We performed a comparison between Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"I have found Ubiquiti WLAN scalable. We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization and do not plan to increase usage."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"The management features are valuable."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"Ubiquiti WLAN's best feature is the free controller system software."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"The solution is expensive."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The price could be better."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"Ubiquiti WLAN needs to expand the models with external antennas. It needs to improve stability."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The strength of the signal from the access points could be improved."
"The product’s bandwidth could be better."
"The room for improvement is in the controller levels."
"Cloud management is one feature that should be included in the next release. This tool is best suited for small environments, not large and complex ones."
"There seems to be a drop in service. It's definitely a reliability or stability issue we face."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 13th in Wireless LAN with 13 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 36 reviews. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 8.8, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Simple, easy to learn, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Omada Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
