Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Luigi's Box vs Microsoft FAST comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Luigi's Box
Ranking in Indexing and Search
2nd
Average Rating
9.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft FAST
Ranking in Indexing and Search
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Luigi's Box is 0.2%. The mindshare of Microsoft FAST is 6.2%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Luigi's Box0.2%
Microsoft FAST6.2%
Other93.6%
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

William Berthoud - PeerSpot reviewer
Higher conversion rates with an advanced algorithm and intuitive interface
An area for improvement is the interface language, as our team mainly speaks French. Offering a French-language option would significantly enhance accessibility and streamline usage. Additionally, simplifying interactions with the Luigi's Box team, such as through localized support or tools tailored to non-English-speaking users, would improve collaboration. These changes would ensure a more seamless integration of the solution into our daily operations.
reviewer1466883 - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust solution with good value
Microsoft FAST is quite robust. Our clients are quite happy with it. For other users who already have a solution in place, we recommend Microsoft FAST because it is more compatible and you can organize the solution with Microsoft components. If you are with any other third party, there could be a chance that the required output is not what you would expect. But with Microsoft, it will work better. It is compatible with the older generation systems, so you can offer it. On a scale of one to ten, I would give Microsoft FAST an eight because I'm quite comfortable with it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In analytics, we can see what our visitors can't find with us, because we can look in history to see what products they wanted to search for and couldn't find. We can see the exact number of people who wanted to find something."
"Luigi's Box was easy to implement and allowed me to get started quickly."
"Luigi's Box is helpful in implementing even non-standard requirements."
"This smart search capability significantly reduces the time customers spend searching for products, as it anticipates their needs and suggests the most pertinent results."
"We value the smart search feature the most since it immediately offers relevant results to customers, even if they don't know the exact name of the product."
"With its advanced algorithm and intuitive interface, this tool makes setting up the product feed simple and efficient."
"Luigi's Box is an excellent tool that solves our problems with the search and recommended products in the carousels."
"Its seamless integration with existing platforms streamlines workflows, making it an indispensable tool for businesses of all sizes."
"Microsoft FAST is quite robust. Our clients are quite happy with it."
 

Cons

"It could simplify the implementation on the website."
"Enhancing the reporting and analytics capabilities would provide us with deeper insights into user behavior and search trends, helping us optimize our offerings further."
"However, we know that there's always room for improvement, and Luigi's Box has already made a lot of progress and it is still increasing its value and adding new features."
"We have been using the service for more than two years, and our experience is only positive."
"When setting up banner ads in the search window, it takes a long time for the banners to appear."
"Our products are really diverse. Not everything can be done automatically, and manual intervention is required."
"Deeper use of AI and ML - although with the advent of AI, new features have been implemented into Luigi's Box, there is still room for deeper integration."
"Our team mainly speaks French. Offering a French-language option would significantly enhance accessibility and streamline usage."
"If there is any change in a system or a configuration or an update, we might face some issues."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise1
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Luigi's Box?
Luigi's Box is an excellent tool that solves our problems with the search and recommended products in the carousels.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Luigi's Box?
When implementing, make the most of the knowledge of the person at Luigi's Box who will support you. They have a lot of experience.
What needs improvement with Luigi's Box?
Integration with GA4 and a plugin integrating with Google Looker Studio would be very useful. Currently, I collect data on searches in two places and I cannot conveniently combine them. The efficie...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS FAST
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Notino, Muziker, Under Armour, SFD
Moffitt Cancer Center, Hitachi Solutions, Manupatra Information Solutions, Unique World, _KODA AUTO a.s., MindTree Ltd, Mississippi Department of Transportation
Find out what your peers are saying about Luigi's Box vs. Microsoft FAST and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.