2022-07-18T13:36:00Z

What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series).

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
  • 0
  • 12
4
PeerSpot user
4 Answers
JJ
Service Sales Associate at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reseller
Top 20
2023-04-26T20:32:04Z
Apr 26, 2023

The price could be better. That is relative to the market right now since it is such a valued Access Point and system to have in place. They can label it at that price, however, for smaller companies who want to use their system, it might be a little too much. It is on the more expensive side. Maybe if you already have a Fortinet system in place, that could be a cheaper option and more reliable for you. However, in the case of Juniper, dropping the price for smaller operations would be useful to expand their reach.

Search for a product comparison
Raihan Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at Excel Technologies ltd
Real User
Top 5
2023-02-16T16:02:05Z
Feb 16, 2023

I haven't had any issues with the product. The solution is expensive. That is why we have a very minor deployment.

GH
IT Support Engineer at Gotech
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
2022-12-29T06:53:46Z
Dec 29, 2022

Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage.

DL
Tech Lead Network at Bonniernews
Real User
Top 20
2022-07-18T13:36:00Z
Jul 18, 2022

You can only get so far with it. If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited. You can alter the channels, and you can alter which bandwidth. However, it stops there. If you want to go deeper in, to do more customization, or have an office with special needs, it can be a bit tricky to get help from Juniper and to get them to do something in the background of the cloud to help.

Learn what your peers think about Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2023.
706,951 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
Apr 26, 2023
Hi Everyone, What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)? Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!
2 out of 4 answers
DL
Tech Lead Network at Bonniernews
Jul 18, 2022
The solution is pretty generic and easy to use.
GH
IT Support Engineer at Gotech
Dec 29, 2022
The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done.
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Director at PeerSpot
Apr 26, 2023
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
2 out of 4 answers
DL
Tech Lead Network at Bonniernews
Jul 18, 2022
As with all cloud offerings, you choose a one, two, three, or five-year license, and then you choose between only managing your Access Point or doing WiFi assurance with the AI. It's your own choice in terms of how much licensing money you want to spend on it. That said, it could be a bit cheaper. If you have a lot of access points, it will be a significant amount of money compared to if you have an on-prem solution. We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point.
GH
IT Support Engineer at Gotech
Dec 29, 2022
The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition.
Download Free Report
Download our free Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2023.
DOWNLOAD NOW
706,951 professionals have used our research since 2012.