LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] vs Lumu comparison

Exabeam and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Additionally, 60% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Read 12 LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] reviews

60% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,896 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

LogRhythm UEBA and Lumu are key players in the cybersecurity sector, each with a distinct focus. While LogRhythm offers superior security analytics, Lumu shines with its innovative network exposure visualization, elevating its appeal in comprehensive threat detection scenarios.

Features: LogRhythm offers advanced security analytics, machine learning capabilities, and enhanced threat detection and prevention. Lumu is recognized for network visualization tools, continuous compromise assessments, and a user-friendly interface that simplifies complex data.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm could enhance integrations with external tools, streamline the user interface, and provide better real-time data analytics. Lumu may benefit from deeper analytics capabilities, expanded reporting options, and a stronger focus on predictive modeling to preempt threats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm provides comprehensive documentation and support for easy deployment, whereas Lumu focuses on quick implementation and maintains strong customer support, making it advantageous for rapid deployment needs.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm generally involves a higher initial investment with long-term benefits due to its analytics depth. Lumu offers a cost-effective solution prioritizing ROI through efficient detection features, providing a compelling value with its innovative approach.

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lumu

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Behavior analytics has improved insider threat detection and reduces false positives for our team

The best features LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers are its behavioral balancing, baselining, risk scoring, and correlation with SIEM events, and what stands out most is risk scoring, which gives clear visibility into which user behaviors are genuinely risky and helps our team to focus on the highest priority threats without drowning in noise. Risk scoring helps us to quickly identify which users' activity needs immediate attention by clearly ranking threats based on impact and likelihood; it changes our day-to-day operations by reducing time spent on low-risk alerts and allowing the team to prioritize investigations and response actions more effectively and consistently. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence. I observed a noticeable reduction in false positive alert volume, which shortened the investigation time per incident, improving the mean time to detect and respond, and helping identify high-risk user activities earlier, which prevented potential security incidents from escalating.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems."

"I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."

"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents."

"The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting."

"The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting."

"LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence."

"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] pros

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

Cons

"LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] could be improved with more flexible tuning options and clearer model transparency to better understand why certain behaviors are flagged; enhanced integrations with additional data sources and more intuitive dashboards would also help improve usability and investigation efficiency."

"The UI could be improved a little bit."

"The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."

"It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices."

"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."

"The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] cons

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The reports need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm UserXDR?

The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solutions such as Splunk are very neat and clean. I would also like to improve the us...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 28% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 11% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 6% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

January 2026

Download LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

No data available

Overview

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with an intuitive interface, utilizing correlation, behavior analysis, and machine learning to monitor server threats and privileged accounts effectively.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides comprehensive user behavior analytics and threat hunting capabilities, making use of customizable dashboards, reporting tools, file and registry monitoring. CloudAI adds depth by identifying unknown activities, enhancing network visibility and cyber risk reduction through constant monitoring. Users in Sri Lanka find it valuable for network stability, while other users leverage it for improved user monitoring and quick attack investigation. Despite its strong features, enhancements in integration, pricing in Asia, and documentation could improve its adoption.

What are the key features of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Intuitive Graphical Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience tailored to cybersecurity needs.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized monitoring views and reporting capabilities.
Effective Reporting Tools: Enhances incident analysis and decision-making with detailed insights.
Machine Learning: Identifies patterns in user behavior, detecting anomalies efficiently.
CloudAI: Detects unknown activities, improving threat identification accuracy.

What benefits can users expect from LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Increases network safety through comprehensive monitoring.
Improved Network Visibility: Facilitates better management of cybersecurity resources.
Quick Attack Investigation: Reduces time to detect and respond to threats.
Cyber Risk Reduction: Employs machine learning to address potential security gaps proactively.

In the financial sector, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is implemented to monitor privileged accounts and identify suspicious transactions swiftly. Healthcare organizations use it to safeguard sensitive patient data through behavior analysis. Manufacturing firms apply it to protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Across these industries, the adaptability and analytics of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offer a strategic approach to cybersecurity management.

Exabeam

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, TrendAI, SentinelOne and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.