No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infor LN vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.2
Infor LN enhances efficiency and reduces costs, surpassing SAP for intensive use, providing early positive financial outcomes.
Sentiment score
5.6
Users report financial benefits from JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, citing stability, cost savings, and minimal resources needed for support.
Infor has saved us time by bringing a large division into one language and has saved us money.
Project Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Previously, there was significant development for customizations, but with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, the necessary reports are readily available, reducing maintenance costs.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Infor LN's customer service receives mixed reviews, excelling in standard issues but struggling with complex ones and resource limitations.
Sentiment score
4.6
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's technical support is responsive and competent, but complex issues may require preparation and persistence for resolution.
They respond quickly and are helpful overall.
IT System Administrator at Niko d.o.o.
My overall experience contacting Infor technical support is good.
Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck.
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
They act quickly, and the partners stay up-to-date with the latest innovations.
Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square
The technical support is a strong point, and I would rate it an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Infor LN offers excellent scalability and adaptability, supporting multi-company environments, with rapid user expansion and minimal administration needs.
Sentiment score
7.3
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne efficiently scales across businesses, ensuring reliable integration despite challenges, making it suitable for diverse industries.
Infor is a 100% scalable solution that supports our needs.
Project Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
The system is scalable.
Head of IT Office Head at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Infor LN is highly stable and reliable, with strong user ratings and support, ideal for diverse production companies.
Sentiment score
7.6
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is generally reliable with most users reporting high stability, especially with proper maintenance and updates.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very stable.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
I rate the stability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a seven out of ten.
Commercial Controller at IFS
 

Room For Improvement

Infor LN needs UI enhancement, better integration, improved customization, and training to boost HR, supply chain, and market reach.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne needs improvements in UI, reporting tools, cloud features, customization, and industry-specific functionalities for better usability.
Improvements in AI features for the UI could enhance the overall experience.
Project Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
If they can make it a simple drag and drop, low code or no code method, it would be easier.
Infor Ln Manufacturing Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We have problems with the database, not with Infor - with the Oracle database.
Head of IT Office Head at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
JD Edwards should consider implementing more user-friendly interfaces and downloads to aid end users.
Commercial Controller at IFS
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful.
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like to see improvements in the analytical part of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, specifically in the business intelligence aspect, to enhance its capabilities compared to bespoke solutions.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
 

Setup Cost

Infor LN provides flexible licensing and competitive pricing, with costs varying by user count, company size, and deployment type.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers competitive pricing with a perpetual license, ideal for medium to large enterprises, but can incur extra costs.
Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.
IT System Administrator at Niko d.o.o.
The price is seven on a scale of one to ten, with SAP being more expensive than Infor LN.
Head of IT Office Head at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive.
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Infor LN provides robust cloud-based solutions with flexible integration, catering to diverse industries with strong support and pre-configured options.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides user-friendly, scalable ERP solutions with extensive integration, customization, and advanced data management for improved business processes.
It simplifies tracking by following every transaction in the system, allowing finance to see online each finance transaction from production orders, purchase orders, inventory, and project-wise.
Project Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
The biggest advantage when you start using Infor LN is the implementation accelerators where you have access to pre-configured or pre-tailored data points and dashboards that suit the specific industry.
Infor Ln Manufacturing Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The most valuable feature of Infor LN is the support and educational tools it provides.
The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information.
Director at Vertex Business Systems
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne manages multiple manufacturing modes in the same process effectively.
Chief Financial and Operating Officer at Aicrem Square
The multi-currency feature affects our global operations and helped us implement it across South Africa, Japan, Portugal, and South Korea.
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor LN
Ranking in ERP
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in ERP
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LN is 2.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infor LN2.5%
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne2.8%
Other94.7%
ERP
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2123580 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infor Ln Manufacturing Consultant at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Cloud deployment has streamlined complex manufacturing projects and supports faster implementations
The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier. It is easy now, but it needs some technical guidance in terms of writing code, fixing it, and making it more flexible for users. The improvement needed in this area is around twenty percent. Seventy to eighty percent is user-friendly, but if Infor can put more energies into making this easier, that would be beneficial. Extensions and any customizations are also a bit technical. If they can make it a simple drag and drop, low code or no code method, it would be easier. Another area for improvement is AI integration. As we are in the AI era, Infor is putting energies into integrating AI within the application, but they are still in progress. If AI can be integrated so that customers or users can interact with it, that would be beneficial. If users want any information from the system or application, it should be a chat-based, user-friendly interaction so that they can get insights in real time. AI integration would add an advantage on a greater level, and Infor should focus on this improvement area.
Euan Ellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization
Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LN?
Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.
What needs improvement with Infor LN?
The workflow configuration, alert configuration, and report designing could be a bit easier. It is easy now, but it needs some technical guidance in terms of writing code, fixing it, and making it ...
What is your primary use case for Infor LN?
I am a user of Infor and occasionally use Salesforce as well. I have been using Infor for close to a decade. I am a consultant, specifically an implementation consultant where I implement Infor LN....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.
 

Also Known As

Infor ERP LN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LTH Castings, Gloucester Engineering, Gorman-Rupp, Computer Designs, Instrument Technology, GWA Group Limited, PRIDE Industries, CAV Aerospace, New Scale Technologies Inc.
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.