Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogRhythm UEBA vs Lumu comparison

LogRhythm and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. LogRhythm is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.0, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. LogRhythm holds a 1.0% mindshare in XDR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 55% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.
LogRhythm UEBA
Read 11 LogRhythm UEBA reviews
  • 914 Views
  • 307 Comparison Views
55% willing to recommend
Lumu
Read 8 Lumu reviews
  • 890 Views
  • 398 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

LogRhythm UEBA and Lumu compete in the security platform category. LogRhythm UEBA seems to have an advantage in customer support and pricing, while Lumu's extensive features and long-term value put it ahead in terms of security capabilities.

Features: LogRhythm UEBA is recognized for its advanced analytics, integration capabilities, and deep insights into network behavior. Lumu provides real-time threat intelligence, streamlined operations, and a comprehensive feature set that matches current security needs.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm UEBA users point out a need for better scalability, enhanced reporting features, and more streamlined integration processes. Lumu could improve its data integration, expand its threat intelligence databases, and enhance real-time response capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm UEBA deployment can be complex, requiring a significant learning curve but supported by strong customer service. Lumu offers a straightforward deployment process with positive feedback on user assistance, providing an easier initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm UEBA offers a cost-effective solution with strong ROI, ideal for budget-conscious users. Lumu, although initially pricier, provides significant long-term value with enhanced security features that justify its expense.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm UEBA
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
25th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (10th)
Lumu
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
17th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of LogRhythm UEBA is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 1.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Sheikh Abu Ayub Azad - PeerSpot reviewer
Great at managing cyber incidents; the technical support could be improved
The initial setup is easy, partly because LogRhythm is primarily based on the Windows platform. It's good to have two engineers for deployment but it can be done with one. It's more about the knowledge. Deployment is typically done in two or three different phases. It usually takes up to three full months to get good deployment. There's the initial onboarding of all the log sources, then collecting data in the data lake, followed a couple of weeks later with some minor tuning before the final tuneup.
Read full review
Juan Solano - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing
Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems."
"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."
"The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting."
"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."
"It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring."
"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."
"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents."
"The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting."
More LogRhythm UEBA pros
"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."
"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."
"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."
"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."
"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."
"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."
"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."
"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."
 

Cons

"LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users."
"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."
"The search feature needs to be improved."
"The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."
"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."
"What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product."
"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."
"It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices."
More LogRhythm UEBA cons
"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."
"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."
"Nothing so far needs to be improved."
"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."
"The reports need improvement."
"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."
"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."
"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."
"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."
"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."
"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."
"LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."
"It is quite a budget-friendly product."
"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."
"It is the cheapest solution we found."
"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Educational Organization
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm UserXDR?
The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm UserXDR?
I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?
In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solutions such as Splunk are very neat and clean. I would also like to improve the us...
See all answers
What do you like most about Lumu?
Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Lumu?
There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more p...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Lumu?
We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA Logo
Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA
Compared 43% of the time
Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA Logo
Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA
Compared 20% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs LogRhythm UEBA Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs LogRhythm UEBA
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs LogRhythm UEBA Logo
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs LogRhythm UEBA
Compared 9% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs LogRhythm UEBA Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs LogRhythm UEBA
Compared 6% of the time
More LogRhythm UEBA Competitors
Darktrace vs Lumu Logo
Darktrace vs Lumu
Compared 55% of the time
Wazuh vs Lumu Logo
Wazuh vs Lumu
Compared 11% of the time
Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu
Compared 10% of the time
Vectra AI vs Lumu Logo
Vectra AI vs Lumu
Compared 8% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu
Compared 5% of the time
More Lumu Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
June 2025
LogRhythm UEBA reportDownload LogRhythm UEBA product report
Buyer's Guide
Lumu
June 2025
Lumu reportDownload Lumu product report
 

Also Known As

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
No data available
 

Overview

LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

LogRhythm

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu
June 2025
Free Report: LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu
Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LogRhythm UEBA vs. Lumu report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.