No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Melissa Data Quality vs ibi Data Quality comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ibi Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
22nd
Ranking in Data Scrubbing Software
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Melissa Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
11th
Ranking in Data Scrubbing Software
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of ibi Data Quality is 2.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Melissa Data Quality is 3.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Melissa Data Quality3.9%
ibi Data Quality2.4%
Other93.7%
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

VP
Solutions Architect at GreenZone Solutions Inc
Offers numerous prebuilt data quality plans that can be reused for various data cleansing tasks
We had many duplicates originating from different source systems. We were able to match and deduplicate a significant amount of data. Additionally, we could synchronize and write back the latest information to the systems that were out of sync, ensuring they had the most recent data. As a result, we could write back and update the source systems.
GM
Data Architect at World Vision
SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing
- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Works quickly to develop and deploy to production."
"Ibi Data Quality offers numerous prebuilt data quality plans that can be reused for various data cleansing tasks. Additionally, it provides a variety of prebuilt match and merge rules for performing master data management,"
"One great feature with OmniGen is the time it takes to develop and deploy to production."
"We mainly communicate with our customers via email, so we primarily use it to find a phone number so we can contact them more efficiently. This allows us to talk to them and resolve their issues much more quickly."
"It cuts down significantly on time in trying to match names to addresses. I can do in a few hours what would otherwise take days to accomplish."
"The customers' addresses are now complete, correct and follow one consistent format."
"It is easy to install and configure, integrates well with Visual Studio Data Tools, generates a unique key for every address it processes, generates correct error codes whenever it corrects an address, and is very reliable."
"​Allows us to identify cell phones before dialing, and giving us data about callers."
"Our customer database is now significantly more accurate and reliable."
"Since we switched to Melissa Data web services, we do not need to maintain those servers and/or software, and we get the most up-to-date addresses from USPS."
"We use a Melissa API to access the data, so it easy to use, accurate, and fast."
 

Cons

"The special integration support is something that could be improved in the solution."
"Their data governance portal can be improved. It lacks data governance-related features. Also, PII and anomaly detection could be valuable use cases for ibi. Adding these features would be a great enhancement."
"MatchUp seems to be single threaded, and limits the amount of data that can be processed automatically."
"We are no longer using Melissa Data to clean up our address information as there are free tools that we can use to do the same thing."
"The billing structure does not seem very accurate. We’ve had issues with miscounted batch records processed"
"To continually update the database with NAICS codes on businesses."
"It changes names to what it thinks it should be when the spelling is different. It should not do this."
"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate.​"
"It would be great if the product can be expanded to standardize and clean Telephone Numbers and TaxID’s/SSN’s."
"Needs more/better search tools are needed. Also, state and local tax data would be nice."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"​We are concerned that our own pricing is going up every year for Melissa Data products, but we highly recommend the services for people who are routinely sending out mailings."
"They were willing to work with our preferred vendors, though it involved extra steps to get the license."
"Trial subscriptions (via cloud) are very cheap and easy to use. It’s a great way to test Listware to see if you want to go deeper with integration."
"The only complaint that I have towards it is they sell licenses based on a range of usage, and I feel those ranges are too large."
"Pricing is very reasonable."
"Cloud version is very cheap. On-premise version is expensive."
"Buy a lot more credits than you think you’re going to need."
"Melissa pricing is competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
 

Also Known As

iWay Software Data Quality, iWay Omni-Gen Data Quality Edition, Omni-Gen Data Quality
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ICA Fluor, Estonia Police Department, Kansas City Police Department
Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.
Find out what your peers are saying about Melissa Data Quality vs. ibi Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.