We performed a comparison between Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The simplicity is great."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"Ubiquiti WLAN's most valuable features are that it works well in a hybrid environment and isn't heavy on resources."
"I have found Ubiquiti WLAN scalable. We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization and do not plan to increase usage."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is stable."
"It is similar to the switches, where it is one of those things where it just works. They are very reliable."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"Ubiquiti provides good connectivity for the end-user, so I think it's stable."
"The solution is expensive."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The product needs to improve the user interface in the migration from old to new versions."
"I have never used cloud solutions. My first approach would be something related to the cloud, and backups on the cloud, and maybe an easier way to connect to it because I have an on-premises environment."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"Ubiquiti lacks troubleshooting tools. For example, there aren't tools that your clients can use to gather input on the AP itself. There's no visibility in the application layer or reporting. It doesn't have a lot of management features."
"There seems to be a drop in service. It's definitely a reliability or stability issue we face."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version. A cloud version is the easiest to configure anywhere in the world."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 5 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 12 reviews. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 9.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Easy to use, works well, and simple to deploy remotely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Robust, easy to install, easy to deploy, and has good visibility". Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, NETGEAR Insight Access Points and Aruba Instant. See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
