"It's a reliable solution."
"Some of the valuable features of this solution are security, the controller is simple to configure, devices are easy to install, and we use the software to administrate all the APs."
"Cisco Wireless is one of the more stable products so their products are scalable."
"Stable and scalable with good technical support."
"The LAN network conductivity is good."
"I'm very satisfied with Cisco's technical support."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to install and the range is good."
"We've found the technical support to be helpful and responsive."
"I have found Ubiquiti WLAN scalable. We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization and do not plan to increase usage."
"The solution is scalable."
"Great management interface."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is stable."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has been stable and is easy to install."
"The pricing is very competitive and the feature sets are very good. It compares well against more expensive options."
"In Latin America, Cisco is very expensive in comparison to other technologies."
"Cisco's architecture is becoming complex."
"They are a pretty expensive option."
"There are some areas of improvement needed in roaming and streaming."
"In the future, it would be great if the solution had a GPS feature that could have the ability through access points to locate cell phone users inside a local wireless network, for example in a stadium."
"In the future, I would like to have Cisco add video documentation on configuring and overall learning of how to use the solutions. For example, in such areas as, security, authentication, and load balancing."
"The main problem that traditional solutions like this one have is that you need to buy packages to deliver a similar solution as a Meraki one."
"It's very scalable, but when you shift gears sometimes, you have to do more work than people anticipate."
"I have found they need to work on the stability of the solution."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version. A cloud version is the easiest to configure anywhere in the world."
"The downside is the interface changes, where they are constantly doing firmware updates."
"I have never used cloud solutions. My first approach would be something related to the cloud, and backups on the cloud, and maybe an easier way to connect to it because I have an on-premises environment."
"The coverage could be increased."
"Switching devices requires reconfiguration from scratch."
"Largely we're happy with the product, however, the firmware deployments could maybe be managed a little bit differently."
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 68 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 12 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Robust, easy to install, easy to deploy, and has good visibility". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Mist Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Aruba Instant, D-Link Wireless, Huawei Wireless and NETGEAR Insight Access Points. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
