AWS Security Hub vs JupiterOne comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JupiterOne are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.9, while JupiterOne is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.5% mindshare in CSPM, compared to JupiterOne’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JupiterOne users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

7,636 Views
3,283 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

JupiterOne

Read 2 JupiterOne reviews

1,075 Views
323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

JupiterOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Security Hub and JupiterOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th)

JupiterOne

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (50th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (22nd), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Security Hub is 3.5%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JupiterOne is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.5%
JupiterOne	0.4%
Other	96.1%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Chijioke Okoye

Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Unified asset visibility has improved investigations and now simplifies tracking security assets

There are some features that I have shared with our customer service manager. One of them that is relevant to us at this time is the need for better determination of unified devices. Currently, JupiterOne uses hostname weights, MAC addresses, or IP addresses to tie devices together, but we have actually requested a way for us to make those determinations ourselves. For example, when externally scanning a device using Qualys, internally it gives an IP address or FQDN, while externally it might be different. We want to be able to decide ourselves that these two devices are the same device even when they have different names and IP addresses for external and internal use. The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic. However, I believe more can be done regarding unified devices, and giving users the privilege to tie them together would be a good addition to the platform. One of the other things that interest us in JupiterOne and why we really wanted to use the tool is the compliance feature. We wanted to use it to track our compliance since we are ISO 27001 certified. However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use. Although there are some works in progress to improve the compliance part of the tool, I think if they can get it up to speed, that would be a really good improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate Security Hub ten out of ten for stability."

"The advantage is that it is cloud-native, and we do not need to install agents or sensors to find findings."

"Very good at detection and providing real-time alerts."

"The platform has valuable features for security."

"One of the most effective features of AWS Security Hub is the easy access to a dashboard with a ready-to-use security score."

"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."

"AWS Security Hub brings many features into one table that is quite useful, and the app team finds it easier to see what is missing."

"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"JupiterOne helps us aggregate all those things on one single platform, allowing us to quickly identify what environment that asset lives in and what type of asset it is."

"The product’s UI is pretty decent and fast."

Cons

"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities."

"Whenever my team gets some alarms from the central team, my team needs to initiate whether it's a real or false trigger. The central team needs to keep adjusting to the parameters or at least the concerned IPs, whether it's really from the company's pool of IPs, so the trigger process can be improved. In the next release of AWS Security Hub, I'd like a better dashboard that could result in better alert visibility."

"AWS Security Hub's configuration and integration are areas where it lacks and needs to improve."

"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."

"It's not user-friendly. Too much going on, too many unnecessary findings, not very visual. You can't do much compared to other similar tools that are cheaper and better."

"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities. It would be beneficial for Security Hub to implement preventative measures and to directly apply recommendations instead of just suggesting them."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"You can only write Python queries in Jupiter, not other languages, like, SQL or PySpark."

"However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What needs improvement with JupiterOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?

Our main use case for JupiterOne is as an asset catalog tool where we document all our assets that are integrated from different platforms such as Device42, Qualys, Microsoft M365, and Defender. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JupiterOne?

JupiterOne has many features. Although none comes to mind almost immediately, I know it often depends on how we are able to write or craft the queries. JupiterOne has been very instrumental to me i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 34% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

Axonius vs JupiterOne

Compared 48% of the time

Wiz vs JupiterOne

Compared 21% of the time

Surface Command vs JupiterOne

Compared 7% of the time

runZero vs JupiterOne

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys TotalCloud vs JupiterOne

Compared 6% of the time

More JupiterOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

March 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download JupiterOne product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

No data available

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.

JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are JupiterOne's key features?

Automated Asset Discovery: Continually identifies and catalogs assets across cloud environments.
Graph-Based Visualization: Offers an intuitive view of asset relationships and influences within the infrastructure.
Policy Management: Simplifies the creation and enforcement of security policies with pre-built templates.
Compliance Mapping: Maps data to compliance frameworks for streamlined reporting and audits.
Alerting and Notification: Provides customizable alerts to maintain proactive security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances visibility and control over cloud assets, reducing risks.
Efficient Risk Management: Supports better decision-making with real-time data analysis.
Cost Savings: Reduces the need for multiple point solutions by centralizing functions.
Time Efficiency: Minimizes manual tasks, allowing teams to focus on core security functions.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs, maintaining performance and efficiency.

In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.

JupiterOne

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne

February 2026

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. JupiterOne report.

See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.