Lumu vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Lumu Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Lumu Technologies is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trellix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Lumu Technologies holds a 1.3% mindshare in XDR, compared to Trellix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumu Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,896 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,873 Views
3,061 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Lumu

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Lumu are two competing products in the cybersecurity category. Trellix boasts a comprehensive suite with superior support, while Lumu excels in advanced threat detection and network visibility, although it comes at a higher price point.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security provides robust threat prevention, detection, and response, alongside centralized management through ePolicy Orchestrator, which ensures high-level protection and seamless integration. Lumu offers unique network visibility, enhanced threat intelligence, and in-depth network behavior insights, positioning it as a top choice for threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance adaptability to rapid shifting threats and optimize its user interface for greater accessibility. Lumu, while strong in detection, could expand its comprehensive suite offerings and improve on providing a more cost-effective package for broader market appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers streamlined deployment with extensive support which allows for quick implementation of their solutions. Lumu focuses on simplified deployment with a strong emphasis on network assessment, backed by dedicated support services that enhance customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix demands a higher initial setup cost but delivers a significant ROI through its complete security offering. Lumu, although lower in setup cost, presents significant value investment with its advanced threat detection capabilities, offering a compelling return for its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumu

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (8th)

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

159

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.5%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.5%
Lumu	1.3%
Other	95.2%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.

From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."

"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."

"It's easy to use."

"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."

"The independent modules are very good."

"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The reports need improvement."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."

"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."

"Search feature could be made more user-friendly."

"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."

"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"The tool is affordable"

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"Trellix Endpoint Security is an inexpensive platform."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 27% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

January 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lumu vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.