We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"It's not too hard to handle the initial setup."
"The product has been stable so far."
"There are numerous good features."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The financials are great."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The finance model within this solution does not have very strong reporting functionality, which I would like to see improved."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"The user interface is not very intuitive for newer users."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"While Infor LN incorporates the latest business processes and functions, there is always room for improvement as the business grows. In the new normal, it could stand to incorporate quite a few automation processes like the RPA and utilize machine learning in the Internet of Things."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 11 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 24 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A solution which works brilliantly for large-scale manufacturing industries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Offers a variety of features, easy to use and understand, reasonably priced, and has responsive technical support". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Infor LX and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.