We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature of this solution, is that it provides businesses with a way to see information from across different process streams, in one place via dashboards."
"LN is definitely a stable product. It's number one on Gartner's four quadrants."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"Material planning and predictive planning are both essential aspects."
"The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"The product can scale."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"The interface can be difficult sometimes. I need to apply a bar code system, such as business intelligence and user interface tools. The user has to be a technician sometimes to use it."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Infor LX and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.