JSCAPE by Redwood vs webMethods.io comparison

Redwood Software and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Redwood Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.3, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Redwood Software holds a 2.8% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Redwood Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,057 Views
416 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

449 Views
283 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

JSCAPE by Redwood and webMethods.io compete in the file transfer and integration category. JSCAPE has the upper hand for smaller businesses due to its cost efficiency, whereas webMethods.io justifies its high price for large-scale operations with extensive features.

Features: JSCAPE is known for its robust security features including encryption and authentication, making it highly secure. It supports a variety of protocols like FTP, SFTP, and HTTPS, providing flexibility. Automation through triggers simplifies tasks like compressing and emailing files. WebMethods.io provides high scalability and extensive integration capabilities with built-in support for numerous e-business standards and robust security protocols. It offers a user-friendly web interface that simplifies administration and monitoring.

Room for Improvement: JSCAPE can be costly for some small businesses and may improve by offering more flexible pricing plans. Enhancing user interface customization could also provide better user experience. Additionally, expanding integration capabilities with third-party applications can further its appeal. WebMethods.io has a high price barrier for smaller enterprises, suggesting a need for tiered pricing. The complexity of its extensive feature set might overwhelm users, necessitating simplified documentation. Improving customer support response times could enhance its user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JSCAPE is noted for its simple deployment process and a user-friendly interface that makes adoption easier for users with limited technical knowledge. Its customer support is highly responsive, providing assistance 24/7. WebMethods.io is recognized for straightforward deployment with its intuitive interface, but users have noted room for improvement in response times from customer service.

Pricing and ROI: JSCAPE offers more affordable pricing and a flexible licensing model, allowing it to be a viable option for businesses of varying sizes. It is praised for offering a high return on investment by improving operational efficiency and meeting SLA targets. WebMethods.io, while priced higher, provides extensive features for enterprise-grade solutions, delivering a strong ROI for large-scale operations that require robust integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Valuable features include a comprehensive management UI and a strictly controlled managed file transfer."

"Triggers are something that is very useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code, and we can define certain functionality of certain tasks also."

"The automation part of JSCAPE by Redwood is great because you can set up a scheduled delivery with files and be notified if the transfer was successful."

"The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

"Automating and managing the file transfer using JSCAPE has decreased the manual interventions necessary and increased the organization's efficiency and productivity."

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Providing initial guidance would help new users to understand the UI."

"JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps."

"The JSCAPE team could create detailed documents or blogs on how to troubleshoot certain errors that come over in integration with existing environment tools."

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming."

"Setup is time-consuming."

"The GUI has to be enhanced."

"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The solution's release management feature could be better."

"It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"They should develop clear visibility for the onboarding."

"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"It is worth the cost."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 32% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 31% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 11% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

April 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.