JupiterOne vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

JupiterOne and Qualys are both solutions in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category. JupiterOne is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qualys is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. JupiterOne holds a 5.3% mindshare in CASM, compared to Qualys’s 11.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JupiterOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

JupiterOne

Read 2 JupiterOne reviews

1,075 Views
409 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

4,977 Views
846 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

JupiterOne

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

JupiterOne and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in cyber asset management solutions. JupiterOne leads in customizability and user satisfaction with cost-effectiveness, while Qualys is notable for its extensive analytical functionalities.

Features: JupiterOne provides high flexibility and integration capabilities, facilitating dynamic tracking across various environments. It supports extensive adaptability, aiding organizations with complex IT ecosystems. Qualys emphasizes robust vulnerability management and comprehensive threat detection, making it ideal for detailed network security assessments. It offers a wide array of analytical functions, providing thorough network oversight for security-focused environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a straightforward deployment model and extensive support services. It aligns with organizations looking for comprehensive support. JupiterOne delivers an adaptable installation process, enhancing ease of integration into existing systems. It offers rapid deployment, benefiting organizations that prioritize agile integration with fast support responses.

Pricing and ROI: JupiterOne is recognized for favorable pricing, offering strategic ROI for cost-conscious organizations while maintaining customization options. Its pricing structure is tailored for budget-conscious entities looking for functional solutions. Conversely, Qualys demands a higher initial investment due to its extensive feature set. The pricing reflects its value for organizations seeking broad network protections and detailed analytics, where the investment is considered justified.

To learn more, read our detailed JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JupiterOne

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

50th

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (22nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (30th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

10th

Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of JupiterOne is 5.3%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 11.4%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	11.4%
JupiterOne	5.3%
Other	83.3%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Featured Reviews

Chijioke Okoye

Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Unified asset visibility has improved investigations and now simplifies tracking security assets

There are some features that I have shared with our customer service manager. One of them that is relevant to us at this time is the need for better determination of unified devices. Currently, JupiterOne uses hostname weights, MAC addresses, or IP addresses to tie devices together, but we have actually requested a way for us to make those determinations ourselves. For example, when externally scanning a device using Qualys, internally it gives an IP address or FQDN, while externally it might be different. We want to be able to decide ourselves that these two devices are the same device even when they have different names and IP addresses for external and internal use. The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic. However, I believe more can be done regarding unified devices, and giving users the privilege to tie them together would be a good addition to the platform. One of the other things that interest us in JupiterOne and why we really wanted to use the tool is the compliance feature. We wanted to use it to track our compliance since we are ISO 27001 certified. However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use. Although there are some works in progress to improve the compliance part of the tool, I think if they can get it up to speed, that would be a really good improvement.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"JupiterOne helps us aggregate all those things on one single platform, allowing us to quickly identify what environment that asset lives in and what type of asset it is."

"The product’s UI is pretty decent and fast."

"The support is extremely helpful, deserving a 10 out of 10 rating."

"The end-of-life and end-of-service software and hardware are some of my favorite features."

"Regarding return on investment, I first look at the reality of the environment and the decrease in critical vulnerabilities with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which equals a positive return on investment."

"Overall, I would give Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management a nine out of ten."

"The integration with different third-party tools, such as cloud providers like Azure and AWS, and asset management tools like CMDB systems, is valuable."

"I really enjoy the flexibility of the interface setup configuration for my network VLANs, which makes it very easy to configure."

"The dashboards are my favorite feature; I can pull up information and create my own dashboards specifically for what I'm looking for."

"The main thing I appreciate about Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is the cloud environment while tracking software and zero-day vulnerability risk, alongside asset discovery and tagging, as well as attack surface management."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"You can only write Python queries in Jupiter, not other languages, like, SQL or PySpark."

"However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use."

"The deployment is somewhat complicated and could be made more user-friendly for most users. It is currently not user-friendly for all users. It is good but can be improved. It is a new product, and they are working on it."

"I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process."

"The deployment is somewhat complicated and could be made more user-friendly for most users."

"Based on the company's budget, Qualys offers limited features, which can also be utilized in other environments."

"We've received very poor guidance from them, especially after learning several things we need to fix during the Qualys conference."

"With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword."

"Qualys could improve by enhancing its dynamic tagging and role-based access control features, and by refining its user interface for a more intuitive and efficient user experience."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JupiterOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?

Our main use case for JupiterOne is as an asset catalog tool where we document all our assets that are integrated from different platforms such as Device42, Qualys, Microsoft M365, and Defender. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JupiterOne?

JupiterOne has many features. Although none comes to mind almost immediately, I know it often depends on how we are able to write or craft the queries. JupiterOne has been very instrumental to me i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Axonius vs JupiterOne

Compared 49% of the time

Wiz vs JupiterOne

Compared 21% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs JupiterOne

Compared 8% of the time

Surface Command vs JupiterOne

Compared 7% of the time

runZero vs JupiterOne

Compared 6% of the time

More JupiterOne Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download JupiterOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.

JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are JupiterOne's key features?

Automated Asset Discovery: Continually identifies and catalogs assets across cloud environments.
Graph-Based Visualization: Offers an intuitive view of asset relationships and influences within the infrastructure.
Policy Management: Simplifies the creation and enforcement of security policies with pre-built templates.
Compliance Mapping: Maps data to compliance frameworks for streamlined reporting and audits.
Alerting and Notification: Provides customizable alerts to maintain proactive security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances visibility and control over cloud assets, reducing risks.
Efficient Risk Management: Supports better decision-making with real-time data analysis.
Cost Savings: Reduces the need for multiple point solutions by centralizing functions.
Time Efficiency: Minimizes manual tasks, allowing teams to focus on core security functions.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs, maintaining performance and efficiency.

In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.

JupiterOne

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

February 2026

Free Report: JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JupiterOne vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors and best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.