Legit Security vs Mend.io comparison

Legit Security and Mend.io are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. Legit Security is ranked #11, while Mend.io is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. Legit Security holds a 4.5% mindshare in SSCS, compared to Mend.io’s 10.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Legit Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Mend.io users who would recommend it.

Legit Security

Read 4 Legit Security reviews

825 Views
561 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mend.io

Read 33 Mend.io reviews

6,607 Views
1,255 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Legit Security

Mend.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Mend.io and Legit Security are competing in the cybersecurity domain. Mend.io seems to have the upper hand in terms of affordability and support, while Legit Security excels in offering an advanced feature set.

Features: Mend.io facilitates integration with existing systems and robust vulnerability management. It also delivers useful license and copyright reports. Legit Security provides comprehensive threat detection and prevention alongside excellent visibility into software development environments. It enhances security by integrating with multiple tools like Snyk and Jenkins, and offers effective secret management.

Room for Improvement: Mend.io could improve its secret detection capabilities to reduce false positives and enhance overall accuracy. Additionally, refining the onboarding process for first-time users might be beneficial. Extending support for more open-source libraries would further strengthen its offerings. Legit Security could benefit from refining its secret detection feature to lower false positive rates. Enhancing the user interface for easier navigation and providing more robust out-of-the-box integrations could be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mend.io is praised for its easy deployment and responsive customer service, aiding in quick setup and support. Legit Security also offers efficient deployment with a focus on personalized customer service, featuring dedicated assistance for customized support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Mend.io offers competitive pricing, making it appealing for budget-conscious companies. Its favorable ROI adds value for cost-centric businesses. Legit Security may require a higher initial investment, but its sophisticated features justify the cost, offering a strong ROI for those prioritizing comprehensive cybersecurity features.

To learn more, read our detailed Legit Security vs. Mend.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security vs. Mend.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Legit Security

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

11th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mend.io

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (18th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Static Code Analysis (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Legit Security is 4.5%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 10.8%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mend.io	10.8%
Legit Security	4.5%
Other	84.7%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

Tim Crothers

CISO at Mandiant / FireEye

Provides strong visibility, straightforward integration, and reduces the risk of attacks

Legit Security is a product that hyper-focuses on the various aspects of the software development pipeline. For example, if an engineer spins off a new project and stands up a new Git project, Legit automatically detects it, connects Snyk and other tools, and ensures the engineering team doesn't have to think about it. This way, we stay on top of security from the beginning. On the other hand, Legit provides a clear view of the controls around repositories. We have standards requiring code reviews and similar practices, and Legit shows us whether these are being followed. Additionally, Legit helps us identify unmaintained repositories, which often arise when engineering teams try something and leave it behind. This knowledge allows us to determine the appropriate action for these neglected projects. One area where Legit falls short is secret detection. While it functions well overall, the feature has a 10-20 percent false positive rate, requiring some manual intervention. Almost everything else works flawlessly. The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates. Unlike traditional programs that require security reviews at specific stages, hindering development flow, we strive to partner with the product engineering team to ship secure code seamlessly within their existing workflows. Legit plays a crucial role in this by automatically notifying us of new projects, eliminating the need for manual communication. This partnership approach, enabled by Legit, allows us to work much closer with our engineering teams than ever before.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security monitoring has reduced false positives and improves dependency governance

The only area for improvement I would say is that the false positives are nearly zero; everything is mostly like 99 to 99.99% or we can say 100% accurate. There were a few areas for improvement just from the last time I saw; I think the user experience had a little problem. We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports. We had asked for some facility and some ability for us to create some custom reports. That would be awesome if they allow us to create custom reports the way we wanted. There is one small area which I don't know whether we should call a tool limitation or a wish list; if I use a library and I don't use all the capabilities of the library but only a portion of it and that portion is not vulnerable, but there is a component which is outdated, that is a problem, even though I don't use that component. Mend.io will discover there is a problem in the whole library; that is correct. That's a valid discovery, but in my case, for example, if I don't use that particular portion, then it actually is not making sense for me, but that's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."

"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."

"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."

"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."

"The license management of WhiteSource was at a good level. As compared to other tools that I have used, its functionality for the licenses for the code libraries was quite good. Its UI was also fine."

"The overall support that we receive is pretty good. "

"We use a lot of open sources with a variety of containers, and the different open sources come with different licenses. Some come with dual licenses, some are risky and some are not. All our three use cases are equally important to us and we found WhiteSource handles them decently."

"The solution boasts a broad range of features and covers much of what an ideal SCA tool should."

"We can take some measures to improve things, replace a library, or update a library which was too old or showed severe bugs."

"With the fix suggestions feature, not only do you get the specific trace back to where the vulnerability is within your code, but you also get fix suggestions."

"It gives us full visibility into what we're using, what needs to be updated, and what's vulnerable, which helps us make better decisions."

"The solution is scalable."

More Mend.io pros

Cons

"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."

"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."

"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."

"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."

"At times, the latency of getting items out of the findings after they're remediated is higher than it should be."

"Mend lets you create custom policies. They're not too complicated to set up, but it would be helpful if they had some preconfigured policies to match what we have in Azure DevOps. That would save us a lot of time. It's tedious to configure the policies manually, and I lack the capacity to do it right now. Other products have preconfigured packs and templates, and Mend doesn't."

"The only thing that I don't find support for on Mend Prioritize is C++."

"WhiteSource only produces a report, which is nice to look at. However, you have to check that report every week, to see if something was found that you don't want. It would be great if the build that's generating a report would fail if it finds a very important vulnerability, for instance."

"On the reporting side, they could make some improvements. They are making the reports better and better, but sometimes it takes a lot of time to generate a report for our entire organization."

"AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature."

"We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports."

More Mend.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

"When comparing the price of WhiteSource to the competition it is priced well. The cost for 50 users is approximately $18,000 annually."

"The solution involves a yearly licensing fee."

"We always negotiate for the best price possible, and as far as I know, Mend has done an excellent job with their pricing. Our management is happy with the pricing, which has led to renewals."

"Over the last two years, they have tried to add more and more features to their license packages, but the price is a little bit high, comparatively."

"Its pricing model is per developer. It depends on the number of developers in the company. The license is for a minimum of 20 developers. So, even if you are a small startup with less than 10 developers, you have to buy a license for 20 developers on a yearly subscription, which makes it quite expensive for startup customers. I provide consultation to startup accelerators. They're small at the beginning, and only once they grow to 20 developers, they can afford this tool. As a result, WhiteSource is missing this target audience. Their licensing is not flexible."

"The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

"We are paying a lot of money to use WhiteSource. In our company, it is not easy to argue that it is worth the price. "

"It is fairly priced."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mend.io?

Mend.io SCA offers a competitive pricing structure that is relatively affordable compared to similar solutions in the market. This makes it an attractive option for organizations looking to enhance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Docker vs Legit Security

Compared 25% of the time

Ox Security vs Legit Security

Compared 15% of the time

Apiiro vs Legit Security

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ASPM vs Legit Security

Compared 10% of the time

Cycode vs Legit Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Legit Security Competitors

SonarQube vs Mend.io

Compared 16% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Mend.io

Compared 8% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Mend.io

Compared 7% of the time

GitHub Dependabot vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security

January 2026

Download Legit Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io

January 2026

Download Mend.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

Overview

Legit Security provides application security posture management platform that secures application delivery from code to cloud and protects an organization's software supply chain from attack. The platform’s unified application security control plane and automated SDLC discovery and analysis capabilities provide visibility and security control over rapidly changing environments and allow security issues to be prioritized based on context and business criticality to improve security team efficiency and effectiveness.

Legit Security

Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.

Mend.io Features

Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Vulnerability analysis
Automated remediation
Seamless integration
Business prioritization
Limitless scalability
Intuitive interface
Language support
Integration
Continuous monitoring
Remediation suggestions
Customization

Mend.io Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Easy to use: The Mend.io platform is very user-friendly and easy to set up.

Third-party libraries: The solution eases the process of keeping track of all the used third-party dependencies within a product. It not only scans for the pure occurrence (also transitively) but also takes care of licenses and vulnerabilities.

Static code analysis: With Mend.io’s static code analysis, you can quickly identify security weaknesses in custom code across desktop, web, and mobile applications.

Broad support: Mend.io provides 27 different programming languages and various programming frameworks.

Easy integration: Mend.io makes integration very easy with existing DevOps environments and CI/CD pipelines so developers don’t need to manually configure or trigger the scan.

Ultra-fast scanning engine: The solution’s scanning engine generates results up to ten times faster than legacy SAST solutions.

Unified developer experience: Mend.io has a unified developer experience inside the code repository that shows side-by-side security alerts and remediation suggestions for custom code and open-source code.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.

Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”

PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”

An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”

Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

Mend.io

Sample Customers

Google, NYSE, Kraft-Hienz, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and many other large enterprise and Fortune 500 customers. Learn more by going to: https://www.legitsecurity.com/...

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates

Buyer's Guide

Legit Security vs. Mend.io

December 2025

Free Report: Legit Security vs. Mend.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Legit Security vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Legit Security vs. Mend.io report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.