Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics NAV comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics NAV based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics NAV report (Updated: September 2022).
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The financials are great.""I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing.""JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis.""EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements.""The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good.""I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing.""The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows.""It’s a stable product."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics NAV is its simplicity of accounting and receiving reports. The solution is similar to Microsoft Excel, and that similarity is good. All the functions of Microsoft Dynamics are user-friendly.""I like Microsoft Dynamics' simplicity. The interface is excellent, and it's a highly mature product. You can hardly find any bugs in the product.""Microsoft Dynamics NAV's most valuable feature is the integration with other Microsoft solutions.""Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities.""I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional.""The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly.""It is easy to use, and it works very well for small-scale companies.""The initial setup is easy - because it stands on Microsoft offerings, it's simple and intuitive to use."

More Microsoft Dynamics NAV Pros →

"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management.""EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved.""The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve.""The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics.""They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards.""The implementation procedure could be simplified.""They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation.""JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Cons →

"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long.""It would be nice if the integration process was easier.""Microsoft Dynamics NAV could improve the reporting.""I think Microsoft should improve on the process of how the user decides on a business workflow. For example, there may be some kind of drag-and-drop interface that lets us decide for ourselves how to develop the business workflows that fit our purpose.""Microsoft Dynamics NAV could be improved in terms of exporting income statements and balance sheets. Currently, there is a feature, but you can only have the last three years. I spent some time trying to improve the KPI portion that exports the data, that already calculates the sub forms or subtotals, but they weren't able to break that up into different dimensions. They've now managed to crowd the separate table and you can export that, but it's only for the last three years. So, they could improve this solution by getting the chart of accounts or the account schedules to be exported, where you can go further than just three years with it.""The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements.""I wouldn't say that Microsoft Dynamics is very scalable.""In the next release, I would like to see a quality check module - Navision doesn't have one, and the industry very much requires it."

More Microsoft Dynamics NAV Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."
  • "There is an annual license for this solution."
  • "It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
  • "The solution is really expensive."
  • "The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."
  • "In terms of price, it is not on the high end."
  • "JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."
  • "EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."
  • More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
  • "I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure."
  • "Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model."
  • "NAV might be a little pricey for a small or medium-sized company, but all the solutions out there are."
  • "The cost is one of the benefits. If you don't want to go for the full-blown finance and operations, the pricing model is a lot cheaper and has now switched to being based on a per-user subscription. So, if it's on cloud, you now have an expense instead of a large CapEx. If it's on-prem, you obviously still have to continue with the licensing model that they have, but if you compare the features and functionality, in terms of the price that you pay, I find it's better than other products. My answer on the pricing would be slightly different, depending on the country you're in and the return on investment, based on the size of the company. It's well-priced internationally. I think the new model is priced even better because it's now subscription-based and, if you go for cloud, the return on investment is a lot quicker and if it's expense, you can cap it. If you do take the on-prem version, the licensing is still priced as what it used to be, so that would depend on what country you are in."
  • More Microsoft Dynamics NAV Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies.
    Top Answer:The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive. The cost of the solution depends on the size of the… more »
    Top Answer:I would advise others t choose a cloud base solution. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:Microsoft Dynamics NAV is good for smaller-sized companies.
    Top Answer:As our company grew we had to switch from Microsoft Dynamics NAV to a solution that was suited for larger-sized companies.
    out of 58 in ERP
    Average Words per Review
    out of 58 in ERP
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Dynamics NAV, MS Dynamics NAV
    Learn More
    Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of comprehensive enterprise resource planning software that combines business value, standards-based technology, and deep industry experience into a business solution with a low total cost of ownership. EnterpriseOne is the first ERP solution to run all applications on Apple iPad. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne also delivers mobile applications.
    Microsoft Dynamics NAV is a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution that provides small and midsize businesses greater control over their financials and can simplify their supply chain, manufacturing, and operations. It's quick to implement and easy to use, with the power to support your growth ambition.
    Learn more about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Learn more about Microsoft Dynamics NAV
    Sample Customers
    TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
    Harris Farm Markets, Mister Spex GmbH, Bounce Foods, Eurofin Services SA, Medica Medizintechnik, Associated Gaskets, Onduline, Sitka Surfboard Corporation, World Animal Protection
    Top Industries
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Construction Company18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Construction Company20%
    Import And Exporter10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Media Company10%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise26%
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics NAV
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics NAV and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 17 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 7th in ERP with 18 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Offers a variety of features, easy to use and understand, reasonably priced, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very easy to scale and the new pricing model is a lot cheaper". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud and SAP Business One, whereas Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics NAV report.

    See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.