We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on our users’ reviews in our categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions received very positive reviews from users. Cisco Wireless has a slight edge over Ubiquiti WLAN since users feel it has better stability and better technical support.
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The simplicity is great."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The FlexConnect feature is the most valuable."
"Good manageability, and stability."
"The product’s stability is great."
"Compared to other solutions, captive guest network is one of the best isolation and tunneling."
"Creating policies is simple."
"It is a very stable solution."
"I find this solution easy to configure and use."
"It gave us the ability to view wireless traffic, unwanted devices on the network, and how they affected overall network performance."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"Great management interface."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is stable."
"All of the interfacing is very good."
"Ubiquiti WLAN's most valuable features are that it works well in a hybrid environment and isn't heavy on resources."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price could be better."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"It's very scalable, but when you shift gears sometimes, you have to do more work than people anticipate."
"The product could be improved with interference reduction. Because wireless frequency interferes with microwave or Bluetooth technologies, this causes issues. A lot of users still use legacy wireless adapters and black box and they do not experience the speed that they could get using the latest technologies. The number of devices on the market makes wireless communications complex. If the problem of interference could be resolved it would further improve utility and ease of system design."
"The pricing of Brazil is very expensive. When you look at other options, they are much cheaper."
"Most definitely the cost."
"There needs to be an access point that is compact and more suitable for small and medium-sized businesses."
"Sometimes, in some rooms the signal could be a bit better, a little stronger."
"Their software's really clunky."
"The coverage provided by the solution is an area of concern in some cases, making it an area where improvements are required."
"During the configuration, we cannot get information on the network level from the regular interface."
"The solution should include and expand on a central management system."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"I have found they need to work on the stability of the solution."
"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."
"The solution should improve stability."
"There seems to be a drop in service. It's definitely a reliability or stability issue we face."
"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 146 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 36 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Mist AI and Cloud and Omada Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Omada Access Points, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
