LogRhythm UEBA vs Lumu comparison

LogRhythm and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. LogRhythm is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.0, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.2. LogRhythm holds a 1.1% mindshare in XDR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 55% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm UEBA

Read 11 LogRhythm UEBA reviews

889 Views
752 Comparison Views

55% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 7 Lumu reviews

766 Views
465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm UEBA

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

LogRhythm UEBA and Lumu compete in the security platform category. LogRhythm UEBA seems to have an advantage in customer support and pricing, while Lumu's extensive features and long-term value put it ahead in terms of security capabilities.

Features: LogRhythm UEBA is recognized for its advanced analytics, integration capabilities, and deep insights into network behavior. Lumu provides real-time threat intelligence, streamlined operations, and a comprehensive feature set that matches current security needs.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm UEBA users point out a need for better scalability, enhanced reporting features, and more streamlined integration processes. Lumu could improve its data integration, expand its threat intelligence databases, and enhance real-time response capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm UEBA deployment can be complex, requiring a significant learning curve but supported by strong customer service. Lumu offers a straightforward deployment process with positive feedback on user assistance, providing an easier initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm UEBA offers a cost-effective solution with strong ROI, ideal for budget-conscious users. Lumu, although initially pricier, provides significant long-term value with enhanced security features that justify its expense.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm UEBA

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

25th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (11th)

Lumu

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (10th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of LogRhythm UEBA is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 1.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Sheikh Abu Ayub Azad

CEO at Trustaira

Great at managing cyber incidents; the technical support could be improved

The initial setup is easy, partly because LogRhythm is primarily based on the Windows platform. It's good to have two engineers for deployment but it can be done with one. It's more about the knowledge. Deployment is typically done in two or three different phases. It usually takes up to three full months to get good deployment. There's the initial onboarding of all the log sources, then collecting data in the data lake, followed a couple of weeks later with some minor tuning before the final tuneup.

Read full review

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."

"The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting."

"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."

"I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents."

"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."

"The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting."

"I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

More LogRhythm UEBA pros

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

Cons

"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

"The on-premises LogRhythm is not very scalable. When considering packets per second or the MPS needed for additional logs such as web application logs, scalability is usually found in cloud products."

"The search feature needs to be improved."

"It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices."

"The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs."

"The UI could be improved a little bit."

"LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users."

More LogRhythm UEBA cons

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The reports need improvement."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm UserXDR?

The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solutions such as Splunk are very neat and clean. I would also like to improve the us...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

My company is currently dealing with Lumu's onboarding process. Lumu is used to monitor the environment permanently and validate if there is ransomware that can exploit our infrastructure.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA

Compared 45% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA

Compared 20% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs LogRhythm UEBA

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs LogRhythm UEBA

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs LogRhythm UEBA

Compared 6% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 61% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu

Compared 5% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

April 2025

Download LogRhythm UEBA product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

April 2025

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

No data available

Overview

LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

LogRhythm

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu

April 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.