We performed a comparison between Tungsten RPA and WorkFusion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"If you compare it to its competitors in the market, it is more Java-native."
"We have seen Workfusion improve on accuracy and compliance... With the Workfusion model, we reduce human error and the need for further QC. We switch more to a QA process where we're testing whether the model is effective."
"It's a pretty robust product."
"This solution has great document recognition capabilities."
"The dashboard is the solution's most valuable feature. When clients want to look at the data it's very easy for them to do so. The dashboard for the IT manager is very useful if there are issues and to create and follow processes."
"We need to analyze documents in order to understand them. We don't need to dedicate much time to this because WorkFusion's machine learning capabilities are very good. We can easily extract information and classify these documents. The document processing engine is very important to our organization because it is the center for many use cases, as we need to control the information contained in documents."
"The automation process is the most valuable feature."
"Their robots have increased the rate of efficiency by two to five times in our organization. There is still a human element to code out the package running the robots. You can't just click something and have it run. However, once that has been done, you can parallelize it 10 or 100 times in a fairly straightforward manner."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"A better graphical user interface that allows business users to perform automation would make this solution number one in the market."
"This is a Java-based application that takes up a lot of space and when it runs, consumes a lot of memory. This affects the reliability because it gets to a point where it hangs."
"Where it can be improved is the speed. I built two bots, one with WorkFusion and the same thing with Python. My feeling was that the speed at which Python did things, how fast it did them, was quite cool. It was faster."
"The problem with the solution is that it is agnostic, so it's not made for banks. Sometimes we are challenged because of this. We have to make everything from scratch to make it work for our clients."
"One thing we didn't like was their OCR solution. We felt it's somewhat inefficient."
"One of the issues that we are facing here in China, is that we cannot access the material for training because it is on YouTube. In China, we do not have access to YouTube."
"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems. It is slow in production."
"It should integrate with more ERP solutions like SAP. It doesn't currently have that ability."
Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews while WorkFusion is ranked 10th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 30 reviews. Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4, while WorkFusion is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkFusion writes "Helps improve our accuracy and compliance, but the analytics module can be confusing". Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and IBM Datacap, whereas WorkFusion is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our Tungsten RPA vs. WorkFusion report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
