integrations and extend platform support while reducing false positives for better accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer straightforward deployment models. Trellix is known for thorough onboarding support, while Lumu is commended for faster cloud-native deployment and proactive customer service approach.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix has a higher upfront setup cost but offers a robust feature set which may result in a high ROI for large enterprises. Lumu's cost-effective investment model, with emphasis on rapid threat detection, promises a strong ROI for businesses prioritizing efficiency in threat response.

To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumu

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

18th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th)

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.6%
Lumu	1.4%
Other	95.0%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"The performance is good."

"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."

"It is a stable solution...The solution's technical support is good."

"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."

"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."

"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"The reports need improvement."

"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."

"The security of this solution needs improvement."

"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."

"I would like to have the ability to have more control over the deployment in the next release. If you have this console in the cloud, you cannot make pilot groups for deploying the agents. We only have the current group. So, as soon as you inject the software, it will go directly into production, which doesn't work for us. We need to build up pilot groups slowly. We already requested to have this feature on the cloud, and we are still waiting."

"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."

"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."

"I would like to see more automation."

"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."

"Licensing is paid yearly."

"Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution."

"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."

"There is a one-year and a three-year license available for this solution, we are currently on a three-year license."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	59

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 49% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 14% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 13% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

September 2025

Download Lumu product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Free Report: Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.