We performed a comparison between Docker and Legit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Supply Chain Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The initial setup was easy, and you are only required to run commands."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The solution's most valuable feature is having containers independent of the operating system or environment."
"We are using Docker to host applications."
"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving."
"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."
"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."
"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."
"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."
"We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system."
"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker."
"If you install Docker on a host, it creates its own firewalls. It can become an issue. Usually, when you want to install Docker, you need to restart the firewall or restart the active tables on the machine, but this is not the case with Kubernetes. It uses the default set up by the next administrator, but with Docker, you have to restart the firewall and restart Docker before the firewall on the system will be okay. If you do not the rules will not be created."
"I would love to have it available on Linux."
"It could be easier to create images and save them on reports. Just improved development workflow, just quicker, like some better user experience creating the images for the Docker containers."
"The command line interface could be more intuitive. I constantly struggle with it."
"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."
"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."
"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."
"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."
"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."
Docker is ranked 4th in Software Supply Chain Security with 40 reviews while Legit Security is ranked 5th in Software Supply Chain Security with 4 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Legit Security is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Legit Security writes "Correlates information based on the integrations I have, which is extremely helpful". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Legit Security is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and Cider. See our Docker vs. Legit Security report.
See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.
We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
